When Will Hollywood Get the Family Right?



Films themselves not only provide a useful reflection of the society creating them but also contribute to a reshaping of that very society. Unfortunately, an examination of family portrayals in contemporary films reflects a microcosmic California film community largely deformed by deracination and divorce. That deformation leads, in turn, to films that may encourage in the audience a sense of anomie and estrangement. Such deformation and dysphoria, in karma-like fashion, echoes reminiscently the fractured African American “family” legacy from slavery practices. This Hollywood reflection and spread of personal anomie and estrangement as well as relationship fluidity and family instability reaches global proportions with the vigorous export of Hollywood fare, and, thus, Hollywood values. Hollywood may accidentally champion the attraction toward cohesion among cultures worldwide, but at what cost if the content of the cohesion capriciously escapes scrutiny and lacks sculpting toward healthy function? This does not have to be so. Hollywood has a responsibility not only for successful exportation, but also for what is being sent abroad and at home. Like it or not. Films have the power to reveal a positive psychology, pro-social construction of “healthy family,” which includes—and encourages—stability, faith, community, growth, personal responsibility, and rich extended relationships. The problem is not that Hollywood no longer wishes to make such films. The problem may be that Hollywood may no longer know how.


Divorce Rate South Central Grand Canyon Marital Union Young Black Director 


  1. Allen, E. E. (1994). Strategies for the 1990s: Using the media for good. In D. Zillmann, J. Bryant, & A. C. Huston (Eds.), Media, children, and the family: Social scientific, psychodynamic, and clinical perspectives. LEA’s communication series (pp. 85–95). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  2. Akbar, N. (1985). Nile Valley origins of the science of the mind. In I. Van Sertima (Ed.), Nile valley civilizations. New York: Journal of African Civilization.Google Scholar
  3. Anonymous, Accessed via Google. http://www.epinions.com/mvie_mu-1124997/display_∼full_specs. Cited June 4, 2008.
  4. Almaas, A. H. (2000). Facets of unity. Boston, MA: Shambala Publications.Google Scholar
  5. Arnett, J. J. (1995). Adolescents’ uses of media for self-socialization. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 24, 519–533.Google Scholar
  6. Arriga, X. B. (2001). The ups and downs of dating: Fluctuation in satisfaction in newly formed romantic relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 754–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arriga, X. B., & Agnew, C. R. (2001). Being committed: Affective, cognitive, and conative components of relationship commitment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1190–1203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Atkins, S. (1978). Child of Satan, child of God (p. 83). New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  9. Bahr, K. S., & Bahr, H. M. (1995). Autonomy, community, and the mediation of value: Comments on Apachean grandmothering, cultural change, and the media. In. C. K. Jacobson (Ed.). American families: Issues in race and ethnicity. Garland library of sociology, Vol. 30; Garland reference library of social science, Vol. 1015 (pp. 229–260). New York: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
  10. Barash, D. E., & Lipton, J. E. (2001). The myth of monogamy: Fidelity and infidelity in animals and people. Gordonsville, VA: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  11. Bennett, L., Jr. (2003). Before the mayflower: A history of Black America. Chicago, IL: Johnson.Google Scholar
  12. Bhawuk, D. P. S. (2008). Globalization and indigenous cultures: Homogenization or differentiation? International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 32(4), 305–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Black, L. & Jackson, V. (2005). Families of African origin: An overview. In M. McGoldrick, J. Giordano, & N. Garcia-Preto, Ethnicity and family therapy (pp. 77–86). New York: The Guildford Press.Google Scholar
  14. Boulay, M., Storey, J. D., & Sood, S. (2002). Indirect exposure to a family planning mass media campaign in Nepal. Journal of Health Communication, 7(5), 379–399.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Bowlby, J. (1969/1982). Attachment and loss, Vol. 1: Attachment. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  16. Bowlby, J. (1979). The making and breaking of affectional bonds. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  17. Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  18. Cashill, J. (2008). What’s the matter with California? Cultural rumbles from the golden state and why the rest of us should be shaking. New York: Threshold.Google Scholar
  19. Christian Party. (2008). Accessed via Google. http://www.christianparty.net/divorcecalifornia.htm. Cited June 4, 2008.
  20. City-Data.com city-data.com/forum/religion-philosophy/203044-famous-last-words.html. Accessed via Google. Cited June 24, 2008.Google Scholar
  21. Clooney, G. (2006, March 6). Oscar Award ceremony.Google Scholar
  22. Dateline NBC. (2004, October 15). Interview.Google Scholar
  23. Dion, K. L., & Dion, K. K. (1988). Romantic love: Individual and cultural perspectives. In R. J. Sternberg & M. L. Barners (Eds.), The psychology of love. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Ellroy, J. (1996). My dark places (pp. 24–25, 105, 169). New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  25. Finstad, S. (2001). Natasha: The biography of Natalie Wood (pp. 139, 144). New York: Harmony Books.Google Scholar
  26. Fu, W. W. (2006). Concentration and homogenization of international movie sources: examining foreign film import profiles. Journal of Communication, 56(4), 813–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gammack, J. (2002, April). Mindscapes and Internet-mediated communication. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 7(3).Accessed via Internet Explorer on November 16, 2008, http://www.centrelink.org/ANTH498/GAMMACK.pdf
  28. Gamble, J. (2007, August) Holding environment as home: Maintaining a seamless blend across the virtual/physical divide, M/C Journal, 10(4). Retrieved November.15, 2008, from http://journal.media-culture.org.au/0708/11-gamble.php
  29. Guiness, O. (1993). The American hour: A time of reckoning and the once and future role of faith. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  30. Harry’s Reviews. (1998, October 2). Ain’t it cool news.Google Scholar
  31. Hines, P. M. & Boyd-Franklin, N. (2005). African American families. In M. McGoldrick, J. Giordano, & N. Garcia-Preto (Eds.), Ethnicity and family therapy (pp. 87–100). New York: The Guildford Press.Google Scholar
  32. Lee, H. (1960). To kill a mockingbird. Philadelphia, PA: J.B. Lippincott & Co.Google Scholar
  33. Lerner, D. (1958). The passing of traditional society. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
  34. Levy, E. (1991). The American dream of family in film: From decline to a comeback. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 22(2), 187–204.Google Scholar
  35. Mead, M. (1930). Growing up in New Guinea: A comparative study of primitive education. New York: Harper Perennial Modern Classics, 2001.Google Scholar
  36. Mead, M. (1970). Culture and commitment. London, UK: Bodley Head.Google Scholar
  37. MPAA (Motion Picture Association of America). (2008). Home page. http://www.mpaa.org/researchStatistics.asp. Accessed via Internet Explorer, November 14, 2008.
  38. Nobles, W. (2004). African philosophy: Foundations for black psychology. In R. Joes (Ed.), Black psychology (4th ed.). New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  39. O’Neal, T. (2004). A paper life. New York: HarperEntertainment.Google Scholar
  40. Parejko, J. (2008). Stolen Vows: The illusion of no-fault divorce and the rise of the American divorce industry. Accessed via Google. http://www.stolenvows.com/chapter3.htm. Cited June 4, 2008.
  41. Reagan, M. (2004). Twice adopted (p. 42). Nashville. TN: Broadman & Holman.Google Scholar
  42. Royce, J. (2002). California: A study of American character (p. 319). Berkeley, CA: Heyday Books.Google Scholar
  43. Salinger, J. D. (1951). Catcher in the rye. Boston, MA: Little, Brown & Co.Google Scholar
  44. Sheridan, E. (2006). Conservative implication of the irrelevance of racism in contemporary African American cinema. Journal of Black Studies, 37(2), 177–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Smith, J. R., & Smith, L. G. (1974). Beyond monogamy: Recent studies of sexual alternatives in marriage. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Sullivan, R. (2008, November 4). Reese Witherspoon’s innocence abroad. Vogue. http://www.style.com/vogue/feature/2008_Nov_Reese_Witherspoon/. Accessed November 10, 2008, via Internet Explorer.
  47. The Belknap Collection for the Performing Arts. (2008). Cinema: African American cinema. Accessed via Internet Explorer, November 13, 2008. http://www.uflib.ufl.edu/SPEC/belknap/cinema/cinemaaa.htm
  48. Triandis, H. C. (1994). Culture and social behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill. http://lucy.ukc.ac.uk/Anthsoc/multi-choice.html
  49. Twain, M. (1884). Huckleberry Finn. New York: Charles L. Webster and Company.Google Scholar
  50. van Sertima, I. (1976). They came before Columbus. The African presence in ancient America. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  51. van Wagner, K. (2008). Attachment styles. About.com: Psychology. Accessed via Internet Explorer. December 15, 2008. http://psychology.about.com/od/loveandattraction/ss/attachmentstyle.htm
  52. Wallerstein, J. (2000). The unexpected legacy of divorce: The 25 year landmark study (pp. xiii, xxvii, xxviii, xxxiii, 299, 301). New York: Hyperion .Google Scholar
  53. Zillmann, D., Bryant, J., & Huston, A. C. (Eds). (1994). Media, children, and the family: Social scientific, psychodynamic, and clinical perspectives. LEA’s communication series. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ingram’s MagazineKansas CityUSA

Personalised recommendations