Overview of Rho GTPase History
It is estimated that approximately 1% of the human genome encodes proteins that either regulate or are regulated by direct interaction with members of the Rho (Ras-homologous) family of small GTPases (Jaffe and Hall 2005). Rho GTPases are low molecular weight proteins (21–28 kDa) that control complex biological processes. The most widely studied and best-characterized members are the three “classical” members, RhoA, Rac1, and Cdc42, and much of our current concepts of Rho GTPase function are based on their properties (Aspenstrom et al. 2007; Wennerberg and Der 2004). They act as bi-molecular switches that cycle between two conformational states: GDP-bound (“inactive” state) and GTP-bound (“active” state) and they hydrolyze GTP. In the “active” GTP-bound state, Rho is able to activate downstream effectors. There are 20 human family members (Fig. 1.1) that receive extracellular ligand-stimulated signals from upstream cell surface receptors including tyrosine kinase, cytokine, adhesion, integrin, and G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). They transmit signals to a plethora of cytoplasmic effectors that regulate essentially all aspects of normal cell physiology (Etienne-Manneville and Hall 2002). These include the regulation of cell proliferation and survival, cell polarity and morphogenesis, adhesion, migration, growth, gene transcription, and vesicular trafficking. Moreover, a causal role for the aberrant regulation of Rho GTPases has been found for human disease, including cancer, and in neurological and developmental disorders (Govek et al. 2005; Sahai and Marshall 2002). Rho GTPases are also targeted by pathogenic bacteria to facilitate their infection of human cells (Finlay 2005; Munter et al. 2006). In this chapter, we provide a historical overview of some of the key discoveries that provide the foundation for our current knowledge of Rho GTPase regulation and function, with an emphasis on the importance of deregulated Rho GTPase function in human disease.
KeywordsMigration Lymphoma Mold Cysteine NADPH
We thank Kent Rossman for help with preparation of the dendrogram of the Rho family GTPases and Lanika DeGrafenreid for assistance in manuscript preparation. We apologize to all colleagues whose work could not be cited due to space limitations. Our studies are supported by NIH grants CA063071 and CA67771.
- Beder, L.B., Gunduz, M., Ouchida, M., Gunduz, E., Sakai, A., Fukushima, K., Nagatsuka, H., Ito, S., Honjo, N., Nishizaki, K., et al. (2006). Identification of a candidate tumor suppressor gene RHOBTB1 located at a novel allelic loss region 10q21 in head and neck cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 132, 19–27.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Berman, D.M., Shih Ie, M., Burke, L.A., Veenstra, T.D., Zhao, Y., Conrads, T.P., Kwon, S.W., Hoang, V., Yu, L.R., Zhou, M., et al. (2004). Profiling the activity of G proteins in patient-derived tissues by rapid affinity-capture of signal transduction proteins (GRASP). Proteomics 4, 812–818.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dallery, E., Galiegue-Zouitina, S., Collyn-d’Hooghe, M., Quief, S., Denis, C., Hildebrand, M.P., Lantoine, D., Deweindt, C., Tilly, H., Bastard, C., et al. (1995). TTF, a gene encoding a novel small G protein, fuses to the lymphoma-associated LAZ3 gene by t(3;4) chromosomal translocation. Oncogene 10, 2171–2178.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Munter, S., Way, M., and Frischknecht, F. (2006). Signaling during pathogen infection. Sci STKE 2006, re5.Google Scholar
- Qiu, R.G., Chen, J., Kirn, D., McCormick, F., and Symons, M. (1995a). An essential role for Rac in Ras transformation. Nature 374, 457–459.Google Scholar
- Qiu, R.G., Chen, J., McCormick, F., and Symons, M. (1995b). A role for Rho in Ras transformation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 92, 11781–11785.Google Scholar
- Reid, T., Furuyashiki, T., Ishizaki, T., Watanabe, G., Watanabe, N., Fujisawa, K., Morii, N., Madaule, P., and Narumiya, S. (1996). Rhotekin, a new putative target for Rho bearing homology to a serine/threonine kinase, PKN, and rhophilin in the rho-binding domain. J Biol Chem 271, 13556–13560.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shinjo, K., Koland, J.G., Hart, M.J., Narasimhan, V., Johnson, D.I., Evans, T., and Cerione, R.A. (1990). Molecular cloning of the gene for the human placental GTP-binding protein Gp (G25K): identification of this GTP-binding protein as the human homolog of the yeast cell-division-cycle protein CDC42. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 87, 9853–9857.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ueda, T., Kikuchi, A., Ohga, N., Yamamoto, J., and Takai, Y. (1990). Purification and characterization from bovine brain cytosol of a novel regulatory protein inhibiting the dissociation of GDP from and the subsequent binding of GTP to rhoB p20, a ras p21-like GTP-binding protein. J Biol Chem 265, 9373–9380.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- van Golen, K.L., Davies, S., Wu, Z.F., Wang, Y., Bucana, C.D., Root, H., Chandrasekharappa, S., Strawderman, M., Ethier, S.P., and Merajver, S.D. (1999). A novel putative low-affinity insulin-like growth factor-binding protein, LIBC (lost in inflammatory breast cancer), and RhoC GTPase correlate with the inflammatory breast cancer phenotype. Clin Cancer Res 5, 2511–2519.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Whitehead, I., Kirk, H., and Kay, R. (1995a). Retroviral transduction and oncogenic selection of a cDNA encoding Dbs, a homolog of the Dbl guanine nucleotide exchange factor. Oncogene 10, 713–721.Google Scholar
- Whitehead, I., Kirk, H., Tognon, C., Trigo-Gonzalez, G., and Kay, R. (1995b). Expression cloning of lfc, a novel oncogene with structural similarities to guanine nucleotide exchange factors and to the regulatory region of protein kinase C. J Biol Chem 270, 18388–18395.Google Scholar