Advertisement

Terrorism: The Dilemma of Response

  • Elena Pokalova
Chapter

Abstract

Terrorism today presents a global security challenge. However, not a single strategy has been acknowledged as the most effective response to this challenge. Instead, heated debates surround the implementation of anti-terrorist measures. This chapter analyzes available response strategies based on their levels of effectiveness and legitimacy. The goal of this project is to trace the intricate relationships between civil liberties and terrorism and to investigate how civil liberties affect the probability of terrorist attacks. The analysis of empirical data indicates that an increase in civil liberties leads to a decline in the probability of a terrorist attack occurring in a country. This suggests that civil liberties should not be curtailed in the fight against terrorism. In this respect, I argue, the response to terrorism should be within the law enforcement framework, which does not require the implementation of additional policy provisions inherent in the counter-terrorism approach.

Keywords

Terrorist Attack Armed Conflict Civil Liberty Liberal Democracy Terrorist Activity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Alesina, A., Devleeschauwer, A., Easterly, W., Kurlat S., & Wacziarg, R. (2003). Fractionalization. Journal of Economic Growth 8(2), 155–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (1996). U.S. Code.Google Scholar
  3. Banks, C. (2004). Protecting (or destroying) freedom through law: The USA Patriot Act’s constitutional implications. In: D.B. Cohen & J.W. Wells (Eds.), American National Security and Civil Liberties in an Era of Terrorism (pp. 29–70). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  4. Bremmer, L.P. (1992). The West’s counter-terrorist strategy. Terror. Pol. Viol. 4(4), 255–262.Google Scholar
  5. Briggs, R., Fieschi C., & Lownsbrough H. (2006). Bringing It Home: Community-Based Approaches to Counter-Terrorism. London: Demos.Google Scholar
  6. Cauley, J., & Im, E.I. (1988). Intervention policy analysis of skyjackings and other terrorist incidents. Am. Econ. Rev. 78(2), 27–31.Google Scholar
  7. Central Intelligence Agency (2004a). The CIA World Factbook: Ethnic Groups. Washington, DC: CIA.Google Scholar
  8. Central Intelligence Agency (2004b). The CIA World Factbook: Religions. Washington, DC: CIA.Google Scholar
  9. Chalk, P. (1998). The response to terrorism as a threat to liberal democracy. Aus. J. Pol. & His. 44(3), 373–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Charters, D.A. (1994). Conclusions: Security and liberty in balance – Countering terrorism in the democratic context. In: D.A. Charters (Ed.), The Deadly Sin of Terrorism: Its Effect on Democracy and Civil Liberty in Six Countries (pp. 211–227). Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  11. Clarke, R.V., & Newman, G.R. (2007). Police and the prevention of terrorism. Policing 1(1), 9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crelinsten, R.D. (1998). The discourse and practice of counter-terrorism in liberal democracies. Aus. J. Pol. & His. 44(1), 389–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crenshaw, M. (2000). The psychology of terrorism: An agenda for the 21st century. Pol. Psych. 21(2), 405–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Enders, W., & Sandler, T. (1993). The effectiveness of antiterrorism policies: A vector–autoregression–intervention analysis. Am. Pol. Sci. Rev. 87(4), 829–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Enders, W., & Sandler, T. (2002). Patterns of transnational terrorism, 1970–1999: Alternative time-series estimates. Int. Stud. Quart. 46(2), 145–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Enders, W., & Sandler, T. (2006). The Political Economy of Terrorism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Faria, J.R. (2006). Terrorist innovations and anti-terrorist policies. Terror. Pol. Viol. 18(1), 47–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Freedom House (2006). Freedom in the World Country Ratings: 1972–2006. New York: Freedom House.Google Scholar
  19. Gleditsch, N.P., Wallensteen, P., Eriksson, M., Sollenberg, M., & Strand, H. (2007). UCDP/PRIO Armed Conflict Dataset. Version 4–2007, CDP/PRIO.Google Scholar
  20. Henry, V.E. (2002). The need for a coordinated and strategic logical police approach to terrorism: A practitioner’s perspective. Police Pract. Res. 3(4), 319–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hewitt, C. (1984). The Effectiveness of Anti-Terrorist Policies. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  22. Innes, M. (2006). Policing uncertainty: Countering terror through community intelligence and democratic policing. Ann. Amer. Acad. Pol. Soc. Sci. 605(1), 222–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Katzenstein, P.J. (1993). Coping with terrorism: Norms and internal security in Germany and Japan. In: J. Goldstein & R.O. Keohane (Eds.), Ideas and Foreign Policy, Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change (pp. 265–295). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  24. LeVine, V.T., & Salert, B.A. (1996). Does a coercive official response deter terrorism? The case of the PLO. Terror. Pol. Viol. 8(1), 22–49.Google Scholar
  25. Li, Q. (2005). Does democracy promote or reduce transnational terrorist incidents? J. Conflict Res. 49(2), 278–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Liao, T.F. (1994). Interpreting Probability Models: Logit, Probit, and Other Generalized Linear Models. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
  27. Lum, C., Kennedy, L.W., & Sherley, A.J. (2006). The effectiveness of counter-terrorism strategies: A Campbell systematic review. Retrieved from http://db.c2admin.org/doc-pdf/Lum_Terrorism_Review.pdf.
  28. Marshall, M.G., & Jaggers, K. (2005). Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2004. Arlington, VA: Center for Global Policy.Google Scholar
  29. Mickolus, E.F., Sandler, T., Murdock, J.M., & Flemming, P.A. (2004). International Terrorism: Attributes of Terrorist Events, 1968–2003. Dunn Loring, VA: Vinyard Software.Google Scholar
  30. Miller, G.D. (2007). Confronting terrorisms: Group motivation and successful state policies. Terror. Pol. Viol. 17(3), 331–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Murray, J. (2005). Policing terrorism: A threat to community policing or just a shift in priorities? Police Pract. Res. 6(4), 347–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nunn, S. (2003). Seeking tools for the war on terror: A critical assessment of emerging technologies in law enforcement. Policing Int. J. Police Strat. Man. 26(3), 454–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ozdogan, A. (2006). Where do terrorists come from? In: R.W. Orttung & A. Makarychev (Eds.), National Counter-Terrorism Strategies, Washington, DC: IOS Press, pp. 21–42.Google Scholar
  34. Pierson, P. (2004). Politics in Time. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Przeworski, A., & Limongi, F. (1997). Modernization: Theories and facts. World Pol. 49(2), 155–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Putin, V. (2006a). On counterterrorist measures. Presidential Decree, No. 116. February 15, 2006. Moscow: Kremlin.Google Scholar
  37. Putin, V. (2006b). On counteraction of terrorism, Federal Law of the Russian Federation, No. 35-FZ, March 6, 2006. Moscow: Kremlin.Google Scholar
  38. Reinares, F. (1998). Democratic regimes, internal security politics, and the threat of terrorism. Aus. J. Pol. & His. 44(3), 351–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schmid, A.P. (1992). Terrorism and democracy. Terror. Pol. Viol. 4(4), 14–25.Google Scholar
  40. Sederberg, P.C. (1995). Conciliation as counter-terrorist strategy. J. Peace Res. 32(3), 295–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Transparency International (2004). Corruption Perceptions Index. Retrieved from http://www.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/cpi/2004
  42. United Nations Statistics Division (2004). GDP per capita, Current Prices, in U.S. Dollars. Retrieved from http://unstats.un.org/unsd/snaama/dnlList.asp.
  43. United States House of Representatives. Subcommittee on National Security, Emerging Threats, and International Relations of the Committee on Government Reform (2004). Effective Strategies Against Terrorism. 108th Cong., 2nd Sess., 3 February.Google Scholar
  44. Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (USA PATRIOT Act). 2001. 107th Cong., 1st Sess., HR 3162 RDS.Google Scholar
  45. Viscusi, W.K., & Zeckhauser, R.J. (2003). Sacrificing civil liberties to reduce terrorism risks. J. Risk Uncertain. 26(2/3), 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Von Hippel, K. (2002). The roots of terrorism: Probing the myths. In: L. Freedman (Ed.), Superterrorism: Policy Responses (pp. 25–39). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  47. Yeltsin, B. (1998). On the fight against terrorism. Federal Law of the Russian Federation, No. 130-FZ, July 25, 1998. Moscow: Kremlin.Google Scholar
  48. Zimmerman, D., & Wenger, A. (2007). Toward efficiency and legitimacy. In: D. Zimmerman & A. Wenger (Eds.), How States Fight Terrorism: Policy Dynamics in the West (pp. 203–229). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceKent State UniversityKentUSA

Personalised recommendations