Advertisement

Skin Tightening Off the Face with Radiofrequency and Broadband Light

  • Douglas Fife
  • Anthony Petelin
Chapter

Abstract

Radiofrequency (RF) devices and infrared broadband light (IBBL) are nonablative energy sources designed to volumetrically heat the dermis and subcutaneous tissue with the goal of skin tightening or girth reduction. They have been used successfully and safely in all skin types on the large areas of the body listed in Table 26.1. IBBL devices (wavelength 850-1350 nm or 1100-1800 nm) penetrate deeply to bulk-heat the dermis without melanin absorption. RF generates heat via the tissue resistance to an electric current passed through the skin, which causes tightening through presumed collagen remodeling. Unipolar (also called monopolar) RF systems use a ground electrode applied to an area of the body away from the current source and create a high power area at the electrode tip. Bipolar RF systems rely on two electrodes located within the handpiece.

Keywords

Bony Prominence Thick Skin Skin Tightening Skin Laxity Melanin Absorption 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Nissan Pilest, M.D., Robert Weiss, M.D., E. Victor Ross, M.D., Michael Kaminer, M.D. and Amy F. Taub, M.D. for sharing their expertise in the preparation of this chapter.

References

  1. 1.
    Dierickx C. The role of deep heating for noninvasive skin rejuvination. Lasers Surg Med 2006;38:799–387.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Goldberg D, Fazeli A, Berlin A. Clinical, Laboratory, and MRI analysis of cellulite treatment with a unipolar radiofrequency device. Dermatol Surg 2007;34:1–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kushikata N, Negishi K, Tezuka Y, Tezuka Y, Takeuchi K, Wakamatsu S. Is topical anesthesia useful in noninvasive skin tightening using radiofrequency? Dermatol Surg 2005;31:526–387.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kist D, Burns AJ, Sanner R, Counters J, Selickson B. Ultrastructural evaluation of multiple pass low energy versus single pass high energy radio-frequency treatment. Lasers Surg Med 2006;38:150–387.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sadick N, Sorhaindo L. The radiofrequency fronteir: a review of radiofrequency and combined radiofrequency pulsed-light technology in aesthetic medicine. Facial Plastic Surgery 2005;21:131–387.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sadick N, Magro C. A study evaluating the safety and efficacy of the velasmooth system in the treatment of cellulite. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2007;9:15–387.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Douglas Fife
    • 1
  • Anthony Petelin
    • 2
  1. 1.Surgical Dermatology and Laser CenterLas VegasUSA
  2. 2.Department of DermatologyUniversity of California at Irvine, College of MedicineIrvineUSA

Personalised recommendations