Noninvasive Body Rejuvenation

  • Amy Forman Taub


Noninvasive body rejuvenation is a nascent area of aesthetic medicine. Dominant past invasive procedures include liposuction, body lifts, and tummy tucks. The success of tissue tightening on the face in the past 5 years has led practitioners and researchers to explore this new frontier of body shaping. The main focus of body shaping is fat, whereas the focus of facial contouring is dermal. Thus, body shaping presents unique technical challenges that have not been encountered before. In addition, cellulite is a different pathophysiologic entity (Fig. 23.1) than either laxity or excess fat and cannot be addressed in the same fashion.


Body Shaping Facial Contour Graphic Overlay Dual Wavelength Laser Body Lift 


  1. 1.
    Wanitphakdeedecha R, Manuskiatti W. Treatment of cellulite with bipolar radiofrequency, infrared heat, and pulsatile suction device: a pilot study. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2006;5(4):284–387.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sadick N, Margo C. A study evaluating the safety and efficacy of the VelaSmooth system in the treatment of cellulite. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2007;9(1):15–387.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kulick M. Evaluation of the combination of radiofrequency, infrared energy and mechanical rollers with suction to improve skin surface irregularities (cellulite) in a limited treatment area. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2006;8:185–387.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boey G. Cellulite treatment with a radiofrequency, infrared light, and tissue manipulation combination device. Abstract. American Society of Dermatologic Surgery Annual Meeting, Oct. 2006.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Alster TS, Tanzi EL. Cellulite treatment using a novel combination radiofrequency, infrared light, and mechanical tissue manipulation device. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2005;7(2):81–387.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nootheti PK, Magpantay A, Yosowitz G, Calderon S, Goldman MP. A single center, randomized, comparative, prospective clinical study to determine the efficacy of the VelaSmooth system versus the Triactive system for the treatment of cellulite. Lasers Surg Med. 2006;38(10):908–387.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Khatri KA, Stol ML, et al. Effectiveness of Smoothshapes cellulite treatment as monitored with high-frequency ultrasound laser. Presented at the American Society of Laser Medicine and Surgery 2008 Annual Meeting, Orlando, FL.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Teitelbaum SA, Burns JL, Kubota J, et al. Noninvasive body contouring by focused ultrasound: safety and efficacy of the contour I device in a multicenter, controlled, clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120(3):779-789. discussion 790.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Moreno-Moraga J, Valero-Altes T, Riquelme AM, Isarria-Marcosy MI, de la Torre JR. Body contouring by non-invasive transdermal focused ultrasound. Lasers Surg Med. 2007;39(4):315–387.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Atkin D, Goldberg D, Kilmer S, et al. A multicenter study to assess the effectiveness of monopolar radioFrequency energy on the upper arm. Poster World Congr Dermatol. 2007.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    del Pino Emilia M, Rosado RH, Azuela A, et al. Effect of controlled volumetric tissue heating with radiofrequency on cellulite and the subcutaneous tissue of the buttocks and thighs. J Drugs Dermatol. 2006;5(8):714–387.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Goldberg DJ, Fazeli A, Berlin AL. Clinical laboratory, and MRI analysis of cellulite treatment with a unipolar radiofrequency device. Dermatol Surg. 2008;34(2):204–387.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amy Forman Taub
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Advanced Dermatology, SkinQRI and SkinfoLincolnshireUSA
  2. 2.Department of DermatologyNorthwestern University, Feinberg School of MedicineChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations