Ulua Marble Vases Abroad: Contextualizing Social Networks Between the Maya World and Lower Central America

  • Christina Luke


Long referred to as the Mesoamerican Frontier, the Ulua Valley of northwestern Honduras bridges the Maya Lowlands and Lower Central America. This study explores presenting the Ulua region in these foreign lands through the transfer of a luxury good: Late Classic marble vases. Rare in antiquity, these vases were produced in the heart of the Ulua Valley. Yet their importance as ambassadors of Uluan life in two very different spheres — central Maya and Nicoya-Guanacaste — suggests very diverse perceptions of what it meant to participate in a social network with the Ulua Valley. The multidimensionality of transferring a luxury good set within the context of a place and its people allows for a more nuanced understanding of the exotic.


Lower Central Luxury Good Marble Style Conceptual Landscape Portable Good 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Ahumada, A.T., and Velazquez de Leon Collins, J.A. (1999). Cuenco de alabastro con decoracion incisa procedente de bonampak. Mexicon, 21, 75-80.Google Scholar
  2. Ashmore, W. (1991). Site-planning principles and concepts of directionality among the ancient Maya. Latin American Antiquity, 2, 99-226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashmore, W. (2002). Decisions and dispositions: socializing spatial archaeology. American Anthropologist, 104(4), 1172-1183.Google Scholar
  4. Ashmore, W. and Knapp, A.B. (Eds.) (1999). Archaeologies of landscape: contemporary approaches. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  5. Aveni, A.F. (1980). Skywatchers of ancient Mexico. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  6. Barth, F. (1969). Ethnic groups and boundaries: the Social organization of culture difference. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
  7. Barth, F. (1987). Cosmologies in the making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bender, B. (1993). Landscapes: politics and perspectives. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  9. Benson, E.P. (1985). Architecture as metaphor. In M. Robinson and V. Fields (Eds.), Fifth Palenque round table, 1983 (pp. 183-188). San Francisco: Pre-Columbian Art Research Institute.Google Scholar
  10. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bourdieu, P. (1980). The logic of practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Bradley, R. (2000). Mental and material landscapes in prehistoric Britain. In D. Hooke (Ed.), Landscape: the richest historical record (pp. 1-11). SLS Supplementary Series 1. Amesbury: Society for Landscape Studies.Google Scholar
  13. Brady, J. (1997). Settlement configuration and cosmology: the role of caves at Dos Pilas. American Anthropologist, 99(3), 602-618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brady, J., and Ashmore, W. (1999). Mountains, caves, water: ideational landscapes of the ancient Maya. In W. Ashmore and A.B. Knapp (Eds.), Archaeologies of landscape: contemporary perspectives (pp. 124-155). Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  15. Brady, J., Scott, A., Neff, H., and Glascock, M. (1997). Speleothem breakage, movement, removal, and caching: an aspect of ancient Maya cave modification. Geoarchaeology, 12(6), 725-750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brady, J. and Prufer, K.M. (2005). In the maw of the earth monster. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  17. Bruchez, M.S. (2007). Artifacts that speak for themselves: sounds underfoot in Mesoamerica. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 26(1), 47-64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Clark, J.E., and Parry, W.J. (1990). Craft specialization and cultural complexity. Research in Economic Anthropology, 12, 289-346.Google Scholar
  19. Coggins, C.C. (1980). The shape of time: some political implications of a four-part figure. American Antiquity, 45, 727-739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cohen, A.P. (1984). The symbolic construction of communities. London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
  21. Conkey, M.W. (1989). Style and information in cultural evolution: toward a predictive model for the Paleolithic. In C.C. Lamberg-Karlowsky (Ed.) Archaeological thought in America, (pp. 135-52). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cosgrove, D. (1984). Social formation and symbolic landscape. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  23. Costin, C.L. (1991). Craft specialization: issues in defining, documenting, and explaining the organization of production. Archaeological Method and Theory, 3, 1-56.Google Scholar
  24. Dietler, M. and I. Herbich (1998). Habitus, techniques, style: an integrated approach to the social understanding of material culture and boundaries. In M. Stark (Ed.), The archaeology of social boundaries (pp. 232-263). Washington, DC.: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
  25. Fash, W. L. (1991). Scribes, warriors and kings. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
  26. Fisher, C. and Thurston, T.L. (1999). Dynamic landscapes and socio-political process: the topography of anthropogenic environments in global perspective. Antiquity, 73, 630-685.Google Scholar
  27. Garcia Moll, R. (1996). La ciudad en la selva: Yaxchilan, Chiapas. Arqueologia Mexicana, 4(22), 37-45.Google Scholar
  28. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: an outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  29. Goodby, R.G. (1998). Technological patterning and social boundaries: ceramic variability in southern New England, A.D. 1000-1675. In M. Stark (Ed.) The archaeology of social boundaries (pp. 161-182). Washington, DC.: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
  30. Gosden, C. (2006). Material culture and long-term change. In C. Tilley, W. Keane, and S. Küchler, M. Rowlands, and P. Spryer (Eds.), Handbook of material culture (pp. 425-442). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  31. Gosden, C. (1999). The cultural biography of objects. World Archaeology, 31(2), 169-178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gosden, C. (1989). Prehistoric social landscapes of the Arawe islands, West New Britain Province, Papua New Guinea. Archaeology in Oceania, 24(2), 45-58.Google Scholar
  33. Graham, E. (2002). The excavations of Altun Ha, Electronic document,, accessed February 12, 2008.
  34. Griffith, C.S, and Jack, S.M.P. (2005). Monumental modified speleothem sculpture: new patterns in a class of ancient Maya cave art. In J.K.K. Huang and E.V. Culley (Eds.) Making marks: graduate studies in rock art research at the new millennium (pp. 1-16). American Rock Art Research Association.Google Scholar
  35. Hellmuth, N. (1967). Structure 5D-73, Burial 196, Tikal, Peten, Guatemala, a preliminary report. Unpublished BA Honors Thesis, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  36. Henderson, J.S. (1992). Variations on a theme: a frontier view of Maya civilization. In E.C. Danien and R.J. Sharer (Eds.), New themes on the ancient Maya (pp. 161-171). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  37. Henderson, J.S. (1997). World of the ancient Maya. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Henderson, J.S., and Joyce, R.A. (2006). Brewing distinction: the development of cacao beverages in formative Mesoamerica. In C. McNeill (Ed.), Chocolate in Mesoamerica: a cultural history of cacao (pp. 140-153). Gainsville: University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
  39. Henderson, J.S., Joyce, R.A., Hall G.R., Hurst, W. J., and McGovern, P.E. (2007). The dawn of chocolate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104 (48), 18937-18940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hill, C. (1976). Cave minerals. Huntsville: National Speleological Society.Google Scholar
  41. Hill, J. (1992). The flower world of old Uto-Aztecan. Journal of Anthropological Research, 48, 117-144.Google Scholar
  42. Hodder, I. (1991). Reading the past: current approaches to interpretation in archaeology. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Houston, S.D. (2006). Impersonation, dance, and the problem of spectacle among the Classic Maya. In T. Inomata and L.S. Coben (Eds.), Archaeology of performance: theatres of power, community and politics (pp.135-155). Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
  44. Houston, S.D. (1998). Finding function and meaning in Classic Maya architecture. In S.D. Houston (Ed.), Function and meaning in Classic Maya architecture (pp. 519-538). Washington: Dumbarton Oaks.Google Scholar
  45. Houston, S., Stuart, D, and Taube, K. (2006). The memory of bones. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  46. Ingold, T. (2000). Making culture and weaving the world. In P. Graves-Brown (Ed.), Matter, materiality and modern culture (pp. 50-71). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. Inomata, T. (2001). The power and ideology of artistic creation: elite craft specialists in Classic Maya society. Current Anthropology, 42(3), 321-49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Inomata, T., Triadan, D., Ponciano, E., Terry, R, and Beaubien, H.F. (2001). The palace of the fallen king: the royal residential complex at Aguateca, Guatemala. Journal of Field Archaeology, 28(3-4), 287-306.Google Scholar
  49. Ishihara, R. (2007). Bridging the chasm between religion and politics: archaeological investigations of the grietas at the Late Classic Maya site of Aguateca, Peten, Guatemala. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Riverside.Google Scholar
  50. Joyce, R.A. (1986). Terminal classic interaction on the southeast Maya periphery. American Antiquity, 51(2), 313-29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Joyce, R.A. (1991). Cerro Palenque: power and identity on the Maya periphery. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  52. Joyce, R.A. (1993). The construction of the Mesoamerican frontier and the Mayoid image of Honduran polychromes. In M. Miller (Ed.), Reinterpreting prehistory of Central America (pp. 1-101). Boulder: University Press of Colorado.Google Scholar
  53. Joyce, R.A. (1996). Social dynamics of exchange: changing patterns in the Honduran archaeological record. In C.H. Langeback and F. Cardenas-Arroyo (Eds.), Chieftains, power and trade: regional interaction in the intermediate area of the Americas (pp. 31-46). Colombia: Departmento de Antropologia, Universidad de los Andes.Google Scholar
  54. Joyce, R.A. (2004). El estudio de los polícromos Uluas: Honduras en el mundo Maya. Paper presented at the VIII Seminario de Antropologia Hondureña, Tegucigalpa.Google Scholar
  55. Joyce, R.A., Hendon, J., and Lopiparo, J. (in press). Being in place: intersection of identity and experience on the Honduran landscape. In B. Bowser and N. Zedeño (Eds.), The archaeology of meaningful places. Provo: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar
  56. Joyce, R.A., and Henderson, J.S. (2007). From feasting to cuisine: implications of archaeological research in an early Honduran village. American Anthropologist, 109 (4), 642-653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kidder, A. (1947). Artifacts of Uaxactun. Washington: Carnegie Institution of Washington.Google Scholar
  58. Lawrence, D.S., and Low, S.M. (1990). The built environment and spatial form. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19, 453-505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Linares, E. (1997). Cuevas del Rio La Venta: un caso extradordinario de conservacion arqueologica en Chiapas, Mexico. In J.P. Laporte and H.L. Escobedo (Eds.), XI Simposio de investigaciones arqueologicas en Guatemala 1997 (pp. 467-78). Guatemala City: Ministerio de Cultura y Deportes, Instituto de Antropologia e Historia, Asociacion Tikal.Google Scholar
  60. Lazzari, M. (2005). The texture of things: objects, people and landscape in northwest Argentina. In L. Meskell (Ed.), Archaeologies of materiality (pp. 126-161). Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Looper, M. (2003). Lightning warrior. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  62. Lopiparo, J. (2003). Household ceramic production and the crafting of society in the Terminal Classic Ulúa Valley Honduras. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of California, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  63. Luke, C. (2002). Ulúa style marble vases. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Cornell University.Google Scholar
  64. Luke, C. (2003). Reporte sobre el estudio de los vasos de piedra blanca de Yucatán en Diciembre de 2002. México: Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia (INAH), Mérida.Google Scholar
  65. Luke, C. (2005). Travesía and the patronage of production of Classic period Ulúa marble vases. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Society for American Archaeology, Salt Lake City, Utah.Google Scholar
  66. Luke, C. (2008). Carving luxury: Late Classic white stone vase traditions in Mesoamerica. In Y.M. Rowan and J.R. Ebeling (Eds.), New approaches to old stones: recent studies of ground stone artifacts (pp. 298-319). London: Equinox Books.Google Scholar
  67. Luke, C. (n.d.). Memorializing landscape on Ulúa-style marble vases. In Y. Rowan (Ed.), Beyond belief: archaeology of religion and ritual. Washington: American Anthropological Association (in preparation).Google Scholar
  68. Luke, C., Joyce, R.A., Henderson, J.S., and Tykot, R.H. (2003). Marble carving traditions in Honduras: Formative through Terminal Classic. In L. Lazzarini (Ed.), ASMOSIA 6, interdisciplinary studies on ancient stone — proceedings of the sixth international conference of the association for the study of marble and other stones in antiquity, Venice, June 15-18, 2000 (pp. 485-496). Padova: Bottega d’Erasmo,.Google Scholar
  69. Luke, C., and Tykot, R.H. (2007). Celebrating place through luxury craft production: Travesìa and Ulua style marble vases. Ancient Mesoamerica, 18, 315-328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Luke, C., Tykot, R.H., and Scott, R.W. (2006). Petrographic and stable isotope analyses of Late Classic Ulúa marble vases and potential sources. Archaeometry, 48 (1), 13-29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. McAnany, P. (1998). Ancestors and the Classic Maya built environment. In S.D. Houston (Ed.), Function and meaning in Classic Maya architecture (pp. 271-298). Washington, DC.: Dumbarton Oaks.Google Scholar
  72. Meskell, L. (Ed.) (2005). Archaeologies of materiality. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  73. Miller, M., and Martin, S. (2004). Courtly art of the ancient Maya. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
  74. Morris, C. (1995). Symbols to power: styles and media in the Inka state. In C. Carr, and J.E. Neitzel, (Eds.), Style, society and person (pp. 419-433). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  75. Moholy-Nagy, H., and Ladd, J. (1992). Objects of stone, shell, and bone. In C.C. Coggins (Ed.), Artifacts from the Cenote of Sacrifice: Chichen Izta, Yuacatan, textiles, basketry, stone, bone, shell, ceramics, wood, copal, rubber, other organic materials and mammalian remains (pp. 99-152). Cambridge, MA: Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  76. Pendergast, D.M. (1990). Excavations at Altun Ha, Belize, volume 2. Toronto: Royal Ontario Museum.Google Scholar
  77. Pendergast, D.M. (1982). Excavations at Altun Ha, Belize, volume 3. Toronto: Royal Ontario Museum.Google Scholar
  78. Peterson, P., McAnany, P. A., and Cobb, A. B. (2005). De-fanging the Earth Monster: speleothem transport to surface sites in the Sibun Valley. In K.M. Prufer and J.E. Brady (Eds.), Stone houses and earth lords: Maya religion in the cave context (pp. 227-248). Boulder: University Press of Colorado.Google Scholar
  79. Pred, A. (1984). Place as historically contingent process: structuration and the time-geography of becoming places. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 74(2), 279-297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Rodman, M. (1992). Empowering place: multilocality and multivocality. American Anthropologist, 94(3), 640-656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Ruz Lhuillier, A. (1954). Uxmal: temporada de trabajos 1951-1952. Mexico: Anales del Instituto Nacional de Antropologia e Historia.Google Scholar
  82. Saunders, N.J. (2003). “Catching the light”: technologies of power and enchantment in Pre-Columbian goldworking. In J. Quilter and J.W. Hoopes (Ed.), Gold and power in ancient Costa Rica, Panama and Colombia (pp. 14-48). Washington, DC.: Dumbarton Oaks.Google Scholar
  83. Schele, L. (1998). The iconography of Maya architectural façades during the Late Classic period. In S.D. Houston (Ed.), Function and meaning in Classic Maya architecture (pp. 479-517). Washington, DC.: Dumbarton Oaks.Google Scholar
  84. Schele, L. and Friedel, D. (1991). The courts of creation: ballcourts, ballgames, and portals to the Maya otherworld. In V. Scarborough and D. Wilcox (Eds), The Mesoamerican ballgame (pp. 289-317). Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
  85. Schele, L., and Miller, M.E. (1986). Blood of kings. Fortworth: Kimball Art Museum.Google Scholar
  86. Sheptak, R.N. (1987). Interaction between Belize and the Ulúa valley. In E.J. Robinson (Ed.), Interaction on the southeast Mesoamerican frontier: prehistoric and historic Honduras and El Salvador, (pp. 247-266). Oxford: BAR International Series 327.Google Scholar
  87. Stone, A. (2005). Divine stalagmites: modified speleothems in Maya caves and aesthetic variation in Classic Maya art. In T. Heyd and J. Clegg (Eds.), Aesthetics and rock art (pp. 215-234). Surrey: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
  88. Stone, D.Z. (1938). Masters in marble. Middle American Research Series, Pub. 8, Pt.1. New Orleans: Middle American Research Institute, Tulane University.Google Scholar
  89. Stone, D.Z. (1941). Archaeology of the north coast of Honduras. Memoirs of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University. Vol. IX, no. 1. Cambridge: Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  90. Stone, D.Z. (1972). Pre-Columbian man finds Central America. Cambridge: Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  91. Stone, D.Z. (1977). Pre-Columbian man in Costa Rica. Cambridge: Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  92. Taube, K. (2004). Flower mountain: concepts of life, beauty and paradise among the Classic Maya. RES: Anthropology and Aesthetics, 45, 69-98.Google Scholar
  93. Thomas, J. (1993). The politics of vision and the archaeologies of landscape. In B. Bender (Ed.), Landscape: politics and perspective (pp. 19-48). Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  94. Thompson, E.H. (1938). The high priest’s grave at Chichén Itzá, Yucatán, Mexico. Anthropological Series Field Museum of Natural History Anthropological Series 412, vol. 27, no. 1. Chicago: Field Museum of Natural History.Google Scholar
  95. Thompson, E.H. (1939). Excavations at San Jose, British Honduras. Publication No. 506. Washington: Carnegie Institution.Google Scholar
  96. Tilley, C. (1994). A phenomenology of landscape: places, paths and monuments. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  97. Vargas de la Pena, L., and Castillo, V.R.. (2001a). Hallazgos recientes en Ek’ Balam. Mexicon 23(3), 55-56.Google Scholar
  98. Vargas de la Pena, L., and Castillo V.R. (2001b). El mausoleo de Ukit Kan Le’K Tok. Las Investigadores de la Cultura Maya, 9(1), 144-50.Google Scholar
  99. Vogt, E.Z. (1964). Ancient Maya and contemporary Tzotzil cosmology: a comment on some methodological problems. American Antiquity, 30, 192-195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Vogt, E.Z. (1969). Zinacantan: a Maya community in the highlands of Chiapas. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  101. Vogt, E.Z. (1981). some aspects of the sacred geography of highland Chiapas. In E.P. Benson (Ed.), Mesoamerican sites and world views (pp. 119-42). Washington, DC.: Dumbarton Oaks.Google Scholar
  102. Wiessner, P. (1983). Style and social information in Kalahari San projectile points. American Antiquity, 48, 254-76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Wiessner, P. (1989). Style and changing relations between the individual and society. In I. Hodder (Ed.), The meaning of things (pp. 56-63). London: Unwin and Hyman.Google Scholar
  104. Wiessner, P. (1990). Is there unity to style? In M. Conkey and C.A. Hastorf (Eds), The uses of style in archaeology (pp. 105-112). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,.Google Scholar
  105. Wobst, H. M. (1977). Stylistic behavior and information exchange. In C.E. Cleland (Ed.), For the director: research essays in honor of James B. Griffin Museum of Anthropology Papers 61 (pp. 317-42). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  106. Wright, R. (1993). Technological styles: transforming a material into a cultural object. In S. Lubar and W.D. Kingery (Eds.), History from things: essays on material culture, (pp. 242-69). Washington, DC.: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Boston UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations