Stress Valuation and the Experience of Parenting Stress in Late Life



Pearlin’s stress process model serves as an organizing instrument for the study of mental health by delineating the pathways by which stress is both created and subsequently influences mental health. In its most recent iteration (Pearlin 1999), the model emphasizes the sociological study of stress by bringing attention to the way in which social status is endemic to each aspect of the stress process. As Pearlin (1999) states, “the social and economic statuses of people are imposed on the stress process. It is these characteristics that make the model and the orientation to stress research it embodies quintessentially sociological” (p. 397). Thus, core social statuses such as race, class, and gender are seen as both conditioning exposure to stress, as well as the direct and indirect paths by which stress influences mental health.

Although social statuses are central to a sociological perspective, such statuses are only one aspect of the socially-situated experience of stress. In fact, across Pearlin’s work there is a wider and more nuanced examination of different aspects of socially-based influences on the stress process. In an earlier work, Pearlin highlighted an additional set of socially conditioned factors, on which it was argued the stress process was contingent. Pearlin argued that for researchers who seek to understand the experience of stress, the values of individuals must also be considered. According to Pearlin (1989, p. 249), “By values I refer to what is defined socially as good, desirable, and prized or something to be eschewed.” As these are defined socially, values are conceived of in explicitly social, rather than psychological terms. These socially constituted judgments are critical in the process of stress formation because, “Values, I believe, regulate the meaning and the importance of the experience” (Pearlin 1989, p. 249). Thus, socially-constituted values serve as a regulating agent by helping to define both whether an experience will be seen as noxious or adverse, as well as the importance of the experience.

The purpose of this paper is to call attention to the process by which socially-based values lead individuals to experience social circumstances as both salient and stressful, a process I refer to as stress valuation. To underscore the sociological nature of stress valuation, I synthesize Pearlin’s focus on social values with insights from social constructionist and life course perspectives. A social constructionist perspective is useful for emphasizing the social nature of stress valuation because this perspective underscores the way in which judgments of worth and meaning are derived from individual embeddedness in social groupings (Holstein and Gubrium 2007). A life course perspective is also helpful for understanding the process of stress valuation because, rather than viewing development as a series of concrete and chronologically-delimited stages, a life course perspective views development as a fluid trajectory which occurs throughout one’s life (Elder et al. 2003). Thus, an integration of a life course perspective with the concept of stress valuation suggests that values may continue to play an important role in shaping the experience of stress across the life course because individuals face new developmental challenges and opportunities as they age.


Adult Child Late Life Full Information Maximum Likelihood Stress Process Dichotomous Indicator 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This study is supported by a National Institute of Aging grant award (AG17461; Leonard I. Pearlin, Principal Investigator).


  1. Ajrouch, K. J., Antonucci, T. C., & Janevic, M. R. (2001). Social networks among Blacks and whites: The interaction between race and age. Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 56, S112–S118.Google Scholar
  2. Allison, P. (2003). Missing data techniques for structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 545–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berger, P. L. (1967). The sacred canopy: Elements of a sociological theory of religion. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  4. Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  5. Conroy, D., Metzler, J., & Hofer, S. (2003). Factorial invariance and latent mean stability of performance failure appraisals. Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 401–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davis, N. J., & Robinson, R. V. (1996). Are the rumors of war exaggerated? Religious orthodoxy and moral progressivism in the United States. American Journal of Sociology, 102, 756–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Due, P., Holstein, B., Lund, R., Modvig, J., & Avlund, K. (1999). Social relations: network, support and relational strain. Social Science and Medicine, 48, 661–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Durkheim, E. (1964). The elementary forms of the religious life (J. Swain, Trans.). New York: Free Press. (Original work published 1915).Google Scholar
  9. Elder, G. H., Jr., Johnson, M. K., & Crosnoe, R. (2003). The emergence and development of life course theory. In J. T. Mortimer & M. J. Shanahan (Eds.), Handbook of the life course (pp. 3–19). New York: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ellison, C., & Sherkat, D. (1993). Obedience and autonomy: Religion and parental values reconsidered. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 32, 313–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hall, S. (1985). Signification, representation, ideology: Althusser and the post-structuralist debates. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 2, 91–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hamilton, M. B. (1995). The sociology of religion: Theoretical and comparative perspectives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (2007). Constructionist perspectives on the life course. Sociology Compass, 1, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ikkink, K. K., van Tilburg, T., & Knipscheer, K. C. P. M. (1999). Perceived instrumental support exchanges in relationships between elderly parents and their adult children: Normative and structural explanations (in intergenerational relations). Journal of Marriage and Family, 61, 831–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Krause, N. (2007). Social involvement in religious institutions and God-mediated control beliefs: A longitudinal investigation. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 46, 519–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu, X., & Kaplan, H. B. (2001). Role strain and illicit drug use: The moderating influence of commitment to conventional values. Journal of Drug Issues, 31, 833–856.Google Scholar
  17. Long, J. S., & Pavalko, E. K. (2004). Comparing alternative measures of functional limitations. Medical Care, 42, 19–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Marx, K. (1975). On religion. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
  20. McGuire, M. (1997). Religion: The social context (4th ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  21. Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Milkie, M., Bierman, A., & Schieman, S. (2008). How adult children influence older parents’ mental health: Integrating stress process and life course perspectives. Social Psychology Quarterly, 71, 86–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Morgan, D. A. (1988). Age differences in social network participation. Journals of Gerontology, 43, S129–S137.Google Scholar
  24. Nelson, T. J. (1997). He made a way out of no way: Religious experience in an African-American congregation. Review of Religious Research, 39, 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Neugarten, B. L., & Datan, N. (1973). Sociological perspectives on the life course. In P. B. Baltes & S. K. Warner (Eds.), Life-span developmental psychology: Personality and socialization (pp. 53–69). London: Academic Press, Inc.Google Scholar
  26. Pargament, K. I., Magyar, G. M., Benore, E., & Mahoney, A. M. (2005). Sacrilege: A study of sacred loss and desecration and their implications for health and well-being in a community sample. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 44, 59–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pearlin, L. I. (1999). The stress process revisited: Reflections on concepts and their interrelationships. In C. S. Aneshensel & J. C. Phelan (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of mental health (pp. 395–415). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  28. Pearlin, L. I. (1989). The sociological study of stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 30, 241–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pearlin, L. I. (1975). Status inequality and stress in marriage. American Sociological Review, 40, 344–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pearlin, L. I., & Skaff, M. M. (1996). Stress and the life course: A paradigmatic alliance. The Gerontologist, 36, 239–247.Google Scholar
  31. Sales, A. E., Plomondon, M. E., Magid, D. J., Spertus, J. A., & Rumsfeld, J. A. (2004). Assessing response bias from missing quality of life data: The Heckman method. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2.Google Scholar
  32. Schieman, S., & Bierman, A. (2007). Religious activities and changes in the sense of divine control: Dimensions of social stratification as contingencies. Sociology of Religion, 68, 361–381.Google Scholar
  33. Schieman, S., Pudrovska, T., & Milkie, M. (2005). The sense of divine control and the self-concept: A study of race differences in late life. Research on Aging, 27, 165–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schieman, S., Pudrovska, T., Pearlin, L., & Ellison, C. (2006). The sense of divine control and psychological distress: Variations across race and socioeconomic status. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 45, 529–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Simon, R. W. (1997). The meanings individuals attach to role identities and their implications for mental health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 38, 256–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Starks, B., & Robinson, R. V. (2007). Moral cosmology, religion, and adult values for children. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 46, 17–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ulbrich, P. M. (1988). The determinants of depression in two-income marriages. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 121–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Umberson, D. (1992). Relationships between adult children and their parents: psychological consequences for both generations. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 664–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wheaton, B. (1999). Social stress. In C. S. Aneshensel & J. C. Phelan (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of mental health (pp. 277–300). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  40. Zhan, H. J. (2006). Joy and sorrow: Explaining chinese caregivers’ reward and stress. Journal of Aging Studies, 20, 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada

Personalised recommendations