Global Warming pp 147-159 | Cite as

Environmental Benefits of Geothermal-Based Absorption Cooling Systems

  • Can Coskun
  • Zuhal Oktay
  • Ibrahim Dincer
Part of the Green Energy and Technology book series (GREEN)

Environmental problems have become more apparent through a continuously growing range of pollutants, hazards, and ecosystem degradation over wider areas. Although the most significant air pollution problems were acid precipitation, stratospheric ozone depletion, and global climate change, the focus has been on global warming due to drastic increase in greenhouse gas emissions and their immediate results through catastrophic climate changes/events.


Heat Exchanger Geothermal Fluid Lithium Bromide Geothermal Source Refrigerant Vapor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Akpınar, A, Kömürcü, M İ, Önsoy H, and Kaygusuz K, (2008). Status of geothermal energy amongst Turkey’s energy sources. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 12: 1148–1161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bertani, R, Thain, I (2002) Geothermal power generating plant CO2 emission survey. IGA Newsletter 49: 1–3.Google Scholar
  3. Bassols, J, Kuckelkorn, B, Langreck, J, Schneider, R and Veelken, H (2002) Trigeneration in the food industry. Apply Therm. Eng. 22 (6):595–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Misra, RD, Sahoo, PK and Gupta, A (2006) Thermoeconomic evaluation and optimization of an aqua-ammonia vapour-absorption refrigeration system. Int J Refrig. 29(1):47–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Oktay, Z, Aslan, A, (2007a). Geothermal district heating in Turkey: The Gonen case study. Geothermics 36:167–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Oktay, Z, Coskun, C, Dincer, I, (2007b) Performance analysis of the Bigadic geothermal district heating system. International 3th Energy, Exergy and Environment Symposium.Google Scholar
  7. Oktay, Z, and Dincer, I (2007c) Energetic, Exergetic, Economic and Environmental Assessments of the Bigadic Geothermal District Heating System. International Journal of Green Energy 4: 549–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Pegues, J (2002) The benefits of 8760 hour-by-hour building energy analysis. Carrier Software Systems. New York, USA: HVAC Systems Engineer.Google Scholar
  9. Saravanan, R and Maiya, MP (1998) Thermodynamic comparison of waterbased working fluid combinations for a vapor absorption refrigeration system. Apply Therm Eng 18(7):553–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Sozen, A (2001) Effect of heat exchangers on performance of absorption refrigeration systems. Energy Convers Management 42(14):1699–1716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Sun, DW (1998) Comparison of the performance of NH3–H2O, NH3–LiNO3 and NH3–NaSCN absorption refrigeration systems. Energ Convers 39(5/6):357–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Yazaki Energy Systems (2008). Water Fired Chiller/Chiller-Heater, Yazaki Energy Systems, Inc., Texas, USA, Accessed at

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Can Coskun
    • 1
  • Zuhal Oktay
    • 1
  • Ibrahim Dincer
    • 2
  1. 1.Balikesir UniversityBalikesirTurkey
  2. 2.Cleanfield Energy, IncAncasterCanada

Personalised recommendations