Advertisement

Global Warming pp 385-398 | Cite as

Sustainable Construction Practices in Malaysia

  • Nazirah Zainul Abidin
Chapter
Part of the Green Energy and Technology book series (GREEN)

Abstract

A building occupies land, alters the ground and vegetation, prevents the percolation of rainwater into the ground, interrupts the flow of wildlife through the area, and consumes resources, labor, materials, and fuel.

Keywords

Construction Industry Sustainable Practice Malaysian Government Sustainable Project Construction Practitioner 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgment

The author acknowledges the financial support provided by the Science University of Malaysia (USM) in Penang, Malaysia.

References

  1. Bartlett, E, Howard, N (2000) Informing the decision makers on the cost and value of green building. Building Research and Information 28 (5/6): 315–324.Google Scholar
  2. Centre for Environment, Technology and Development, Malaysia (CETDEM) (2006) DDC project – demonstration and documentation centre for sustainable urban household energy usage. http://www.cetdem.org.my/sustainable_energy/ddc.html.
  3. Construction Industry Development Board (CIDB) (2000) Malaysian construction industry: Technology foresight report. CIDB Malaysia and APEC Technology Foresight Center. Bangkok.Google Scholar
  4. Construction Industry Development Board (CIDB) (2006) http://www.cidb.gov.my.
  5. Eight Malaysia Plan (2001) Eight Malaysia Plan 2001–2005. Kuala Lumpur: Percetakan Nasional Malaysia.Google Scholar
  6. Heerwagen, J (2000) Green building, organizational success and occupant productivity. Building Research and Information 28(5/6): 353–367.Google Scholar
  7. Holcim Foundation for Sustainable Construction (2006) http://www.holcim.com.my.
  8. Hydes, K, Creech, L (2000) Reducing mechanical equipment cost: the economics of green design. Building Research and Information 28(5/6): 403–407.Google Scholar
  9. Kibert, CJ (1994) Establishing principles and a model for sustainable construction. Proceedings of the First International Conference of CIB Task Group 16 on Sustainable Construction. Tampa, FL, 6–9 November, Final Session, pp. 3–12.Google Scholar
  10. Malaysia Energy Centre (PTM) (2006) A Zero Energy Office (ZEO) Building. http://www.ptm.org.my/PTM_Building/Index.htm, Accessed on 5/3/2006.
  11. Malaysian Science and Technology Information Centre (MASTIC) (2006) http://www.mastic.gov.my.
  12. National Institute of Valuation, Malaysia (INSPEN) (2006) http://www.inspen.gov.my.
  13. Pettifer, G (2004) Gifford studios – A case study in commercial green construction. CIBSE National Conference on Delivering Sustainable Construction. 29–30 September., London.Google Scholar
  14. Star Special (2006) 9th Malaysia Plan 2006 – 2010. The Star. page SP 2, 1st April 2006Google Scholar
  15. Tanarimba Development (2006) http://tanarimba.com.my.
  16. Yates, A (2001) Quantifying the business benefits of sustainable buildings – Summary of existing research finds (Extract) (Draft for discussion). Centre for Sustainable Construction. London: BRE.Google Scholar
  17. Zainul Abidin, N (2005) Using value management to improve the consideration of sustainability within construction, Ph.D. Thesis, Loughborough University, UK.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nazirah Zainul Abidin
    • 1
  1. 1.University Science of MalaysiaPenangMalaysia

Personalised recommendations