Bioprocess Intensification of Beer Fermentation Using Immobilised Cells

  • Pieter J. Verbelen
  • Viktor A. NedovićEmail author
  • Verica Manojlović
  • Freddy R. Delvaux
  • Ida Laskošek-Čukalović
  • Branko Bugarski
  • Ronnie Willaert


Beer production with immobilised yeast has been the subject of research for approximately 30 years but has so far found limited application in the brewing industry, due to engineering problems, unrealised cost advantages, microbial contaminations and an unbalanced beer flavor (Linko et al. 1998; Brányik et al. 2005; Willaert and Nedović 2006). The ultimate aim of this research is the production of beer of desired quality within 1–3 days. Traditional beer fermentation systems use freely suspended yeast cells to ferment wort in an unstirred batch reactor. The primary fermentation takes approximately 7 days with a subsequent secondary fermentation (maturation) of several weeks. A batch culture system employing immobilization could benefit from an increased rate of fermentation. However, it appears that in terms of increasing productivity, a continuous fermentation system with immobilization would be the best method (Verbelen et al. 2006). An important issue of the research area is whether beer can be produced by immobilised yeast in continuous culture with the same characteristic as the traditional method.

In beer production, as opposed to a process such as bio-ethanol production, the goal is to achieve a particular balance of different secondary metabolites rather than the attainment of high yields of one product. Any alterations of the fermentation procedure can thus have serious implications on the flavor profile. At present, only beer maturation and alcohol-free beer production are obtained by means of commercial-scale immobilised yeast reactors, because in these processes no real yeast growth is required. Immobilised cell physiology control and fine-tuning of the flavor compounds formation during long-term fermentation processes remain the major challenges for successful application of immobilised cell technology on an industrial scale. The key factors for the implementation of this technology on an industrial level are carrier materials, immobilization technology and bioreactor design.

The purpose of this chapter is to summarise and discuss the main cell immobilization methods, process requirements, available carrier materials and bioreactor designs aimed for better yeast physiology control and fine-tuning of the flavor formation during beer fermentation process. Further, it will provide an overview on the latest important breakthroughs, accomplished in understanding of the effects of immobilization on yeast physiology, metabolism and fermentation behaviour.


Cell Immobilization Carrier Material Free Amino Nitrogen Beer Production Beer Fermentation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This work was supported by the Belgian Federal Science Policy Office, European Space Agency PRODEX program, the Institute for the Promotion of Innovation through Science and Technology in Flanders (IWT Vlaanderen), Serbian Ministry of Science and Technological Development (#371005 & #142075), Flanders Interuniversity Institute for Biotechnology (VIB) and the Research Council of the VUB.


  1. Aivasidis A (1996) Another look at immobilized yeast systems. Cerevisia 21(1):27–32Google Scholar
  2. Aivasidis A, Wandrey C, Eils H-G, Katzke M (1991) Continuous fermentation of alcohol-free beer with immobilized yeast cells in fluidized bed reactors. In: Proceedings European brewery convention congress, pp 569–576Google Scholar
  3. Andersen K, Bergin J, Ranta B, Viljava T (1999) Main fermentation of beer. In: Proceedings of the 27th European brewery convention congress, pp 771–778Google Scholar
  4. Andries M, Van Beveren PC, Goffin O, Masschelein CA (1996) Design and application of an immobilized loop bioreactor for continuous beer fermentation. In: Wijffels RH, Buitelaar RM, Bucke C, Tramper J (eds) Immobilized cells: Basics and applications. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 672–678Google Scholar
  5. Baillie GS, Douglas LJ (1999) Role of dimorphism in the development of Candida albicans biofilms. J Med Microbiol 48:671–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bamforth CW, Kanauchi M (2004) Enzymology of vicinal diketone reduction in brewers’ yeast. J Inst Brew 110(2):83–93Google Scholar
  7. Bardi E, Koutinas AA, Kanellaki M (1997) Room and low temperature brewing with yeast immobilized on gluten pellets. Process Biochem 32:691–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baron GV, Willaert RG (2004) Cell immobilization in pre-formed porous matrices. In: Nedovic V, Willaert R (eds) Fundamentals of cell immobilization biotechnology. Kluwer Academic Plubishers, The Netherlands, pp 229–244Google Scholar
  9. Bezbradica D, Obradovic B, Leskosek-Cukalovic I, Bugarski B, Nedovic V (2007) Immobilization of yeast cells in PVA particles for beer fermentation. Process Biochem 42(9):1348–1351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bidard F, Blondin B, Dequin S, Vezinhet F, Barre P (1994) Cloning and analysis of a FLO5 flocculation gene from Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast. Curr Gentetics 25:196–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bidard F, Bony M, Blondin B, Dequin S, Barre P (1995) The Saccharomyces cerevisiae FLO1 flocculation gene encodes for a cell surface protein. Yeast 11:809–822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bony M, Thines-Sempoux D, Barre P, Blondin B (1997) Localisation and cell surface anchoring of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae flocculation protein Flo1p. J Bacteriol 179:4929–4936Google Scholar
  13. Brányik T, Vicente AA, Machado Cruz JM, Teixeira JA (2001) Spent grains – a new support for brewing yeast immobilization. Biotechnol Lett 23:1073–1078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brányik T, Vicente A, Cruz JM, Teixeira J (2002) Continuous primary beer fermentation with brewing yeast immobilized on spent grains. J Inst Brew 108:410–415Google Scholar
  15. Brányik T, Vicente AA, Cruz JMM, Texeira JA (2004a) Continuous primary fermentation of beer with yeast immobilized on spent grains – the effect of operational conditions. J Am Soc Brew Chem 62:29–34Google Scholar
  16. Brányik T, Vicente AA, Kuncová G, Podrasky O, Dostálek P, Teixeira J (2004b) Growth model and metabolic activity of brewing yeast biofilm on the surface of spent grains: a biocatalyst for continuous beer fermentation. Biotechnol Prog 20:1733–1740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Brányik T, Vicente AA, Dostálek P, Teixeira JA (2005) Continuous beer fermentation using immobilized yeast cell bioreactor systems. Biotechnol Prog 21(3):653–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Brányik T, Silva DP, Vicente AA, Lehnert R, Almeida e Silva JB, Dostálek P, Teixeira JA (2006a) Continuous immobilized yeast reactor system for complete beer fermentation using spent grains and corncobs as carrier materials. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 33:1010–1018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Brányik T, Vicente AA, Dostálek P, Teixeira J (2006b) Flavor formation in continuous fermentations. Proceedings Chair De Clerck, Leuven, p 15pGoogle Scholar
  20. Caro LH, Tettelin H, Vossen JH, Ram AF, Van den Ende H, Klis FM (1997) In silicio identification of glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol-anchored plasma-membrane and cell wall proteins of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 13:1477–1489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chen EC-H (1978) The relative contribution of Ehrlich and biosynthetic pathways to the formation of fusel alcohols. J Am Soc Brew Chem 36(1):39–43Google Scholar
  22. Collin S, Montesinos M, Meersman E, Swinkels W, Dufour JP (1991) Yeast dehydrogenase activities in relation to carbonyl compounds removal from wort and beer. In: Proceedings European brewery convention congress, pp 409–416Google Scholar
  23. Cop J, Dyon D, Iserentant D, Masschelein CA (1989) Reactor design optimization with a view on the improvement of amino acid utilization and flavor development of calcium-alginate entrapped brewing yeast fermentations. In: Proceedings of the 22nd European brewery convention, Zurich, pp 315–322Google Scholar
  24. Cormack BP, Ghori N, Falkow S (1999) An adhesin of the yeast pathogen Candida glabrata mediating adherence to human epithelial cells. Science 285(5427):578–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Coutts MW (1957) A continuous process for the production of beer. UK Patent 872,391400Google Scholar
  26. Cross PA, Mavituna F (1987) Yeast retention fermentors for beer production. In: Proceedings of the 4th European congress on biotechnology, Amsterdam, pp 199–200Google Scholar
  27. Curin J, Pardonova M, Sedova H, Kahler M (1987) Beer production with immobilized yeast. Proceedings of the 21th EBC congress, pp 433–440Google Scholar
  28. De Groot PWJ, Hellingwerf KJ, Klis FM (2003) Genome-wide identification of fungal GPI proteins. Yeast 20:781–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Decamps C, Norton S, Poncelet D, Neufeld RJ (2004) Continuous pilot plant-scale immobilization of yeast in κ-carrageenan gel beads. AIChE J 50:1599–1605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Depraetere SA, Winderickx J, Delvaux FR (2003) Evaluation of the oxygen requirement of lager and ale yeast strains by preoxygenation. Master Brewers Assoc Americas Tech Quarterly 40(4):283–289Google Scholar
  31. Doran PM, Bailey JE (1986) Effects of immobilization on growth, fermentation properties, and molecular composition of Saccharomyces cerevisiae attached to gelatin. Biotechnol Bioeng 28:73–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Dufour JP, Devreux A (1986) The use of amino acids analysis as a tool to control malting and brewing processes. EBC Symposium on Wort Production, Monograph XI. Nürnberg, pp. 227–248Google Scholar
  33. Dunbar J, Campbell SI, Banks DJ, Warren DR (1988) Metabolic aspects of a commercial continuous fermentation system. In: Proceedings of the 20th convention of the institute of brewing (Asia and New Zealand Section), pp 151–158Google Scholar
  34. Frieman MB, Cormack BP (2003) The omega-site sequence of glycosylphosphatidyl-inositol-anchored proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae can determine distribution between the membrane and the cell wall. Mol Microbiol 50:883–896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Fu Y, Ibrahim AS, Sheppard DC, Chen YC, French SW, Cutler JE, Filler SG, Edwards JE Jr (2002) Candida albicans Als1p: an adhesin that is a downstream effector of the EFG1 filamentation pathway. Mol Microbiol 44:61–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Fukuda K, Yamamoto N, Kiyokawa Y, Yanagiuchi T, Wakai Y, Kitamoto K, Inoue Y, Kimura A (1998) Balance of activities of alcohol acetyltransferase and esterase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is important for production of isoamyl acetate. Appl Environ Microbiol 64(10):4076–4078Google Scholar
  37. Galazzo JL, Bailey JE (1990) Fermentation pathway kinetics and metabolic flux control in suspended and immobilized Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Enzyme Microb Technol 12:162–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gaur NK, Klotz SA (1997) Expression, cloning, and characterization of a Candida albicans gene, ALA1, that confers adherence properties upon Saccharomyces cerevisiae for extracellular matrix proteins. Infect Immun 65:5289–5294Google Scholar
  39. Green CB, Cheng G, Chandra J, Mukherjee P, Ghannoum MA, Hoyer LL (2004) T-PCR detection of Candida albicans ALS gene expression in the reconstituted human epithelium (RHE) model of oral candidiasis and in model biofilms. Microbiology 150:267–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Guo B, Styles CA, Feng Q, Fink GA (2000) A Saccharomyces gene family involved in invasive growth, cell–cell adhesion, and mating. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:12158–12163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hammond JRM (1995) Genetically-modified brewing yeast for the 21st century. Progress to date. Yeast 11:1613–1627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hanneman W (2002) Reducing beer maturation time and retaining quality. Master Brewers Assoc Americas Tech Quarterly 39(3):149–155Google Scholar
  43. Hayes AH, Power J, Ryder DS (1991) Immobilized cell technology for brewing: A progress report. Brewers Dig 66(11):28–33Google Scholar
  44. Hegarty PK, Parsons R, Bamforth CW, Molzahn SW (1995) Phenyl ethanol – a factor determining lager character. In: Proceedings of the 25th European brewery convention, pp 515–522Google Scholar
  45. Hoyer LL (2001) The ALS gene family of Candida albicans. Trends Microbiol 9:176–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hoyer LL, Payne TL, Hecht JE (1998) Identification of Candida albicans ALS2 and ALS4 and localization of ALS proteins to the fungal cell surface. J Bacteriol 180:5334–5343Google Scholar
  47. Hsu W-P, Bernstein L (1985) A new type of bioreactor employing immobilized yeast. J Am Soc Brew Chem 43:101–103Google Scholar
  48. Inoue T (1995) Development of a two-stage immobilized yeast fermentation system for continuous beer brewing. In: Proceedings European brewery convention congress, pp 25–36Google Scholar
  49. Jin YL, Speers RA (1999) Flocculation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Food Res Int 31:421–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Jones M, Pierce JS (1964) Absorption of amino acids from wort by yeasts. J Inst Brew 70:307–315Google Scholar
  51. Karel SF, Libicki SB, Robertson CR (1985) The immobilization of whole cells: engineering principles. Chem Eng Sci 40:1321–1353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kobayashi O, Hayashi N, Kuroki R, Sone H (1998) Region of Flo1 proteins responsible for sugar recognition. J Bacteriol 180:6503–6510Google Scholar
  53. Kronlöf J, Linko M (1992) Production of beer using immobilized yeast encoding α-acetolactate decarboxylase. J Inst Brew 98:479–491Google Scholar
  54. Kronlöf J, Virkajärvi I (1999) Primary fermentation with immobilized yeast. In: Proceedings European brewery convention congress, pp 761–770Google Scholar
  55. Kronlöf J, Härkönen T, Hartwall P, Home S, Linko M (1989) Main fermentation with immobilized yeast. In: Proceedings of the 22nd European brewery convention, Zurich, pp 355–362Google Scholar
  56. Kronlöf J, Virkajärvi I, Storgards EL, Londesborough J, Dymond G (2000) Combined primary and secondary fermentation with immobilized yeast. In: World brewing congress 2000 proceedings, Orlando, P-56Google Scholar
  57. Landaud S, Latrille E, Corrieu G (2001) Top pressure and temperature control of the fusel alcohol/ester ratio through yeast growth in beer fermentation. J Inst Brew 10(2):107–117Google Scholar
  58. Li F, Palecek SP (2003) EAP1, a Candida albicans gene involved in binding human epithelial cells. Eukaryotic Cell 2:1266–1273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Linko M, Kronlöf J (1991) Main fermentation with immobilised yeast. Proceedings of the 23rd european brewery convention, Lisbon, pp 353–360Google Scholar
  60. Linko M, Suihko M-L, Kronlöf J, Home S (1993) Use of brewer’s yeast expressing α-acetolactate decarboxylase in conventional and immobilized fermentations. Master Brewers Assoc Americas Tech Quarterly 30:93–97Google Scholar
  61. Linko M, Virkajärvi I, Pohjala N, Lindborg K, Kronlöf J, Pajunen E (1997) Main fermentation with immobilized yeast – a breakthrough? Proceedings of the 26th European brewery convention, Maastricht, pp 385–394Google Scholar
  62. Linko M, Haikara A, Ritala A, Penttilä M (1998) Recent advances in the malting and brewing industry. J Biotechnol 65:85–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Lo WS, Dranginis AM (1998) The cell surface flocculin Flo11 is required for pseudohyphae formation and invasion by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell 9:161–171Google Scholar
  64. Lommi H (1990) Immobilized yeast for maturation and alcohol-free beer. Brewing Distilling Int 5:22–23Google Scholar
  65. Maeba H, Unemoto S, Sato M, Shinotsuka K (2000) Primary fermenation with immobilized yeast in porous chitosan beads. Pilot scale trial. In: Proceedings 26th convention institute brewing Australia and New Zealand Section, Singapore, pp 82–86Google Scholar
  66. Manojlović V, Agouridis N, Kopsahelis N, Kanellaki M, Bugarski B, Nedovic V (2008) Brewing by immobilized freeze dried cells in a novel gas flow bioreactor. Proceedings of the 2008 joint central European congress, 4th central European congress on food, 6th Croatian congress of food technologists, biotechnologists and nutritionists, Cavtat, Croatia, pp 327–334Google Scholar
  67. Masschelein CA, Carlier A, Ramos-Jeunehomme C (1985) The effect of immobilization on yeast physiology and beer quality in continuous and discontinuous systems. Proceedings of the 20th European brewery convention, Helsinki, pp 339–346Google Scholar
  68. Masschelein CA, Ryder DS, Simon J-P (1994) Immobilized cell technology in beer production. Crit Rev Biotechnol 14:155–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Mavituna F (2004) Pre-formed carriers for cell immobilization. In: Nedovic V, Willaert R (eds) Fundamentals of cell immobilization biotechnology. Kluwer Academic Plubishers, The Netherlands, pp 121–139Google Scholar
  70. Meilgaard MC (1975) Flavor chemistry of beer: Part II: flavor threshold of 239 aroma volatiles. MBAA Tech Quarterly 12(3):151–168Google Scholar
  71. Mensour N, Margaritis A, Briens CL, Pilkington H, Russell I (1996) Applications of immobilized yeast cells in the brewing industry. In: Wijffels RH, Buitelaar RM, Bucke C, Tramper J (eds) Immobilized cells: Basics and applications. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 661–671Google Scholar
  72. Mensour N, Margaritis A, Briens CL, Pilkington H, Russell I (1997) New developments in the brewing industry using immobilised yeast cell bioreactor systems. J Inst Brew 103:363–370Google Scholar
  73. Moll M, Durand G, Blachere H (1973). Continuous production of fermented liquids. French Patent 73/23397; US Patent 4009286Google Scholar
  74. Narziss L, Hellich P (1971) Ein Beitrag zur wesentlichen Beschleunigung der Gärung und Reifung des Bieres. Brauwelt 111:1491–1500Google Scholar
  75. Navarro JM, Durand G (1977) Modification of yeast metabolism by immobilization onto porous glass. Eur J Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 4:243–254Google Scholar
  76. Nedovic V, Obradovic B, Vunjak-Novakovic G, Leskosek-Cukalovic I (1993) Kinetics of beer fermentation with immobilized yeast cells in an internal-loop air-lift bioreactor. Chem Ind 47:168–172Google Scholar
  77. Nedovic VA, Pesic R, Leskosek-Cukalovic I, Laketic D, Vunjak-Novakovic G (1997) Analysis of liquid axial dispersion in an internal loop gas-lift bioreactor for beer fermentation with immobilized yeast cells. In: Proceedings 2nd European conference on fluidization, Bilbao, pp 627–635Google Scholar
  78. Nedovic V, Obradovic B, Leskosek-Cukalovic I, Trifunovic O, Pesic R, Bugarski B (2001) Electrostatic generation of alginate microbeads loaded with brewing yeast. Process Biochem 37(1):17–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Nedovic V, Bezbradica D, Obradovic B, Leskosek-Cukalovic I, Bugarski B (2004) Primary beer fermentation by PVA-immobilized brewing yeast in a gas-lift bioreactor. In: World brewing congress 2004 CD Rom proceedings, San Diego, O-63Google Scholar
  80. Nedovic VA, Cukalovic IL, Bezbradica D, Obradovic B, Bugarski B (2005a) New porous matrices and procedures for yeast cell immobilization for primary beer fermentation. In: Proceedings of the 30th European brewery convention, Prague, pp 401–413Google Scholar
  81. Nedovic V, Willaert R, Leskosek-Cukalovic I, Obradovic B, Bugarski B (2005b) Beer production using immobilized cells. In: Nedovic V, Willaert R (eds) Applications of cell immobilization biotechnology. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 259–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Nitzsche F, Höhn G, Meyer-Pittroff R, Berger S, Pommersheim R (2001) A new way for immobilized yeast systems: secondary fermentation without heat treatment. In: Proceedings of the 28th European brewery convention, Budapest, pp 486–494Google Scholar
  83. Obradovic B, Nedovic V, Bugarski B, Willaert RG, Vunjak-Novakovic G (2004). In: Nedovic V, Willaert RG (eds) Focus on biotechnology, volume 8a: Fundamentals of cell immobilization biotechnology, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 411–436Google Scholar
  84. Okabe M, Katoh M, Furugoori F, Yoshida M, Mitsui S (1992) Growth and fermentation characteristics of bottom brewer’s yeast under mechanical stirring. J Ferment Bioeng 73(2):148–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Okabe M, Oda A, Park Y-S, Noguchi K, Okamoto T, Mitsui S (1994) Continuous beer fermentation by high cell-density culture of bottom brewer’s yeast. J Ferment Bioeng 77(1):41–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Onaka T, Nakanishi K, Inoue T, Kubo S (1985) Beer brewing with immobilized yeast. Nat Biotechnol 3:467–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Pajunen E, Grönqvist A (1994) Immobilized yeast fermenters for continuous lager beer maturation. In: Proceedings 23rd convention institute of brew. Australia and New Zealand Section, Sydney, pp 101–103Google Scholar
  88. Pajunen E, Tapani K, Berg H, Ranta B, Bergin J, Lommi H, Viljava T (2001) Controlled beer fermentation with continuous one-stage immobilized yeast reactor. In: Proceedings of the 28th European brewery convention, Budapest, pp 465–476Google Scholar
  89. Peddie HAB (1990) Ester formation in brewery fermentations. J Inst Brew 96:327–331Google Scholar
  90. Petersen EE, Margaritis A, Stewart RJ, Pilkington H, Mensour N (2004) The effects of wort valine concentration on the total diacetyl profile and levels late in batch fermentations with brewing yeast Saccharomyces carlsbergensis. J Am Soc Brew Chem 62(4):131–139Google Scholar
  91. Pilkington H, Maragaritis A, Mensour N, Russell I (1998) Fundamentals of immobilised yeast cell for continuous beer fermentation: a review. J Inst Brew 104:19–31Google Scholar
  92. Pilkington H, Maragaritis A, Mensour N, Sobczak J, Hancock I, Russell I (1999) Kappa-carrageenan gel immobilization of lager brewing yeast. J Inst Brew 105:398–404Google Scholar
  93. Pittner H, Back W, Swinkels W, Meersman E, Van Dieren B, Lomni H (1993) Continuous production of acidified wort for alcohol-free-beer with immobilized lactic acid bacteria. In: Proceedings European brewery convention congress, pp 323–329Google Scholar
  94. Raymond MC, Neufeld RJ, Poncelet D (2004) Encapsulation of brewing yeast in chitosan coated carrageenan microspheres by emulsification/termal gelation. Artif Cells Blood Substit Imobil Biotechnol 32:275–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Reynolds TB, Fink GR (2001) Baker’s yeast, a model for fungal biofilm formation. Science 291:878–881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Ryder DS, Masschelein CA (1985) The growth process of brewing yeast and the biotechnological challenge. J Am Soc Brew Chem 43(2):66–75Google Scholar
  97. Shen H-Y, Moonjai N, Verstrepen KJ, Delvaux FR (2003a) Impact of attachment immobilization on yeast physiology and fermentation performance. J Am Soc Brew Chem 61(2):79–87Google Scholar
  98. Shen H-Y, Moonjai N, Verstrepen KJ, Delvaux F, Delvaux FR (2003b) Immobilization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae induces changes in the gene expression levels of HSP12, SSA3 and ATF1 during beer fermentation. J Am Soc Brew Chem 61(4):175–181Google Scholar
  99. Sheppard DC, Yeaman MR, Welch WH, Phan QT, Fu Y, Ibrahim AS, Filler SG, Zhang M, Waring AJ, Edwards JE Jr (2004) Functional and structural diversity in the Als protein family of Candida albicans. J Biol Chem 279:30480–30489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Shindo S, Sahara H, Koshino S (1993) Relationship of production of succinic acid and methyl citric acid pathway during alcohol fermentation with immobilized yeast. Biotechnol Lett 15(1):51–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Shindo S, Sahara H, Koshino S (1994) Suppression of α-acetolactate formation in brewing with immobilized yeast. J Inst Brew 100:69–72Google Scholar
  102. Smogrovicová D, Dömény Z (1999) Beer volatile by-product formation at different fermentation temperature using immobilized yeasts. Process Biochem 34:785–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Smogrovicová D, Dömény Z, Gemeiner P, Malovíková A, Sturdík E (1997) Reactors for the continuous primary beer fermentation using immobilised yeast. Biotechnol Tech 11:261–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Smogrovicová D, Dömény Navrátil M, Dvorák P (2001) Continuous beer fermentation using polyvinyl alcohol entrapped yeast. In: Proceedings European brewery convention congress, vol 50, pp 1–9Google Scholar
  105. Staab JF, Bradway SD, Fidel PL, Sundstrom P (1999) Adhesive and mammalian transglutaminase substrate properties of Candida albicans Hwp1. Science 283:1535–1583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Stratford M (1989) Yeat flocculation: calcium specificity. Yeast 5:487–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Tata M, Bower P, Bromberg S, Duncombe D, Fehring J, Lau V, Ryder D, Stassi P (1999) Immobilized yeast bioreactor systems for continuous beer fermentation. Biotechnol Progress 15:105–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Teunissen AWRH, Steensma HY (1995) Review: the dominant flocculation genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae constitute a new subtelomeric gene family. Yeast 11:1001–1013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Teunissen AW, Holub E, Van der Hucht J, Van den Berg JA, Steensma HY (1993) Sequence of the open reading frame of the FLO1 gene from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 9:423–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Udenfriend S, Kodukula K (1995) How glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored membrane proteins are made. Ann Rev Biochem 64:563–591Google Scholar
  111. Unemoto S, Mitani Y, Shinotsuka K (1998) Primary fermentation with immobilized yeast in a fluidized bed reactor. Master Brewers Assoc Americas Tech Quarterly 35:58–61Google Scholar
  112. Van De Winkel L, De Vuyst L (1997) Immobilized yeast cell systems in today’s breweries and tomorrow’s. Cerevisia 22(1):27–31Google Scholar
  113. Van De Winkel L, Van Beveren PC, Masschelein CA (1991) The application of an immobilized yeast loop reactor to the continuous production of alcohol-free beer. In: Proceedings European brewery convention congress, pp 307–314Google Scholar
  114. Van De Winkel L, Van Beveren PC, Borremans E, Goossens E, Masschelein CA (1993) High performance immobilized yeast reactor design for continuous beer fermentation. In: Preceedings of the 24th European brewery convention congress, pp 307–314Google Scholar
  115. Van Dieren B (1995) Yeast metabolism and the production of alcohol-free beer. In: EBC symposium immobilized yeast applications in the brewery industry, Monograph XXIV, Espoo, Finland, pp 66–76Google Scholar
  116. Van Iersel MFM, Van Dieren B, Rombouts FM, Abee T (1999) Flavor formation and cell physiology during the production of alcohol-free beer with immobilized Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Enzyme Microb Technol 24(7):407–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Verbelen PJ, De Schutter DP, Delvaux F, Verstrepen KJ, Delvaux FR (2006) Immobilized yeast cell systems for continuous fermentation applications. Biotechnol Lett 28:1515–1525Google Scholar
  118. Verstrepen KJ, Derdelinckx G, Verachtert H, Delvaux FR (2003a) Yeast flocculation: what brewers should know. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 61:197–205Google Scholar
  119. Verstrepen KJ, Derdelinckx G, Dufour J-P, Winderickx J, Thevelein JM, Pretorius IS, Delvaux FR (2003b) Flavor-active esters: Adding fruitiness to beer. J Biosci Bioeng 96(2):110–118Google Scholar
  120. Verstrepen KJ, Reynolds TB, Fink GR (2004) Origins of variation in the fungal cell surface. Nat Rev Microbiol 2:533–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Virkajärvi I (2002) Some developments in immobilized fermentation of beer during the last 30 years. Brauwelt Int 20:100–105Google Scholar
  122. Virkajärvi I, Krönlof J (1998) Long-term stability of immobilized yeast columns in primary fermentation. J Am Soc Brew Chem 56:70–75Google Scholar
  123. Virkajärvi I, Pohjala N (2000) Primary fermentation with immobilized yeast: effects of carrier materials on the flavor of the beer. J Inst Brew 106:311–318Google Scholar
  124. Virkajärvi I, Lindborg K, Kronlöf J, Pajunen E (1999) Effects of aeration on flavor compounds in immobilized primary fermentation. Monatschrift Brauwiss 52(9–12):25–28Google Scholar
  125. Virkajärvi I, Vainikka M, Virtanen H, Home S (2002) Productivity of immobilized yeast reactors with very-high-gravity worts. J Am Soc Brew Chem 60(4):188–197Google Scholar
  126. Viyas VK, Kuchin S, Berkely CD, Carlson M (2003) Snf1 kinases with different b-subunit isoforms play distinct roles in regulating haploid invasive growth. Mol Biol Cell 23:1341–1348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Wackerbauer K, Ludwig A, Möhle J, Legrand J (2003) Measures to improve long term stability of main fermentation with immobilized yeast. In: Proceedings of the 29th European brewery convention, pp 445–457Google Scholar
  128. Wainwright T (1973) Diacetyl – a review. J Inst Brew 79:451–470Google Scholar
  129. White FH, Portno AD (1979) The influence of wort composition on beer ester levels. In: Proceedings European brewery convention congress, pp 447–460Google Scholar
  130. Willaert R (2007) The beer brewing process: wort production and beer fermentation. In: Huie YH (ed) Handbook of food products manufacturing. John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey, pp 443–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Willaert RG, Baron GV (1996) Gel entrapment and micro-encapsulation: methods, applications and engineering principles. Rev Chem Eng 12:5–205Google Scholar
  132. Willaert R, Nedovic VA (2006) Primary beer fermentation by immobilised yeast – a review on flavor formation and control strategies. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 81:1353–1367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Willaert R, Van de Winkel L, De Vuyst L (1999) Improvement of maltose and maltotriose brewery fermentation efficiency using immobilised cell technology. In: Proceedings of the 27th European brewery convention, Cannes, pp 663–671Google Scholar
  134. Yamauchi Y, Okamoto T, Murayama H, Kajino K, Amikura T, Hiratsu H, Nagara A, Kamiya T, Inoue T (1995) Rapid maturation of beer using an immobilized yeast bioreactor. 1. Heat conversion of α-acetolactate. J Biotechnol 38:101–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pieter J. Verbelen
    • 1
  • Viktor A. Nedović
    • 2
    Email author
  • Verica Manojlović
    • 3
  • Freddy R. Delvaux
    • 1
  • Ida Laskošek-Čukalović
    • 2
  • Branko Bugarski
    • 3
  • Ronnie Willaert
    • 4
  1. 1.Centre for Malting and Brewing ScienceHeverleeBelgium
  2. 2.Department of Food Technology and BiochemistryUniversity of BelgradeBelgrade-ZemunSerbia and Montenegro
  3. 3.Department of Chemical EngineeringUniversity of BelgradeBelgradeRepublic of Serbia
  4. 4.Structural Biology BrusselsVrije Universiteit Brussel, Flanders Institute for BiotechnologyBrusselBelgium

Personalised recommendations