Skip to main content

Imaging of Fetal Anomalies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Evidence-Based Imaging in Pediatrics
  • 1511 Accesses

Abstract

■ Routine ultrasound in early pregnancy (before 24 weeks gestation) is useful for gestational age assessment, identification of multiple pregnancies, and identification of unsuspected fetal anomalies (strong evidence).

■ Routine ultrasound in late pregnancy (after 24 weeks gestation) may not be associated with improvements in overall perinatal mortality though there is a lack of data with regard to long-term neurodevelopmental outcome (moderate evidence).

■ High-risk pregnancies benefit from ultrasound assessment including Doppler ultrasound of umbilical and fetal vessels in late pregnancy with a trend in reduction of perinatal deaths (moderate to strong evidence).

■ The accuracy of ultrasound in the evaluation of fetal anomalies is influenced by the skill of the sonographer, quality of equipment, prevalence of a defect, gestational age of the fetus, maternal body habitus, oligohydramnios, and examination protocol (moderate evidence).

■ MRI evaluation of fetal abnormalities is not limited by fetal lie, oligohydramnios, overlying fat, bone, or air (moderate evidence).

■ MRI can be a useful adjunct in the evaluation of certain fetal anomalies particularly within the brain and chest (limited evidence).

■ No data were found in the medical literature that evaluated the cost-effectiveness of US versus MR in the evaluation of fetal anomalies (limited evidence).

■ MRI using higher strength magnets (≥3 T) and Doppler ultrasound in the first trimester should be minimized due to theoretical risks (US moderate evidence, MRI limited evidence).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Morrison I. Semin Perinatol 1985; 9:144.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu S, Joseph KS, Kramer MS et al. JAMA 2002; 287(12): 1561–1567.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hamilton BE, Minino AM, Martin JA et al. 2007; 119(2):345–360.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Waitzman NJ, Romano PS, Scheffler RM. Inquiry 1994; 31:188–205.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Waitzman NJ, Romano PS, Scheffler RM et al. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1995; 44: 694–699.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pryde PG, Isada NB, Hallak M et al. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 80:52–59.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Saari-Kemppainen A, Karjalainen O, Ylostalo P et al. Lancet 1990; 336:387–391.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Beazoglou T, Heffley D, Kyriopoulos J et al. Prenat Diagn 1998; 18:1241–1252.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Vintzileos AM, Ananth CV, Smulian JC et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 182(3):655–660.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ewigman BG, Crane JP, Frigoletto FD et al. N Engl J Med 1993; 329:821–827.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. LeFevre ML, Bain RP, Ewigman BG et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 169:483–489.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Crane JP, LeFevre ML, Winborn RC et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 171:392–399.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Van Dorsten JP, Hulsey TC, Newman RB et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 178(4):742–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Leivo T, Tuominen R, Saari-Kemppainen A et al. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996; 7:309–314.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Neilson JP. Cochrane Database of Systematic Review 1995, Issue 2, Art No: CD000182DOI:10.1002/14651858.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bricker L, Neilson JP. Cochrane Database of Systematic Review 2007, 18(2): nCD001451.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Parer J. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 188;6–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. ACOG Committee Opinion. Number 297. Obstet Gynecol 2004 Aug; 104(2):423–424.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bakketeig LS, Jacobson G, Brodtkorb CJ et al. Lancet 1984; 2:207–211.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Eik-Nes SH, Okland O, Aure JC et al. Lancet 1984:11:347.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bennett MJ, Little GH, Dewhurst J et al. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1988; 89:338–341.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Neilson JP, Munjanja SP, Whitfield Cr. BMJ 1984:289;1179–1182.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Secher NJ, Hansen PK, Lenstrup C et al. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1987; 94:105–109.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Waldenstrom U, Nilsson S, Fall O et al. Lancet 1988:2;585–588.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ewigman B, LeFebre M, Hesser J. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 76:189–194.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bucher H, Schmidt JG. BMJ 1993 Jul 3; 307(6895):13–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Thomas DF. Prenat Diagn 2001; 21:1001–1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Harman C, Baschet A. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2003; 15:147.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Detti L, Akiyama M, Mari G. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2002; 14:587.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Fleischer A, Schumlman H, Farmakides G. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986; 154:806.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Thompson RS, Trudinger BJ. Ultrasound Med Biol 1990; 16:449.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Neilson JP, Alfirevic Z. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000; (2):CD000073.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Westergaard HB, Langhoff-Roos J, Lingman G et al. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 17:46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wladimiroff JW, Wijingaard JAGW, Degani S. Obstet Gynecol 1987; 69:705.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wienerroither H, Steiner H, Tomaselli J et al. Obstet Gynecol 2001 97:449.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kurschera J, Tomaselli J, Urlesberger B et al. Early Human Development 2002; 29:47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Quinn T, Hubbard A, Adzick NS. J Pediatr Surg 1998; 33:553–558.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Breysem L, Bosmans H, Dymarkowski S et al. Eur Radiol 2003; 13:1538–1548.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Frates MC, Kumar AJ, Benson CB et al. Radiology 2004; 232:398–404.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Levine D, Barnes PD, Madsen JR et al. Radiology 1997; 204:635–642.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Poatamo J, Vanninen R, Partanen K et al. Ultrasound Obstet Genocol 1999; 13(5):327–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Malinger G, Ben Sira L, Lev D et al. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 23:333–340.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Whitby E, Paley Davie, MN, Spigg A et al. Br J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 106:519–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Glenn O, Goldstein R, Li K et al. J Ultrasound Med 2005; 24:791–804.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Patel TR, Bannister CM, Thome J. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2003 Dec ;13(Suppl 1):S18–S22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Benacerraf B, Shipp TD, Bromle B et al. J Ultrasound Med 2007; 26:1513–1522.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Matsuoka S, Takeuchi K, Yamanaka Y et al. Fetal Diagn Ther 2003; 18:447–453.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Poutamo J, Vanninen R, Partanen K et al. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2000; 79:65–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Cassart M, Massez A, Metens T et al. Am J Roentgenol 2004; 182:689–695.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Kremkau WF. In Laurence JH, Tobias CA (eds.). Advances in Biology and Physics, Vol. 3:191. New York: Academic Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Stark C, Orleans M, Haverkamp AD et al. Obstetr Gynecol 1984; 63:194–200.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Lyons EA, Dyke C, Toms M et al. Radiology 1988; 166:687–690.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Bly S, VandenHof MC et al. J Obstet Gynecol Can 2005; 7(6):572–580.

    Google Scholar 

  54. AIUM official statements. AIUM reporter November 1993, p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Newnham JP, Doherty DA, Kendall GE, et al. Lancet 2004 Dec 4–10; 364(9450):2038–2044.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Salveen KA, Vakketig LS, EikNes SH et al. Lancet 1992:339;85–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Sulvesen K, Eik-Nes SH. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999 13:241–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Kieler H, Knattingius S, Haglund B et al. Epidemiology 2001:12:618–621.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Duck FA, Martin K. Phys Med Biol 1991; 36:1423–1432.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Henderson J Whittingham TA, Dunn T. BMUS Bulletin Nov 1997:10–14.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Hand JW, Li Y, Thomas EL et al. Magn Reson Med 2006; 55:883–893.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Shellock FG, Kanal E. JMRI 1991; 1:97–101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Yip YP, Capriotti C, Tlagala SL et al. J Magn Reson Imaging 1994; 4:742–748.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Yip YP, Capriotti C, Yip JW. J Magn Reson Imaging 1995; 5:457–462.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Mevissen M, Buntenkotter S, Loscher W. Teratology 1994; 50:229–237.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Magin RL, Lee JK, Klintsova A et al. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 12:140–149.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Myers C, Duncan KR, Gowland PA et al. Br J Radiol 1998; 71:549–551.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Glover P, J Hykin, Gowland PA et al. Br J Radiol 1995; 68:1090–1094.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Baker P, Johnson I, Harvey R et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 170:32–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Clements H, Duncan KR, Fielding K et al. Br J Radiol 2000; 73:190–194

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Kok RD, de Vries MM, Heerschap A et al. Magn Reson Imaging 2004; 22:851–854.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. De Wilde JP, Rivers AW, Price DU et al. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 2005; 87:335–353.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Kanal E, Borgstede JP, Barkovich AJ et al. Am J Roentgenol 2002; 178:1335–1347.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Lys S, DeWals P, Grimee P et al. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1989 30:101–109.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Li TM, Greenes RA, Weisbjurg M et al. Med Decis Making 1988 8 48–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Levi S, Crouzeere P Schapps FP et al. US screening for fetal malformations Lancet 1989; 1:679.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Shirley IM, Bottomley F, Robindson VP. Br J Radiol 1992; 65:564–569.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Chitty LS Hung AGGH, Moore J et al. BMJ 1992; 303:1165–1169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Levi S, Montenagro N. Ann NY Acad Sci 1998; 847:103–117.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Sabbagha RE Sheikh Z, Tamura RK. AM J OBstet Gynecol 1985; 152:822–827.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Crane JP Lefevre ML, Winborn RC et al. AM J Obsete gyncol 1994:171;392–399.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Garne E, Loane M, Dolk H et al. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005 Jan ; 25(1):6–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Tilea B, Delezoide A, Khung-Savatovski S et al. US OB Gyn 2007; 29:651–659.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Van Dorsten JP, Hulsey TC, Newman RB, Menard MK. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998 Apr ; 178(4):742–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Kaiser L et al. Prenatal Diagn 2000; 20:970–975.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Azoulay R, Fallet Bianco C, Garel C et al. Pedatr Radiol 2006 36:97–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Simon EM, Goldstein RB. Am J Neuroradiol. 2000; 21:1688–1698.

    Google Scholar 

  88. de Laveaucoupet J, Audibert F, Guis F et al. Prenat Diagn 2001; 21:729–736.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Whitby EH, Paley MNJ, Sprigg A et al. BJOG 2004; 111:784–792.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Kirkinen P, Partnaen K, Merikanto J et al. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologic Scandinavia 1997; 76:917–922.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Glenn OA, Barkovich J. Am J Neuroradiol 2006; 27:1807–1814.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Levine D, Trop I, Mehta TS, Barnes PD. Radiology 2002; 223:652–660.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Leitner Y, Goez H, Gull I et al. J Child Neurol 2004:19:435–438.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Patel TR, Bannister CM, Thorne J. Eur J Pedatir Surg 2003; 13(Suppl 1):S18–S22.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Chong BW, Babcook CJ, Pang D et al. Neurosurgery 1997; 41:924–928.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Coakley FV, Hricak H, Filly RA et al. Radiology 1999; 213:691–696.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Ouahba J, Luton D, Vuillard E et al. BJOG 2006; 113:1072–1079.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Triulzi F, Parazzini C, Righini A. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2005; 10:411–420.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Blaicher W, Bernaschek G, Deutinger J et al. J Perinat Med 2004;3253–3257.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Seibert JR. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2006; 76:674–684.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. Bekker MN, van Vugt JMG. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2001; 96:173–178.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Ghai S, Fong KW, Toi A et al. RadioGraphics 2006 26:389–405.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Girard N, Chaumoitre K, Confort-Gouny S et al. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2006; 18:164–176.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Garel C. Pediatr Radiol 2004; 34:694–699.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Valsky DV, Ben-Sira L, Porat S et al. J Ultrasound Med 2004; 23:519–523.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Hedrick HL, Flake AW, Crombleholme TM et al. J Pediatr Surg 2004 Mar ; 39(3):430–438.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. ACR Practice Guideline for the Performance of MRI of the Soft Tissue Components of the Pelvis. Reston, VA: ACR Amended 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  108. Levine D, Barnes PD, Robertson RR et al. Radiology 2003; 229:51–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Kline-Fath BM, Calvo-Garcia MA, O’Hara SM et al. Pediatr Radiol 2007 Jan ; 37(1):47–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Weiss JL, Cleary-Goldman J, Tanji K et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004 Feb ; 190(2):563–565.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Hu LS,Caire J, Twickler DH et al. Pediatr Radiol 2006 Jan ; 36(1):76–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Mota R, Ramalho C, Monteiro J et al. Fetal Diagn Ther 2007; 22(2):107–111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Bouvenot GG, Mourot MG, Sonigo P et al. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005; 26(7):738–744.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dorothy I. Bulas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bulas, D.I. (2010). Imaging of Fetal Anomalies. In: Medina, L., Applegate, K., Blackmore, C. (eds) Evidence-Based Imaging in Pediatrics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0922-0_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0922-0_41

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-0921-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-0922-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics