Advertisement

Whatever Happened to Pedagogical Theory?

  • David R. Olson
Part of the Literacy Studies book series (LITS, volume 2)

Abstract

This chapter makes the controvertial claim that the skills that distinguish readers from non-readers provide an unreliable guide as to what should be taught. Furthermore, such research has inadvertently encouraged an extremely teacher centered pedagogy in many Western countries especially the United States and Britain. It traces this development to Thorndike’s behavioristic assumptions about teaching and learning. A more general theory of pedagogy makes a sharp distinction between teaching and learning and explores the options available to educators as they attempt to reconcile the agency of the learner, that is, what the learner is trying to do and willing to do, with the goals and standards of the teacher, that is, what the teacher hopes to help the learners achieve. It is argued that through the negotiation of shared goals and standards learners can come to take some responsibility for their own learning. The teacher’s responsibility is to help them do so.

Keywords

Contingent Knowledge Pedagogical Theory Contingent Truth Empirical Truth Deductive Relation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Barzun, J. (1945). Teacher in America. Indianapolis: Liberty Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.Google Scholar
  3. Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.Google Scholar
  4. Chartier, A. M., & Hebrard, J. (2001). Literacy and schooling from the cultural historian’s point of view. In T. S. Popkewitz, B. M. Franklin & M. Pereyra (Eds.), Cultural history and education: critical essays of knowledge and schooling (pp. 263–288). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Cremin, L. A. (1961). The transformation of the school: progressivism in American education 1876–1957. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  6. Dewey, J. (1976). The child and the curriculum. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: the middle works, volume 2: 1902–1903 (pp. 271–291). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Dunkel, H. B. (1970). Herbart and Herbartianism: an educational ghost story. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. Gage, N., & Berliner, D. (1975). Educational psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  9. Hirst, P. H. (1973). What is teaching? In R. S. Peters (Ed.), The philosophy of education (pp. 163–177). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Lagemann, E. C. (2000). An elusive science: the troubling history of educational research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. Kant, I. (1966). Critique of pure reason (F. Max Muller, trans.). Garden City, NJ: Anchor Books. Originally published in 1881.Google Scholar
  12. Kruger, A., & Tomasello, M. (1996). Cultural learning and learning culture. In D. Olson (Ed.), Handbook of education and human development: new models of teaching, learning, and schooling (pp. 169–187). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  13. Olson, D. R. (2003). Psychological theory and educational reform: how school remakes mind and society. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Olson, D. R. (2007). Jerome Bruner. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  15. Premack, D., & Premack, A. J. (1996). Why animals lack pedagogy and some cultures have more of it than others. In D. R. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), The handbook of education and human development (pp. 302–323). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  16. Ravitch, D. (1985). The schools we deserve: reflections on the educational crises of our times. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  17. Shulman, L. (Ed.) (1990) Research in teaching and learning: a project of American educational research association. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  18. Stace, W. T. (1920). (Ed.) A critical history of Greek philosophy. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  19. Thorndike, E. L. (1913). Educational psychology: volume II: the psychology of learning. New York: Teachers College Columbia University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering toward utopic: a century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations