Early Identification and Intervention to Prevent Reading Difficulties

Chapter
Part of the Literacy Studies book series (LITS, volume 2)

Abstract

This study presents a longitudinal examination of the development of reading and reading-related skills of native English (L1) and non-native English speakers. Reading and related cognitive abilities were examined in children kindergarten and in Grade 5. The analyses were conducted to investigate the influence of the balanced literacy program that was implemented in kindergarten and Grade 1 for the English as a Second Language (ESL) and L1 students in Grade 5. Another aim of the study was to investigate the reading patterns of ESL children in kindergarten and in grade 5 compared to those of their native English-speaking classmates from kindergarten to Grade 5. Finally, we examined how children at risk for reading disabilities (RD) could be identified.

The findings provided support for a model of early identification and intervention for all children at risk for reading failure. Furthermore, the results showed that learning English as a second language is not an impediment to successful decoding. In addition, there is a constant need to assess the reading skills of students in the classroom over the elementary years in order to detect difficulties that may emerge when the reading demands change over the years, and different reading strategies are required. Finally, the results demonstrate the heterogeneity of the RD group and call for further longitudinal examination of different RD subgroups.

Keywords

Depression 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by grants from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and the Canadian Language and Literacy Research Network to Linda S. Siegel. The authors wish to thank the students, principals, teachers, parents, and administrators in the North Vancouver school district for their invaluable contributions and support.

References

  1. Baddeley, A. D. (1983). Working memory. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 302, 311–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barwick, M., & Siegel, L. S. (1996). Learning difficulties in adolescent clients of a shelter for runaway and homeless street youth. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 6, 649–670.Google Scholar
  3. Beitchman, J. H., Wilson, B., Douglas, L., Young, A., & Adlaf, E. (2001). Substance use disorders in young adults with and without LD: predictive and concurrent relationships. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 317–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bennett, L., & Ottley, P. (2000). Launch into reading success through phonological awareness training. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
  5. Boetsch, E. A., Green, P. A., & Pennington, B. F. (1996). Psychosocial correlates of dyslexia across the life span. Development and Psychopathology, 8, 536–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Calfee, R., Lindamood, C., & Lindamood, P. (1973). Acoustic–phonetic skills and reading-kindergarten through twelfth grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 64, 293–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Da Fontoura, H. A., & Siegel, L. S. (1995). Reading, syntactic and working memory skills of bilingual Portuguese–English Canadian children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 7, 139–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. D’Angiulli, A., & Siegel, L. S. (2004). Early literacy instruction, SES, and reading development in English language learners and children with English as a first language. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 19, 202–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. D’Angiulli, A., Siegel, L. S., & Maggi, S. (2005). Literacy instruction, SES, and word-reading achievement in English-language learners and children with English as a first language: a longitudinal study. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 19, 202–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Denckla, M., & Rudel, R. G. (1976). Rapid “automatized” naming (R.A.N.): dyslexia differentiated from other learning disabilities. Neuropsychologia, 14, 471–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Durgunoglu, A. Y., Nagy, W. E., & Hancin-Bhatt, B. J. (1993). Cross-language transfer of phonological awareness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 453–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fletcher, J. M., Francis, D. J., Shaywitz, S. E., Lyon, G. R., Foorman, B. R., Stuebing, K. K., et al. (1998). Intelligent testing and the discrepancy model for children with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 13, 186–203.Google Scholar
  14. Gholamain, M., & Geva, E. (1999). Orthographic and cognitive factors in the concurrent development of basic reading skills in English and Persian. Language Learning, 49, 183–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gilbertson, M., & Bramlett, R. K. (1998). Phonological awareness screening to identify at risk readers: implications for practitioners. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 29, 109–116.Google Scholar
  16. Goldman, R., Fristoe, M., & Woodcock, R. (1974). Goldman–Fristoe–Woodcock Auditory Skills Test Battery. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
  17. Gottardo, A., Stanovich, K. E., & Siegel, L. S. (1996). The relationship between phonological sensitivity, syntactic processing, and verbal working memory in reading performance of third grade children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 63, 563–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gregg, N., Hoy, C., King, M., Moreland, C., & Jagota, M. (1992). The MMPI-2 profiles of adults with learning disabilities in university and rehabilitation settings. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 386–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Joanisse, M. F., Manis, F. R., Keating, P., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2000). Language deficits in dyslexic children: speech perception, phonology, and morphology. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77, 30–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Karlsen, B., & Gardner, E. (1994). Stanford diagnostic test. San Francisco: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
  21. Lesaux, N. K., & Siegel, L. S. (2003). The development of reading in children who speak English as a second language. Developmental Psychology, 39, 1005–1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lichtenstein, S., & Zantol-Wiener, K. (1988). Special education dropouts (ERIC Digest No. 451). Reston, VA: ERIC Clearinghouse on Handicapped and Gifted Children. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 295 395).Google Scholar
  23. Lovett, M. W., Steinbach, K. A., & Frijters, J. C. (2000). Remediating the core deficits of developmental reading disability: a double-deficit perspective. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 334–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McBride, H., & Siegel, L. S. (1997). Learning disabilities and adolescent suicide. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 652–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McCardle, P., Mele-McCarthy, J., & Leos, K. (2005). English language learners and learning disabilities: research agenda and implications for practice. Learning Disability Research &Practice, 20, 68–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McLeskey, J., & Grizzle, K. L. (1992). Grade retention rates among students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 58, 548–554.Google Scholar
  27. Muter, V., Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. (1997). The phonological abilities test. London: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  28. North Vancouver School District No. 44. (2001). Firm foundations: early literacy teaching and training. North Vancouver, BC, Canada: Author.Google Scholar
  29. Sabornie, E. J. (1994). Social-affective characteristics in early adolescents identified as learning disabled and nondisabled. Learning Disability Quarterly, 17, 268–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Siegel, L. S. (1993). The development of reading. In H. W. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 24, pp. 63–97). San Diego, CA: Academic.Google Scholar
  31. Siegel, L. S. (1994). Phonological processing deficits as the basis of dyslexia: implications for remediation. In M. J. Riddoch & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.), Cognitive neuropsychology and cognitive rehabilitation (pp. 379–400). Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  32. Siegel, L. S., & Ryan, E. B. (1988). Development of grammatical-sensitivity, phonological and short-term memory skills in normally achieving and subtypes of learning disabled children. Developmental Psychology, 24, 28–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Siegel, L. S., & Ryan, E. B. (1989). The development of working memory in normally achieving and subtypes of learning disabled children. Child Development, 60, 973–980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Snow, C., Burns, M., & Griffin, P. (eds). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  35. Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stanovich, K. E. (1999). The sociopsychometrics of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 350–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Statistics Canada. (2001). 2001 census. Ottawa, ON, Canada: Author.Google Scholar
  38. Thorndike, R. L., Hagen, R. P., & Sattler, J. M. (1986). Technical manual: Stanford Binet Intelligence Scale (4th ed.). Chicago: Riverside.Google Scholar
  39. Verhoeven, L. (1990). Acquisition of reading in a second language. Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 90–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Waltzman, D., & Cairns, H. (2000). Grammatical knowledge of third grade good and poor readers. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 263–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wilkinson, G. S. (1993). The wide range achievement test-3. Wilmington, DE: Jastak Associates.Google Scholar
  42. Willows, D. M., & Ryan, E. B. (1981). Differential utilization of syntactic and semantic information by skilled and less skilled readers in the intermediate grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 607–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Woodcock, R. (1987). Woodcock reading mastery tests – revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
  44. Woodcock, R., & Johnson, M. B. (1989). Woodcock-Johnson psycho-educational battery-revised. Itasca IL: Riverside Publishing.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations