Rudiments of Inflectional Morphology Skills in Emergent English–Hebrew Biliterates

Part of the Literacy Studies book series (LITS, volume 2)


The present study investigated the development of inflectional morphological skills in primary school children learning Hebrew as a foreign language. Participants were grade 1 and 2 children whose home language is English, attending a bilingual English-Hebrew day school in Canada. Side by side with a growing repertoire of Hebrew vocabulary, grammatical skills and sentence comprehension, rudiments of various inflectional skills are already part of the linguistic skills of primary school children who have had one to two years of exposure to Hebrew in the classroom. Hebrew as L2 children who had better syntactic skills were more successful on more analytic morphological inflection tasks as well. Familiarity with specific lexical items was more important for the successful inflections of specific words than general vocabulary knowledge. On the whole, just like monolingual children, Hebrew as L2 children who have better developed vocabulary and morphological skills are better able to comprehend sentences, and vice versa.


Phonological Awareness Language Proficiency Oral Language Morphological Awareness Primary School Child 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



We wish to thank the staff and children at Associated Hebrew Day School (Neptune Branch) in Toronto for their support and patience. We are also grateful to the University of Toronto for enabling access to undergraduate interns.


  1. Aitchinson, J. (2003). Review of language change: progress or decay? Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 22, 132–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anglin, J. M. (1993). Vocabulary development: a morphological analysis. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 58, v–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aram, D. (2005). Continuity in children’s literacy achievements: a longitudinal perspective from kindergarten to school. First Language, 25, 259–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ben-Dror, I., Bentin, S., & Frost, R. (1995). Semantic, phonologic, and morphologic skills in reading disabled and normal children: evidence from perception and production of spoken Hebrew. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 876–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bindman, M. (2004). Grammatical awareness across languages and the role of social context: evidence from English and Hebrew. In T. Nunes & P. Bryant (Eds.), Handbook of children’s literacy. Great Britain: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  6. Carlisle, J. F. (2000). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: impact on reading. Reading and Writing, 12, 169–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carlisle, J. F. (2003). Morphology matters in learning to read: a commentary. Reading Psychology, 24, 291–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deacon, S. H., & Kirby, J. R. (2004). Morphological awareness: just “more phonological?” The roles of morphological and phonological awareness in reading development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 223–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deacon, S. H., Wade-Woolley, L., & Kirby, J. (2006). Crossover: the role of morphological awareness in French Immersion children’s reading. Developmental Psychology, 43, 723–746.Google Scholar
  10. Elbro, C., & Arnbak, E. (1996). The role of morpheme recognition and morphological awareness in dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 46, 209–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fowler, A. E., & Liberman, I. Y. (1995). The role of phonology and orthography in morphological awareness. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing. England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  12. Geva, E., & Siegel, L. S. (2000). Orthographic and cognitive factors in the concurrent development of basic reading skills in two languages. Reading and Writing, 12, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Geva, E., Wade-Woolley, L., & Shany, M. (1997). Development of reading efficiency in first and second language. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 119–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gillis, S., & Ravid, D. (2006). Typological effects on spelling development: a crosslinguistic study of Hebrew and Dutch. Journal of Child Language, 33, 621–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kahn-Horwitz, J., Shimron, J., & Sparks, R. L. (2005). Predicting foreign language reading achievement in elementary school students. Reading and Writing, 18, 527–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ku, Y., & Anderson, R. C. (2003). Development of morphological awareness in Chinese and English. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16, 399–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Levin, I., Ravid, D., & Rapaport, S. (1999). Developing morphological awareness and learning to write: a two-way street. In T. Nunes (Ed.), Integrating literacy, research and practice. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  18. Mahony, D., Singson, M., & Mann, V. (2000). Reading ability and sensitivity to morphological relations. Reading and Writing, 12, 191–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McCarthy, J. (1981). A prosodic theory of non-concatenative morphology. Linguistic Inquiry, 12, 373–418.Google Scholar
  20. Muter, V., Hulme, C., Snowling, M. J., & Stevenson, J. (2004). Phonemes, rimes, vocabulary, and grammatical skills as foundations of early reading development: evidence from a longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 40, 665–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Naglieri, J. (1985). Matrix analogies test. New York: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  22. Nagy, W., Berninger, V., & Abbot, R. (2006). Contributions of morphology beyond phonology to literacy outcomes of upper elementary and middle school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 134–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ravid, D. (1995). Language change in child and adult Hebrew: a psycholinguistic perspective. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Ravid, D. (2001). Learning to spell in Hebrew: phonological and morphological factors. Reading and Writing, 14, 459–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ravid, D., & Bar-On, A. (2005). Manipulating written Hebrew roots across development: the interface of semantic, phonological and orthographic factors. Reading and Writing, 18, 231–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ravid, D., Levie, R., & Ben-Zvi, G. A. (2003). The role of language typology in linguistic development: implications for the study of language disorders. In Y. Levy & J. Schaeffer (Eds.), Language competence across populations: toward a definition of specific language impairment (pp. 171–196). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  27. Ravid, D., & Malenky, D. (2001). Awareness of linear and nonlinear morphology in Hebrew: a developmental study. First Language, 21, 25–56.Google Scholar
  28. Ravid, D., & Schiff, R. (2004). Learning to represent vowels in written Hebrew: different factors across development. First Language, 24, 185–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Geva, E. (2007). Morphological awareness, phonological awareness, and reading in English–Arabic bilingual children. Reading and Writing, Published online: June 30, 2007.Google Scholar
  30. Schiff, R., & Calif, S. (2007). Role of phonological and morphological awareness in L2 oral word reading. Language Learning, 57, 271–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schwartz, M., Geva, E., Share, D. L., & Leikin, M. (2007). Learning to read in English as third language: the cross-linguistic transfer of phonological processing skills. Written Language & Literacy, 10, 25–52.Google Scholar
  32. Shatil, E. (1997). Predicting reading ability: evidence for cognitive modularity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Haifa.Google Scholar
  33. Shimron, J. (2006). Reading Hebrew: the language and psychology of reading it. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  34. Singson, M., Mahony, D., & Mann, V. (2000). The relation between reading ability and morphological skills: evidence from derivation suffixes. Reading and Writing, 12, 219–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Solberg, S., & Nevo, B. (1979). Preliminary steps towards an Israeli standardization of the Peabody Test. Megamoth, 3, 407–413. [Hebrew].Google Scholar
  36. Verhoven, L., & Perfetti, C. (2003). Introduction to this special issue: the role of morphology in learning to read. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7, 209–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wang, M., Chen, C., & Chen, S. (2006). Contribution of morphological awareness to Chinese-English biliteracy acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 542–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations