Advertisement

Becoming Literate in a Foreign Language

  • Liliana Tolchinsky
Chapter
Part of the Literacy Studies book series (LITS, volume 2)

Abstract

Mastering the language(s) of a literate community implies learning its written and spoken modalities and second-language learners must cope with the two modalities simultaneously. The study explores Chinese and Moroccan 5 to 8 years-old awareness to morphological processes and the relationship that they establish between the spoken and the written representation of these processes. Children were at their initial stages of learning Catalan, a language and a orthographic system that differ typologically from their own. Moreover, Chinese and Moroccan children earlier experience with spoken and written language differs to a large extent form the one under way. Our findings show that there is a subtle influence of learners’ first-languages in their mastery of critical aspects of nominal morphology of the target language. However, there are some critical matters that seem to reappear in all studied groups, irrespective of their first-languages. As for their conceptualization of the speech-writing relationship, many children were still unaware of the basic representational feature of alphabetic writing; namely, that whenever a spoken utterance gets a written representation, the changes this utterance suffers should be reflected in its written representation.

The domain of literacy has undergone a turning point over the last two decades. From being considered as a school matter, an object of instruction, literacy has become a domain of knowledge that is worth studying from a developmental point of view. The work of Iris Levin made a notable contribution in this sense. Her studies are an obligatory reference in the study of early literacy throughout the world, and they inaugurated the developmental approach to literacy in Hebrew.

Keywords

Chinese Child Initial Picture Target Picture Locative Derivative Standard Modern Arabic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The study reported in the chapter was partially supported by an I+D grant from the Spanish Ministry of Education BSO2003-06020.

References

  1. Auzias, M., Casati, I., Cellier, C., Delaye, R., & Verleure, F. (1977). Écrire à cinq ans?. Paris: Press Universitaire de France. [Writing at five?].Google Scholar
  2. Byalistock, E. (2002). Acquisition of literacy in bilingual children: a framework for research. Language Learning, 52(1), 159–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bialystok, E., Luk, G., & Kwan, E. (2005). Bilingualism, biliteracy, and learning to read: interactions among languages and writing systems. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9, 43–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chomsky, C. (1971). Write first, read later. Childhood Education, 47(6), 296–299.Google Scholar
  5. Clay, M. (1975). What did I write? Beginning writing behaviour. NH: Heinemann Educational Books.Google Scholar
  6. Dressler, W. U. (2004). Degrees of grammatical productivity in inflectional morphology. Italian Journal of Linguistics, 15, 31–62.Google Scholar
  7. Dressler, W. U. (2007). Introduction. In S. Laaha & S. Gillis (Eds.) Typological perspectives on the acquisition of noun and verb morphology. Antwerp Papers in Linguistics, 112Google Scholar
  8. Feitelson, D. (1988). Facts and fads in beginning reading a cross-language perspective. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  9. Ferreiro, E. (1988). L’écriture avant la lettre. In H. Sinclair (Ed.), La production de notations chez le jeune enfant: langage, nombre, rythmes et melodies (pp. 17–70). Paris: Press Universitaire de France. [The production of notations in young children: language, number, rhytms, and melodies].Google Scholar
  10. Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words: language, life and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Henderson, E., & Beers, J. (eds). (1980). Developmental and cognitive aspects of learning to spell. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
  12. Levin, I., & Tolchinsky- Landsmann, L. (1990). Becoming literate: referential and phonetic strategies in early reading and writing. European Journal of Behavioural Development, 12, 369–384.Google Scholar
  13. Liceras, J. M. (1997). La evolución del concepto de parámetro en la teoría lingüística y las consecuencias para la gramática comparada. In P. En Fernández Nistal & J. M. Bravo (Eds.), Aproximaciones a los estudios de traducción (pp. 71–113). Valladolid: SAE, University of Valladolid. [The evolution of the concept of parameter in linguist theory and its consequences for descriptive grammar. In Fernández Nistal, P. & Bravo, J.M. (eds.) Approximations to the study of Translation].Google Scholar
  14. Luria, A. R. (1978). The development of Writing in the child. In M. Cole (Ed.), The selected writings of A. R. Luria (pp. 146–194). New York: M.E. Sharpe Inc.. (Original work published 1929).Google Scholar
  15. Olson, D. (1994). The World on Paper. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  16. Purdue, C. (1993). Adult language acquisition. Crosslinguistic perspectives (2 volumes). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Ravid, D. (2004). Derivational morphology revisited: later lexical development in Hebrew. In R. Berman (Ed.), Language development across childhood and adolescence (pp. 53–81). TILAR Amsterdam: John Benjamin.Google Scholar
  18. Read, Ch. (1971). Pre-school children’s knowledge of English phonology. Harvard Educational Review, 41, 1–34.Google Scholar
  19. Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. B. K. (1981). Narrative, literacy and face in interethnic communication. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  20. Smith, N., & Tsimpli, I. M. (1995). The mind of a savant: language learning and modularity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  21. Teale, W., & Sulzby, E. (eds). (1986). Emergent literacy: writing and reading. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  22. Tolchinsky-Landsmann, L., & Levin, I. (1985). Writing in preschoolers: an age related analysis. Applied Psycholinguistics, 6, 319–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tolchinsky-Landsman, L., & Levin, I. (1987). Writing in four to six years old: representation of semantic and phonetic similarities and differences. Journal of Child Language, 14, 127–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tolchinsky, L., Salas, N., & Perera, J. (2007). Spoken and written representation of number in L2 Catalan indefinite DPs. Catalan Review, XXI, 321–350.Google Scholar
  25. Tolchinsky, L., & Salas, N. (2009). Written representations of nominal morphology by Chinese and Moroccan children learning a Romance language. In Ch. Bazerman, R. Krut, K. Lunsford, S. McLeod, S. Null, P. Rogers and A. Stansell (Eds.), Traditions of Writing Research. New York and London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  26. Tsimpli, I.M. & Roussou, A. (1991). Parameter-resetting in L2? In UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 3, 149–169Google Scholar
  27. Verhoeven, L. (2005). Literacy development across language boundaries. In D. Ravid & H. Baat Zeev Shydkrot (Eds.), Perspectives on language and language development (pp. 437–452). Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations