Abstract
Vocabulary learning is central to reading ability and academic achievement. Vocabulary researchers and educators have viewed its essence as a process of associating the pronunciations and meanings of words in memory, and they have neglected the contribution that spellings might make to vocabulary learning. We review theory and evidence that shows this to be a serious oversight. Once children become literate, they retain the spellings of words bonded to their pronunciations and meanings in memory. Several studies show that spellings of words are retained in memory and influence phonemic and syllabic segmentation of words. They enhance memory for pseudowords, and they impact the detection of oral rhyming words. Two studies show that exposing second and fifth graders to the spellings of new vocabulary words enhances their memory for pronunciations and meanings of the words. Students with better developed orthographic knowledge benefit more from spellings in learning vocabulary words than students with weaker knowledge. In fact, the detection of a Matthew effect suggests that differences in orthographic knowledge create a difference in vocabulary size that grows increasingly large over time. These findings carry implications for enhancing vocabulary learning and instruction. Teachers need to show the spellings of new vocabulary words when they discuss their meanings. Students need to stop and pronounce unfamiliar words rather than skip them during independent reading. Researchers need to incorporate orthography into their theories explaining vocabulary acquisition, specifically, phonological working memory theories, and they need to attend to its influence in the studies they conduct.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Beck, I., & McKeown, M. (2002). Bringing words to life: robust vocabulary instruction. New York: Guilford.
Blachowicz, C., & Fisher, P. (2004). Vocabulary lessons. Educational Leadership, 61, 66–69.
Chall, J., Jacobs, V., & Baldwin, L. (1990). The reading crisis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cutting, L., & Scarborough, H. (2006). Prediction of reading comprehension: relative contributions of word recognition, language proficiency, and other cognitive skills can depend on how comprehension is measured. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 277–299.
Ehri, L. (1980). The development of orthographic images. In U. Frith (Ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling (pp. 311–338). London, UK: Academic.
Ehri, L. (1984). How orthography alters spoken language competencies in children learning to read and spell. In J. Downing & R. Valtin (Eds.), Language awareness and learning to read (pp. 119–147). New York: Springer.
Ehri, L. (1992). Reconceptualizing the development of sight word reading and its relationship to recoding. In P. Gough, L. Ehri & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 107–143). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ehri, L. (1998). Grapheme-phoneme knowledge is essential for learning to read words in English. In J. Metsala & L. Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 3–40). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ehri, L. (2005). Development of sight word reading: phases and findings. In M. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading, a handbook (pp. 135–154). UK: Blackwell.
Ehri, L., Nunes, S., Stahl, S., & Willows, D. (2001). Systematic phonics instruction helps students learn to read: evidence from the National Reading Panel’s meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71, 393–447.
Ehri, L., & Wilce, L. (1979). The mnemonic value of orthography among beginning readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 26–40.
Ehri, L., & Wilce, L. (1980). The influence of orthography on readers’ conceptualization of the phonemic structure of words. Applied Psycholinguistics, 1, 371–385.
Ehri, L., & Wilce, L. (1986). The influence of spellings on speech: are alveolar flaps /d/ or /t/? In D. Yaden & S. Templeton (Eds.), Metalinguistic awareness and beginning literacy (pp. 101–114). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Gathercole, S. E. (2006). Nonword repetition and word learning: the nature of the relationship. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 513–543.
Gathercole, S., & Baddeley, A. (1989). Evaluation of the role of phonological STM in the development of vocabulary in children: a longitudinal study. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 200–213.
Hatch, E., & Brown, C. (1995). Vocabulary, semantics, and language education. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Nagy, W., & Scott, J. (2000). Vocabulary processes. In M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research: Volume III (pp. 269–284). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Reitsma, P. (1983). Printed word learning in beginning readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 75, 321–339.
Rosenthal, J., & Ehri, L. (2008). The mnemonic value of orthography for vocabulary learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 175–191.
Sadoski, M. (2005). A dual coding view of vocabulary learning. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 21, 221–238.
Seidenberg, M., & Tanenhaus, M. (1979). Orthographic effects on rhyme monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 546–554.
Share, D. (2004). Orthographic learning at a glance: on the time course and developmental onset of self-teaching. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 87, 267–298.
Sparks, R., & Artzer, M. (1997). Prediction of foreign language proficiency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 549–562.
Stanovich, K. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407.
Stuart, M., & Coltheart, M. (1988). Does reading develop in a sequence of stages? Cognition, 30, 139–181.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Additional information
This article is reprinted with minor adaptations from the article by L. Ehri and J. Rosenthal, (2007), “Viewpoints: Spellings of words: A neglected facilitator of vocabulary learning” that appeared in Journal of Literacy Research, 39(4), 389–409. Reprinted by permission of Taylor & Francis, http://www.informaworld.com
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ehri, L.C., Rosenthal, J. (2010). Spellings of Words: A Neglected Facilitator of Vocabulary Learning. In: Aram, D., Korat, O. (eds) Literacy Development and Enhancement Across Orthographies and Cultures. Literacy Studies, vol 2. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0834-6_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0834-6_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-0833-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-0834-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)