Driver Behavior, Dilemma Zone, and Capacity at Red Light Camera Equipped Intersections

  • Yohannes Weldegiorgis
  • Manoj K. Jha


Driver behavior at an intersection equipped with a Red Light Camera (RLC) is one of the main factors contributing to the safety and operation of the intersection. A drivers’ decision whether to proceed through the intersection or stop when the signal changes from green to yellow depends on a number of factors, such as speed, geometric characteristics, driver’s attitude, to name a few. The decision with respect to the yellow signal may lead to traffic conflicts such as rear end and right angle collisions. Driver behavior when faced with a yellow signal can be viewed as a binary choice process, where the main decisions are either to stop or proceed through the intersection. In this paper, a discrete choice model of the stopping probability is developed using vehicles’ speed and distance from the stop bar when the driver is exposed to the yellow signal. A binary choice model is developed using the probability of stopping to the yellow signal as a function of approach speed, distance from intersection, and presence of a RLC. The existence of the Dilemma Zone (DZ) is estimated using dilemma zone curves developed from the probability of stopping vs. distance from stop bar at the onset of the yellow interval. The paper also presents a new approach to calculate the change in intersection capacity resulting from drivers stopping at the intersection at the onset of yellow interval.

Using field data from Baltimore, Maryland we show that the capacity of RLC equipped intersections may be lower than that at intersections without RLC.


Driver Behavior Transportation Research Record Approach Speed Yellow Signal Saturation Flow Rate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



This work was completed at the Center for Advanced Transportation and Infrastructure Engineering Research at the Morgan State University. It is part of the doctoral research work of the first author.


  1. Bonneson, J.A. and Zimmerman, K.H. (2004). Engineering Countermeasures to Reduce Red-light Running, report No. FHWA/TX-03/4027-2. Texas Transportation Institute. Texas A&M University System, College Station, Texas.Google Scholar
  2. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) (2005). Red Light Camera Systems Operational Guidelines. U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  3. Garber, N.J. and Hoel, L.A. (2002). Traffic Engineering and Highway Engineering. 3rd edition, Thomson Learning. Pacific Grove, California.Google Scholar
  4. Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) (2000). Transportation Research Board. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  5. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) (2004). Q&A: Red Light Running as of March 2004. Highway Loss Data Institute. Arlington, Virginia.Google Scholar
  6. Jha, M.K and Weldegiorgis, Y. (2009). A probabilistic approach to model driver behavior at signalized intersections with red light camera, accepted for Publication in the Journal of Advanced Transportation.Google Scholar
  7. Marshall, R. (2006). An Empirical Assessment of the Impact of Red Light Cameras on the Capacity of Urban Signalized Intersections. Doctor of Engineering Dissertation, Morgan State University, Baltimore, Maryland.Google Scholar
  8. Maryland State Highway Administration (MSHA) (2002). Evaluation of Maryland’s Accident Experience at Locations having Red Light Running Detection Cameras. Office of Traffic and Safety, Traffic Analysis Division. Hanover, Maryland.Google Scholar
  9. Milazzo II, J. (2001). The Effect of Dilemma Zones on Red Light Running Enforcement Tolerances. Institute for Transportation Research and Education, North Carolina State University. Raleigh, North Carolina.Google Scholar
  10. Porter, B.E. (1999). A Nationwide Survey of Red Light Running: Measuring Driver Behaviors for the "Stop Red Light Running" Program. Research Foundation: 57, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia.Google Scholar
  11. Porter, B.E. and England, K.J. (2000). Predicting red-light running behavior: a traffic safety study in three urban settings. Journal of Safety Research, 31, 1-8.Google Scholar
  12. Quiroga, C. (2003). Red Light Running – A Policy Review. Report No. TX-02/150206-1, Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University System, College Station, Texas.Google Scholar
  13. Retting, R.A. (2002). Changes in crash risk following re-timing of traffic signal change intervals. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 34, 215-220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Retting, R.A. and Greene, M.A. (1997). Influence of traffic signal timing on red-light running and potential vehicle conflicts at urban intersections. Transportation Research Record, 1595, 1-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Retting, R.A. and Williams, A.F. (1996). Characteristics of red light violators: results of a field investigation. Journal of Safety Research, 27, 9-15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Retting, R.A. (1998). Red-light running and sensible countermeasures: summary of research findings. Transportation Research Record,1640, 23-26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Schattler, K.L. and Datta, T.K. (2004). Driver behavior characteristics at urban signalized intersections. Transportation Research Record, 1862, 17-23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Schattler, K.L. (2002). Clearance interval design and red light violations. Proceeding of the ITE 2002 Spring conference and Exhibit (CD-ROM). Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  19. Sheffi, Y. and Mahmassani, H. (1981). A model of driver behavior at high speed intersections. Transportation Science,15, 50-61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tarawneh, T.M. (1999). Investigation of effectiveness of media advertising and police enforcement in reducing red-light violations. Transportation Research Record,1693, 37-45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Van der Horst, R. (1998). Driver decision making at traffic signals. Transportation Research Record 1172:93-97.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag US 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yohannes Weldegiorgis
    • 1
  • Manoj K. Jha
    • 1
  1. 1.Morgan State UniversityCaliforniaU.S.A

Personalised recommendations