Passive Left Ventricular Constraint Devices

  • Choon-Sik Jhun
  • Namrata Gundiah
  • Kay Sun
  • Hani N. Sabbah
  • E. Elaine Tseng
  • Mark B. Ratcliffe
  • Julius M. Guccione


Both myocardial infarction and volume overloading associated with regurgitant valve lesions lead to eccentric left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy. The mechanism is presumed to be positive feedback between diastolic LV wall stress and eccentric LV hypertrophy. Further, in each case, an increase in LV size is an important adverse prognostic finding. The experience with skeletal muscle cardiomyoplasty led to the hypothesis that passive constraint of LV enlargement would interrupt the diastolic stress and eccentric hypertrophy cycle, in addition to halting and possibly reversing the adverse LV remodeling. A number of passive constraint devices such as the Acorn CorCap™ Cardiac Support Device (CSD), Paracor Medical HeartNet™ Ventricular Support System (VSS), and Myocor™ yosplint® have been used. Most recently, an Adjustable Fluid Filled Balloon CSD was proposed by Ghanta and colleagues. In this chapter we model the effect of passive constraint devices, with the exception of the Paracor Medical HeartNet™ VSS, on the LV stroke volume/end-diastolic pressure (Starling) relationship and regional distributions of stress in the local muscle fiber direction.


Fiber Stress Pump Function Fabric Orientation Hyperelastic Model Eccentric Left Ventricular Hypertrophy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This research was supported by National Institutes of Health grant 5R01 HL077921 (Dr. Guccione) and 5R01 HL063348 (Dr. Ratcliffe). We thank Ms. Kimberly S. Yan, a technical writing expert for proof-reading of this chapter.


  1. 1.
    Hammermeister KE, DeRouen TA, Dodge HT. Variables predictive of survival in patients with coronary disease. Selection by univariate and multivariate analyses from the clinical, electrocardiographic, exercise, arteriographic, and quantitative angiographic evaluations. Circulation. 1979;59:421–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kostuk WJ, Kazamias TM, Gander MP, Simon AL, Ross J Jr. Left ventricular size after acute myocardial infarction. Serial changes and their prognostic significance. Circulation. 1973;47:1174–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shanoff HM, Little JA, Csima A, Yano R. Heart size and ten-year survival after uncomplicated myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 1969;78:608–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    White HD, Norris RM, Brown MA, Brandt PW, Whitlock RM, Wild CJ. Left ventricular end-systolic volume as the major determinant of survival after recovery from myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1987;76:44–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Douglas PS, Morrow R, Ioli A, Reichek N. Left ventricular shape, afterload and survival in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989;13:311–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Grossman W, Jones D, McLaurin LP. Wall stress and patterns of hypertrophy in the human left ventricle. J Clin Invest. 1975;56:56–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hagege AA, Desnos M, Fernandez F, Besse B, Mirochnik N, Castaldo M, Chachques JC, Carpentier A, Guerot C. Clinical study of the effects of latissimus dorsi muscle flap stimulation after cardiomyoplasty. Circulation. 1995;92:II210–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kass DA, Baughman KL, Pak PH, Cho PW, Levin HR, Gardner TJ, Halperin HR, Tsitlik JE, Acker MA. Reverse remodeling from cardiomyoplasty in human heart failure. External constraint versus active assist. Circulation. 1995;91:2314–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nakajima H, Niinami H, Hooper TL, Hammond RL, Nakajima HO, Lu H, Ruggiero R, Thomas GA, Mocek FW, Fietsam R Jr, et al. Cardiomyoplasty: probable mechanism of effectiveness using the pressure–volume relationship. Ann Thorac Surg. 1994;57:407–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    10. Blom AS, Mukherjee R, Pilla JJ, Lowry AS, Yarbrough WM, Mingoia JT, Hendrick JW, Stroud RE, McLean JE, Affuso J, Gorman RC, Gorman JH 3rd, Acker MA, Spinale FG. Cardiac support device modifies left ventricular geometry and myocardial structure after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2005;112(9):1274–1283.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cheng A, Nguyen TC, Malinowski M, Langer F, Liang D, Daughters GT, Ingels NB Jr, Miller DC. Passive ventricular constraint prevents transmural shear strain progression in left ventricle remodeling. Circulation. 2006;114:I79–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pilla JJ, Blom AS, Brockman DJ, Bowen F, Yuan Q, Giammarco J, Ferrari VA, Gorman JH 3rd, Gorman RC, Acker MA. Ventricular constraint using the acorn cardiac support device reduces myocardial akinetic area in an ovine model of acute infarction. Circulation. 2002;106:I207–11.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chaudhry PA, Mishima T, Sharov VG, Hawkins J, Alferness C, Paone G, Sabbah HN. Passive epicardial containment prevents ventricular remodeling in heart failure. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;70:1275–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Starling RC, Jessup M, Oh JK, Sabbah HN, Acker MA, Mann DL, Kubo SH. Sustained benefits of the CorCap Cardiac Support Device on left ventricular remodeling: three year follow-up results from the Acorn clinical trial. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84(4):1236–1242.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mann DL, Acker MA, Jessup M, Sabbah HN, Starling RC, Kubo SH. Clinical evaluation of the CorCap Cardiac Support Device in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84(4):1226–1235.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pelton A. Nitinol medical devices. Adv Mater Processes. 2005;163:S13(3).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Magovern JA. Experimental and clinical studies with the Paracor cardiac restraint device. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005:17, 364–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Magovern JA, Teekell-Taylor L, Mankad S, Dasika U, McGregor W, Biederman RW, Yamrozik J, Trumble DR. Effect of a flexible ventricular restraint device on cardiac remodeling after acute myocardial infarction. Asaio J. 2006;52(2):196–200.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cheng Y, Yi G, Hay I, Qin S, He K, Yue K, Li X, Tao Y, Wang J. A novel left ventricular passive support device alters the natural history of chronic heart failure in awake dogs. New Orleans, LA: AHA Scientific Sessions, 2004.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    McCarthy PM, Takagaki M, Ochiai Y, Young JB, Tabata T, Shiota T, Qin JX, Thomas JD, Mortier TJ, Schroeder RF, Schweich CJ Jr, Fukamachi K. Device-based change in left ventricular shape: a new concept for the treatment of dilated cardiomyopathy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;122:482–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ghanta RK, Rangaraj A, Umakanthan R, Lee L, Laurence RG, Fox JA, Bolman RM 3rd, Cohn LH, Chen FY. Adjustable, physiological ventricular restraint improves left ventricular mechanics and reduces dilatation in an ovine model of chronic heart failure. Circulation. 2007;115:1201–10.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Humphrey JD. Cardiovascular solid mechanics: cells, tissues, and organs. New York: Springer, 2002, p. 757, pp. xvi.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Guccione JM, Costa KD, McCulloch AD. Finite element stress analysis of left ventricular mechanics in the beating dog heart. J Biomech. 1995;28:1167–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Guccione, JM, Salahieh A, Moonly SM, Kortsmit J, Wallace AW, Ratcliffe MB. Myosplint decreases wall stress without depressing function in the failing heart: a finite element model study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;76:1171–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Walker JC, Ratcliffe MB, Zhang P, Wallace AW, Fata B, Hsu EW, Saloner D, Guccione JM. MRI-based finite-element analysis of left ventricular aneurysm. American journal of physiology. 2005;289(2):H692–700.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Oz MC, Konertz WF, Kleber FX, Mohr FW, Gummert JF, Ostermeyer J, Lass M, Raman J, Acker MA, Smedira N. Global surgical experience with the Acorn cardiac support device. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;126:983–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Walsh RG. Design and features of the Acorn CorCap Cardiac Support Device: the concept of passive mechanical diastolic support. Heart Fail Rev. 2005;10:101–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Choon-Sik Jhun
    • 1
  • Namrata Gundiah
    • 2
  • Kay Sun
    • 1
  • Hani N. Sabbah
    • 3
  • E. Elaine Tseng
    • 1
  • Mark B. Ratcliffe
    • 1
  • Julius M. Guccione
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryUniversity of California at San Francisco and San Francisco VA Medical CenterSan FranciscoUSA
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringIndian Institute of ScienceBangaloreIndia
  3. 3.Henry Ford HospitalDetroitUSA

Personalised recommendations