Numerical Simulations of the Penetration of Glass Using Two Pressure-Dependent Constitutive Models


Penetration of long gold (Au) rods into borosilicate glass was investigated experimentally as a function of impact velocity [1]. Flash radiography was used tomeasure the nose position and rod length as a function of time, and high-speed photography was used to measure the position of the failure front as a function of time. It was found that the failure front, which propagates at a speed much faster than the penetrating rod, quickly outdistances the projectile-target interface. Thus, except for the first few moments after impact, the rod presumably penetrates failed glass.


Impact Velocity Borosilicate Glass Equivalent Stress Triaxial Test Lower Impact Velocity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Behner T, Anderson CE, Orphal DL, Hohler V, Moll M and Templeton DW, (2008), Penetration and failure of lead and borosilicate glass against rod impact. Int. J. Impact Engng., 35:447–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Patel P and Matoya M, (2005), US Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen, MD, personal communication.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Desai CS and Siriwardane HJ, (1984), Constitutive laws for engineering materials with emphasis on geologic materials. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 07632.MATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dannemann KA, Chocron S, Nicholls AE and Anderson CE Jr, (2008), Compressive damage development in confined borosilicate glass. Materials Science and Engineering A - Structures, 478: 340–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen W and Ravichandran G, (1996), Static and dynamic compressive behavior of aluminum nitride under moderate confinement. J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 79:579–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen W and Ravichandran G, (1997), Dynamic compressive failure of a glass ceramic under lateral confinement. J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 45: 1303–1328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ma Z and Ravi-Chandar K, (2000), Confined compression: A stable homogeneous deformation for constitutive characterization. Experimental Mechanics, 40(38): 38–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lu J and Ravichandran G, (2003), Pressure-dependent behavior of Zr41.2Ti13.8Cu12.5Ni10Be22.5 bulk metallic glasses. J. Mater. Res., 18: 2039–2049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen W and Luo H, (2004), Dynamic compressive responses of intact and damaged ceramics from a single split hopkinson pressure bar experiment. Experimental Mechanics, 44(3): 295–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Forquin P, Árias A and Zaera R, (2006), An experimental method of measuring the confined compression strength of high-performance concretes to analyse their ballistic behaviour. J. Physique IV, 134: 629–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chocron S, Walker JD, Nicholls AE, Dannemann KA and Anderson CE Jr, (2008), Analytical model of the confined compression test used to characterize brittle materials. J. Appl. Mech. – Transactions of the ASME, 75: 021006–1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Drucker DC and Prager W, (1952), Soil Mechanics and plastic analysis of limit design, Q. Appl. Math, vol. 10, no. 2, 157–175.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chocron S, Dannemann K, Walker J, Nicholls A, Anderson C, (2009), Static and dynamic confined compression of borosilicate glass, to be published in the proceedings of the DYMAT conference, Belgium.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bourne NK, Millet JCF and Field JE, (1999), On the strength of shocked glasses. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, 455:1275–1282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nedderman RM, (1992), Statics and Kinematics of Granular Materials. Cambridge University Press, The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 2RU, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    McGlaun JM, Thompson SL, and Elrick MG, (1990), CTH: A three-dimensional shock wave physics code. Int. J. Impact Engng., 20:351–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chocron S, Dannemann KA, Walker JD, Nicholls AE, and Anderson CE Jr, (2007), Constitutive model for damaged borosilicate glass under confinement. J. Amer. Cer. Soc., 90(8):2549–2555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Steinberg DJ, (1996), Equation of state and strength properties of selected materials. UCRL-MA-106439, Change 1, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Anderson CE Jr, Chocron S and Behner T, (2009), A constitutive model for in-situ comminuted silicon carbide. J. Amer. Cer. Soc., accepted for publication.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Holmquist TJ, Johnson GR, Grady DE, Lopatin CM and Hertel ES Jr, (1995), High strain rate properties and constitutive modeling of glass. Proc. 15th Int. Symp. on Ballistics, 237–244, Jerusalem, Israel.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nayak GC and Zienkiewicz OC, (1972), Convenient for of stress invariants for plasticity. Journal of the Structural Division, Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers, 98(ST4): 949–954.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wilkins ML, (1999), Computer Simulation of Dynamic Phenomena. Springer, 1999.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Southwest Research InstituteEngineering Dynamics DepartmentSan AntonioUSA

Personalised recommendations