A Moody View of The Law: Looking Back and Looking Ahead at Law and The Emotions

  • Jeremy A. Blumenthal
Part of the Nebraska Symposium on Motivation book series (NSM, volume 56)


The current Symposium celebrates 3,400 years of law and emotion. How so? In Leviticus, Chapter 19 Verse 15, judges are instructed to judge rich and poor alike – interestingly, they are, separately, told not to favor the poor and not to favor the rich, but rather to do justice equally. Some interpreters read the prohibition on favoring the poor as trying to ensure that even positive emotions such as sympathy do not bias legal decision-making. Indeed, as this Chapter goes to press, the confirmation hearings for Judge Sonia Sotomayor are highlighting just such issues. Alternatively, we might say that we celebrate more than four centuries of law and emotion: In the late sixteenth century the common law began to recognize the offense of manslaughter, where a killing occurred in the course of a brawl or “chance [or chaunce] medley,” reflecting the passion or emotional state of those engaged in fighting (e.g., Brown 1963; Dressler 1982).1 We might also say that the psychological study of law and emotion is about 100 years old, harking back to the foundational legal psychological work of Hugo Munsterberg (1908) and his study of the biasing impact of emotion on memory and judgment, and of the clues that emotional reactions could give to a defendant’s guilt or innocence.


Moral Judgment Positive Emotion Negative Mood Hate Crime Eminent Domain 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Abrams K, Keren H (2007) Law in the cultivation of hope. Calif Law Rev 95:319–381Google Scholar
  2. Alicke MD (2000) Culpable control and the psychology of blame. Psychol Bull 126:556–574PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ask K, Granhag P (2007) Hot cognition in investigative judgments: The differential influence of anger and sadness. Law Hum Behav 31:537–552PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bagaric M, McConvill M (2005) Goodbye justice, hello happiness: Welcoming positive psychology to the law. Deakin Law Rev 10:1–26Google Scholar
  5. Bandes SA (1999) The passions of law. New York: NYU PressGoogle Scholar
  6. Barros DB (2009) Legal questions for the psychology of home. Tulane Law Rev 83:645–660Google Scholar
  7. Baumeister RF, Bratslavsky E, Muraven M, Tice DM (1998) Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource? J Pers Soc Psychol 74:1252–1265PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Beckham AS (1933) Over-suggestibility in juvenile delinquents. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 28:172–178Google Scholar
  9. Berkowitz L, Jaffee S, Jo E, Troccoli B (2000) On the correction of feeling-induced judgmental biases. In: Forgas JP (ed) Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 131–152Google Scholar
  10. Bernstein DM, Loftus EF (2009) The consequences of false memories for food memories and choices. Perspectives on Psychological Science 4:135–139. Unpublished manuscriptGoogle Scholar
  11. Blumenthal JA (March, 1998) Affective influences on moral reasoning: Implications for psychology and for law. Poster presented at the American Psychology-Law Society Conference, Redondo Beach, CA Blumenthal JA (2002) Law and social science in the twenty-first century. S Cal Interdisciplinary L Rev 12:1–53Google Scholar
  12. Blumenthal JA (2005a) Does mood influence moral judgment? An empirical test with legal and policy implications. Law Psychol Rev 29:1–28Google Scholar
  13. Blumenthal JA (2005b) Law and the emotions: The problems of affective forecasting. Indiana Law J 80:155–238Google Scholar
  14. Blumenthal JA (2007a) Emotional paternalism. Fla State Univ Law Rev 35:1–72Google Scholar
  15. Blumenthal JA (2007b) Perceptions of crime: A multidimensional analysis with implications for law and psychology. McGeorge Law Rev 38:629–651Google Scholar
  16. Blumenthal JA (2008) Abortion, persuasion, and emotion: Implications of social science research on emotion for reading Casey. Wash Law Rev 83:1–38Google Scholar
  17. Blumenthal JA (2009a) “To be human”: A psychological perspective on property law. Tulane Law Rev 83:609–644Google Scholar
  18. Blumenthal JA (March, 2009b) Group deliberation and the endowment effect: An experimental study. Paper presented at the American Psychology/Law Society Conference, San Antonio, TXGoogle Scholar
  19. Blumenthal JA, Huang, PH (Jan. 27, 2009). Positive parentalism. National Law Journal. 31:27Google Scholar
  20. Bornstein BH, Wiener RL (2006) Introduction to the special issue on emotion in legal judgment and decision making. Law Hum Behav 30:115–118Google Scholar
  21. Brown BJ (1963) The demise of chance medley and the recognition of provocation as a defense to murder in English law. Am J Leg Hist 7:310–318Google Scholar
  22. Buhai SL (2008) Emotional conflicts: Impaired dispassionate representation of family members. Georget J Leg Ethics 21:1159–1194Google Scholar
  23. Cairns, H (1935) Law and the social sciences. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & CoGoogle Scholar
  24. Carlsmith KM, Darley JM (2008) Psychological aspects of retributive justice. In: Zanna MP (ed) Advances in experimental social psychology, vol 40. Academic Press, New York, pp 193–236Google Scholar
  25. Carlsmith KM, Darley JM, Robinson PH (2002) Why do we punish? Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment. J Pers Soc Psychol 83:284–299PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Ceci SJ, Friedman RD (2000) The suggestibility of children: Scientific research and legal implications. Cornell Law Rev 86:34–108Google Scholar
  27. Coleman CH (1999) Procreative liberty and contemporaneous choice: An inalienable rights approach to frozen embryos disputes. Minn Law Rev 84:55–127PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Darley JM, Carlsmith KM, Robinson PH (2000) Incapacitation and just deserts as motives for punishment. Law Hum Behav 24:659–683PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Demaine LJ (2008) In search of an anti-elephant: Confronting the human inability to forget inadmissible evidence. George Mason Law Rev 16:99–140Google Scholar
  30. Diener E, Biswas-Diener R (2002) Will money increase subjective well-being? A literature review and guide to needed research. Soc Indic Res 57:119–169Google Scholar
  31. DiFonzo JH (2000) Customized marriage. Indiana Law J 75:875–962Google Scholar
  32. Douglas KS, Lyon DR, Ogloff JR (1997) The impact of graphic photographic evidence on mock jurors’ decisions in a murder trial: Probative or prejudicial? Law Hum Behav 21:485–501PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Dressler J (1982) Rethinking heat of passion: A defense in search of a rationale. J Crim Law Criminol 73:421–470Google Scholar
  34. Dunn J, Schweitzer M (2005) Feeling and believing: The influence of emotion on trust. J Pers Soc Psychol 88:736–748PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Easterlin R (1995) Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all? J Econ Behav Organ 27:35–48Google Scholar
  36. Feigenson N (1997) Sympathy and legal judgment. Tenn Law Rev 65:1–78Google Scholar
  37. Feigenson N (2000) Legal blame: How jurors think and talk about accidents. American Psychological Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  38. Feigenson N (2001) Another thing needful: Exploring emotions in law [review of Susan Bandes (ed) The Passions of Law]. Const Comment 18:445–461Google Scholar
  39. Feigenson N, Park J (2006) Emotions and attributions of legal responsibility and blame: A research review. Law Hum Behav 30:143–161PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Ferguson v. Moore (Tenn. 1897) 39 S.W. 341Google Scholar
  41. Fernberger SW (1930) Can an emotion be accurately judged by its facial expression alone? Am Institute Crim Law Criminol 20:554–564Google Scholar
  42. Fincham FD, Jaspars JM (1980) Attribution of responsibility: From man the scientist to man as lawyer. In: Berkowitz L (ed) Advances in experimental social psychology, vol 13. Academic Press, New York, pp 81–138Google Scholar
  43. Fishfader VL, Howells GN, Katz RC, Teresi PS (1996) Evidential and extralegal factors in juror decisions: Presentation mode, retention, and level of emotionality. Law Hum Behav 20:565–572Google Scholar
  44. Forgas JP (1990) Affective influences on individual and group judgments. Eur J Soc Psychol 20:441–453Google Scholar
  45. Forgas JP (1995) Mood and judgment: The Affect Infusion Model (AIM). Psychol Bull 117:39–66PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Forgas JP (2002) Feeling and doing: Affective influences on interpersonal behavior. Psychol Inq 13:1–28Google Scholar
  47. Forgas JP, Ciarrochi J (2001) On being happy and possessive: The interactive effects of mood and personality on consumer judgments. Psychol Mark 18:239–260Google Scholar
  48. Forgas JP, Moylan S (1987) After the movies: Transient mood and social judgments. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 13:467–477Google Scholar
  49. Frank RH (1999) Luxury fever: Why money fails to satisfy in an era of success. The Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  50. Fredrickson BL (2001) The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Am Psychol 56:218–226PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Gardner v. Florida (1977) 430 U.S. 349Google Scholar
  52. Gorn GJ, Goldberg ME, Basu K (1993) Mood, awareness, and product evaluation. J Consum Psychol 2:237–256Google Scholar
  53. Greene JD, Sommerville RB, Nystrom LE, Darley JM, Cohen JD (2001) An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science 293:2105–2108PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Grisso T, Saks MJ (1991) Psychology’s influence on constitutional interpretation: A comment on how to succeed. Law Hum Behav 15:205–211Google Scholar
  55. Guthrie C, Sally D (2004) The impact of the impact bias on negotiation. Marquette Law Rev 87:817–828Google Scholar
  56. Haidt JD (2001) The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social-intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychol Rev 108:814–834PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Hanson JD, Kysar DA (1999) Taking behavioralism seriously: Some evidence of market manipulation. Harv Law Rev 112:1420–1572PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Harlé KM, Sanfey AG (2007) Incidental sadness biases social economic decisions in the ultimatum game. Emotion 7:876–881PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Hauser MD (2006) Moral minds: How nature designed our universal sense of right and wrong. HarperCollins, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  60. Heiner v. Moretuzzo (Ohio 1995) 652 N.E.2d 664, 670Google Scholar
  61. Hill CA, O’Hara EA (2007) A cognitive theory of trust. Wash Univ Law Rev 84:1717–1796Google Scholar
  62. Holmes OW Jr (1897) The path of the law. Harv Law Rev 10:457–478Google Scholar
  63. Horowitz IA, Kerr NL, Park ES, Goedel C (2006) Chaos in the courtroom reconsidered: Emotional bias and juror nullification. Law Hum Behav 30:163–181PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Huang PH (2000) Reasons within passions: Emotions and intentions in property rights bargaining. Oregon Law Rev 79:435–478Google Scholar
  65. Huang PH (2005) Moody investing and the Supreme Court: Rethinking the materiality of information and the reasonableness of investor. Supreme Court Econ Rev 13:99–131Google Scholar
  66. Huang PH, Anderson CJ (2006) A psychology of emotional legal decision making: Revulsion and saving face in legal theory and practice. Minn Law Rev 90:1045–1071Google Scholar
  67. Huang PH, Blumenthal JA (2009a) Positive law and policy, in Encyclopedia of Positive Psychology 730–733 (Shane J. Lopez ed)Google Scholar
  68. Huang PH, Blumenthal JA (2009b) Positive policy/positive institutions, in Handbook of Positive Psychology 589–597 (C.R. Snyder & Shane J. Lopez eds., 2nd ed.)Google Scholar
  69. Huang PH, Wu H-M (1992) Emotional responses in litigation. Int Rev Law Econ 23:31–44Google Scholar
  70. Inbau FE (1935) Detection of deception technique admitted as evidence. J Crim Law Criminol 26:262–271Google Scholar
  71. Inbau FE (1942) Lie detection and criminal investigation. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, MDGoogle Scholar
  72. Isbell LM, Wyer RS Jr (1999) Correcting for mood-induced bias in the evaluation of political candidates: The roles of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 25(2):237–249Google Scholar
  73. K.A.C. v. Benson (Minn. 1995) 527 N.W.2d 553Google Scholar
  74. Kahan DM (1999) The progressive appropriation of disgust. In: Bandes SA (ed) The Passions of Law. NYU Press, New York, pp 63–79Google Scholar
  75. Kahan DM (2008) Two conceptions of emotion in risk regulation. Univ PA Law Rev 156:741–766Google Scholar
  76. Kahan DM, Braman D (2006) Cultural cognition and public policy. Yale Law Policy Rev 24:149–172Google Scholar
  77. Kahan DM, Nussbaum M (1996) Two conceptions of emotion in criminal law. Columbia Law Rev 96:269–374Google Scholar
  78. Kahan DM, Hoffman DA, Braman D (2009) Whose eyes are you going to believe? Scott v. Harris and the perils of cognitive illiberalism. Harvard Law Review 122:837–906Google Scholar
  79. Kaplan MF, Miller LE (1978) Reducing the effects of juror bias. J Pers Soc Psychol 63:1443–1455Google Scholar
  80. Kelo v. City of New London (2005) 545 U.S. 469 Google Scholar
  81. Kerr NL, Boster FJ, Callen CR, Braz ME, O’Brien B, Horowitz I (2008) Jury nullification instructions as amplifiers of bias. Int Commentary Evid 6Google Scholar
  82. Koenigs M, Young L, Adolphs R, Tranel D, Cushman F, Hauser M, Damasio A (2007) Damage to the prefrontal cortex increases utilitarian moral judgements. Nature 446:908–911PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Korobkin R (2003a) Bounded rationality, standard form contracts, and unconscionability. Univ Chic Law Rev 70:1203–1295Google Scholar
  84. Korobkin R (2003b) The endowment effect and legal analysis. Northwest Law Rev 97:1227–1293Google Scholar
  85. Levine LJ, Burgess SL, Laney C (2008) Effects of discrete emotions on young children’s suggestibility. Dev Psychol 44:681–694PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Lieberman JD, Arndt J, Personius J, Cook A (2001) Vicarious annihilation: The effects of mortality salience on perceptions of hate crimes. Law Hum Behav 25:547–566PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Liptak A (2007) When rendering decisions, judges are finding law reviews irrelevant. New York TimesGoogle Scholar
  88. Little LE (2001) Negotiating the tangle of law and emotion. Cornell Law Rev 86:974–1001Google Scholar
  89. Loewenstein G, Lerner JS (2003) The role of affect in decision making. In: Davidson RJ, Scherer KR, Hill Goldsmith H (eds) Handbook of affective sciences. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 619–642Google Scholar
  90. Loewenstein G, Hsee CK, Weber EU, Welch N (2001) Risk as feelings. Psychol Bull 127:267–286PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Maldonado S (2008) Cultivating forgiveness: Reducing hostility and conflict after divorce. Wake Forest Law Rev 43:441–504Google Scholar
  92. Maroney TA (2006) Law and emotion: A proposed taxonomy of an emerging field. Law Hum Behav 30:119–142PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Marrow PB (2003) Crafting a remedy for the naughtiness of procedural unconscionability. Cumberland Law Rev 34:11–64Google Scholar
  94. Marston WM (1917) Systolic blood pressure symptoms of deception. J Exp Psychol 2:117–163Google Scholar
  95. Marston WM (1921) Psychological possibilities in the deception tests. J Crim Law Criminol 11:551–570Google Scholar
  96. Martin P (2005) Making happy people: The nature of happiness and its origins in childhood. Fourth Estate, LondonGoogle Scholar
  97. McNally RJ, Lasko NB, Clancy SA, Macklin ML, Pitman RK, Orr SP (2004) Psychophysiologic responding during script-driven imagery in people reporting abduction by space aliens. Psychol Sci 15:493–497PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. Mitchell G (2003) Tendencies versus boundaries: Levels of generality in behavioral law and economics. Vanderbilt Law Rev 56:1781–1812Google Scholar
  99. Mitchell G (2004) Empirical legal scholarship as scientific dialogue. North Carol Law Rev 83:167–204Google Scholar
  100. Montgomery JE (2008) Incorporating emotional intelligence concepts into legal education: Strengthening the professionalism of law students. Univ Toledo Law Rev 39:323–352Google Scholar
  101. Morse SJ (2004) Book review [reviewing Susan A. Bandes (ed) The Passions of Law]. Ethics 114:601–604Google Scholar
  102. Munsterberg H (1908) On the witness stand. Doubleday, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  103. Muraven M, Baumeister RF (2000) Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle? Psychol Bull 126:247–259PubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. Muraven M, Tice DM, Baumeister RF (1998) Self-control as limited resource: Regulatory depletion patterns. J Pers Soc Psychol 74:774–789PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. Noddings N (2003) Happiness and education. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  106. Nussbaum MC (1999) Secret sewers of vice: Disgust, bodies, and the law. In: Bandes SA (ed) The Passions of Law. NYU Press, New York, pp 19–62Google Scholar
  107. Ogloff JRP (2000) Two steps forward and one step backward: The law and psychology movement(s) in the 20th century. Law & Human Behavior 24:457–483Google Scholar
  108. O’Grady CG (2006) Cognitive optimism and professional pessimism in the large-firm practice of law: The optimistic associate. Law Psychol Rev 30:23Google Scholar
  109. Olejnik AB, LaRue AA (1980) Affect and moral reasoning. Soc Behav Pers 8:75–79Google Scholar
  110. Park J, Banaji MR (2000) Mood and heuristics: The influence of happy and sad states on sensitivity and bias in stereotyping. J Pers Soc Psychol 78:1005–1023PubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. Pate RR, Davis MG, Robinson TN, Stone EJ, McKenzie TL, Young JC (2006) Promoting physical activity in children and youth: A leadership role for schools: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on nutrition, physical activity, and metabolism (physical activity committee) in collaboration with the councils on cardiovascular disease in the young and cardiovascular nursing. Circulation 114:1214–1224PubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. Rachlinski JJ (2006) Cognitive errors, individual differences, and paternalism. Univ Chic Law Rev 73:207–229Google Scholar
  113. Robinson PH, Kurzban R, Jones OD (2007) The origins of shared intuitions of justice. Vanderbilt Law Rev 60:1633–1688Google Scholar
  114. Rottenstreich Y, Hsee CK (1999) Money, kisses, and electric shocks: On the affective psychology of risk. Psychol Sci 12:185–190Google Scholar
  115. Saks MJ (1986) The law does not live by eyewitness testimony alone. Law and Human Behavior 10:279–280Google Scholar
  116. Satin MI (1995) Law and psychology: A movement whose time has come. Annu Surv Am Law 1994:581–630Google Scholar
  117. Schimel J, Simon L, Greenberg J, Pyszczynski T, Solomon S, Waxmonsky J, Arndt J (1999) Stereotypes and terror management: Evidence that mortality salience enhances stereotypic thinking and preferences. J Pers Soc Psychol 77:905–926PubMedGoogle Scholar
  118. Schwarz N, Clore G (1983) Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. J Pers Soc Psychol 45:513–523Google Scholar
  119. Schwarz N, Bless H, Bohner G (1991) Mood and persuasion: Affective states influence the processing of persuasive communications. In: Zanna M (ed) Advances in experimental social psychology, vol 24. Academic Press, New York, pp 161–199Google Scholar
  120. Seligman MEP, Csikszentmihalyi M (2000) Positive psychology: An introduction. Am Psychol 55:5PubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. Seligman MEP, Verkuil P, Kang T (2001) Why lawyers are unhappy. Cardozo Law Rev 23:33–53Google Scholar
  122. Semmler C, Brewer N (2002) Effects of mood and emotion on juror processing and judgments. Behav Sci Law 20:423–436PubMedGoogle Scholar
  123. Shaver K (1985) The attribution of blame: Causality, responsibility, and blameworthiness. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  124. Sherman SJ, Hoffman JL (2007) The psychology and law of voluntary manslaughter: What can psychology research teach us about the “heat of passion” defense? J Behav Decis Making 20:499–519Google Scholar
  125. Silver MA (1999) Love, hate, and other emotional interference in the lawyer/client relationship. Clin Law Rev 6:259–313Google Scholar
  126. Skovran LC, Wiener RL (2008) The role of anger in juror decision making in capital murder cases. Paper presented at the American Psychology/Law Society Conference, Jacksonville, FLGoogle Scholar
  127. Small MA (2002) Legal psychology and therapeutic jurisprudence. St Louis Univ Law J 37:675–700Google Scholar
  128. Smith HW (1944) Relation of emotions to injury and disease: Legal liability for psychic stimuli. Va Law Rev 30:193–306Google Scholar
  129. Smith MR (2002) Advanced legal writing. Aspen Law and BusinessGoogle Scholar
  130. Stake JE (2001) The uneasy case for adverse possession. Georget Law J 89:2419–2473Google Scholar
  131. Stanchi KM (2002) Feminist legal writing. San Diego Law Rev 39:387–436Google Scholar
  132. Stanchi KM (2005) Moving beyond instinct: Persuasion in the era of professional legal writing. Lewis Clark Law Rev 9:935–950Google Scholar
  133. Sternlight JR, Robbennolt J (2008) Good lawyers should be good psychologists: Insights for interviewing and counseling clients. Ohio State J Dispute Resolut 23:437–548Google Scholar
  134. Sunstein CR (2002) Probability neglect: Emotions, worst cases, and law. Yale Law J 112:61–107Google Scholar
  135. Tabibnia G, Satpute AB, Lieberman MD (2008) The sunny side of fairness: Preference for fairness activates reward circuitry (and disregarding unfairness activates self-control circuitry). Psychol Sci 19:339–347PubMedGoogle Scholar
  136. Tiedens LZ, Linton S (2001) Judgment under emotional certainty and uncertainty: The effects of specific emotions and their associated certainty appraisals on cognitive processing. J Pers Soc Psychol 81:973–988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  137. Valdesolo P, DeSteno D (2006) Manipulations of emotional context shape moral judgment. Psychol Sci 17:476–477PubMedGoogle Scholar
  138. van Boven L (2005) Experientialism, materialism, and the pursuit of happiness. Rev Gen Psychol 9:132–142Google Scholar
  139. van Boven L, Gilovich T (2003) To do or to have? That is the question. J Pers Soc Psychol 85:1193–1202PubMedGoogle Scholar
  140. Weiner B (1995) Judgments of responsibility: A foundation for a theory of social conduct. Guilford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  141. Wells JM (1992) The influence of affective arousal on moral reasoning in men and women. Unpublished PhD dissertation, California School of Professional PsychologyGoogle Scholar
  142. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. McKenzie (Ark. 1910) 131 S.W. 684, 685Google Scholar
  143. Wexler DB (2008) Two decades of therapeutic jurisprudence. Touro Law Rev 24:17–29Google Scholar
  144. Wexler DB, Winick BJ (1996) Law in a therapeutic key: Developments in therapeutic jurisprudence. Carolina Academic Press, Durham, NCGoogle Scholar
  145. Whipple GM (1914) Psychology of testimony and report. Psychol Bull 11:245–250Google Scholar
  146. Wiener RL, Hurt LE (1997) Social sexual conduct at work: How do workers know when it is harassment and when it is not? Calif West Law Rev 34:53–97Google Scholar
  147. Wiener RL, Block-Lieb S, Gross K, Baron-Donovan C (2005) Unwrapping assumptions: Applying social analytic jurisprudence to consumer bankruptcy education requirements and policy. Am Bankruptcy Law J 79:453–483Google Scholar
  148. Wiener RL, Bornstein BH, Voss A (2006) Emotion and the law: A framework for inquiry. Law Hum Behav 30:231–248PubMedGoogle Scholar
  149. Wiener RL, Holtje M, Winter RJ, Cantone JA, Gross K, Block-Lieb S (2007) Consumer credit card use: The roles of creditor disclosure and anticipated emotion. J Exp Psychol: Appl 13:32–46Google Scholar
  150. Wout Mv, Kahn RS, Sanfey AG, Aleman A (2006) Affective state and decision-making in the ultimatum game. Exp Brain Res 169:564–568Google Scholar
  151. Wyman KM (2007) The measure of just compensation. Univ Calif Davis Law Rev 41:239–287Google Scholar
  152. Xiao E, Houser D (2006) Emotion expression in human punishment behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci 102:7398–7401Google Scholar
  153. Young L, Koenigs M (2007) Investigating emotion in moral cognition: A review of evidence from functional neuroimaging and neuropsychology. Br Med Bull 84:69–79PubMedGoogle Scholar
  154. Zarinpoush F, Cooper M, Moylan S (2000) The effects of happiness and sadness on moral reasoning. J Moral Educ 29:397–412Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Syracuse University College of LawSyracuseUSA

Personalised recommendations