Skip to main content

Proximate Causation, Group Selection, and the Evolution of Hierarchical Human Societies: System, Process, and Pattern

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Macroevolution in Human Prehistory

Abstract

Social structure is an emergent property of a group; it cannot be the property of any single individual. It is an aspect of a culture and, as such, constrained by that culture’s Bauplan; and a Bauplan that incorporates egalitarianism will not permit hierarchy. Explanations for the evolution of complex societies at best pay lip service to these constraints, proceeding from the position that egalitarianism and hierarchy represent a social continuum capable of being readily traversed. This ignores the well-documented diligence with which egalitarian societies maintain their egalitarianism. They also proceed from the assumption that the organizational benefits of complexity are the reason it evolves. This essay proposes that complexity is a product of group selection. It proposes that the organizational benefits are exaptations, built on authority only after it already exists, and which first develops to provide a more primitive benefit, conflict resolution. It further suggests that in contexts where the maintenance of group unity confers a net top-down advantage to an egalitarian group’s members, even after factoring in loss of personal autonomy, egalitarian Baupläne will be abandoned and replaced by hierarchical ones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arnold, A.J. and Fristrup, K. (1982). The Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection: A Hierarchical Expansion. Paleobiology 8: 113–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bender, B. (1990). The Dynamics of Nonhierarchical Societies. In S. Upham (Ed.), The Evolution of Political Systems: Sociopolitics is Small-Scale Sedentary Societies (pp. 247–263). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanton, R.G., Feinman, G., Kowalewski, S. and Peregrine, P. (1996). A Dual-Processual Theory for the Evolution of Mesoamerican Civilization. Current Anthropology 37:1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bliege Bird, R.L. and Bird, D.W. (1997). Delayed Reciprocity and Tolerated Theft: The Behavioral Ecology of Food Sharing Strategies. Current Anthropology 38:49–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blurton Jones, N.G. (1984). A Selfish Origin for Human Food Sharing: Tolerated Theft. Ethology and Sociobiology 5:1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blurton Jones, N.G. (1987). Tolerated Theft: Suggestions About the Ecology and Evolution of Sharing, Hoarding, and Scrounging. Social Science Information 26:31–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, C. (1993). Egalitarian Behavior and Reverse Dominance Hierarchy. Current Anthropology 34: 227–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, C. (1999). Hierarchy in the Forest: The Evolution of Egalitarian Behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, C. (2000). Conflict and the Evolution of Social Control. Journal of Consciousness Studies 7:79–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boone, J.L. (1992). Competition, Conflict, and the Development of Social Hierarchies. In E.A. Smith and B. Winterhalder (Eds.), Evolutionary Ecology and Human Behavior (pp. 301–337). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boone, J.L. and Smith, E.A. (1998). Is It Evolution Yet? A Critique of Evolutionary Archaeology. Current Anthropology 39:S141–S173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgerhoff Mulder, M. (1990). Kipsigis Women’s Preferences for Wealthy Men: Evidence for Female Choice in Mammals. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 27:255–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgerhoff Mulder, M. (1992). Reproductive Decisions. In E.A. Smith and B. Winterhalder (Eds.), Evolutionary Ecology and Human Behavior (pp. 339–374). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boserup, E. (1965). The Conditions of Agricultural Growth. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R. and Richerson, P.J. (1992). Punishment Allows the Evolution of Cooperation (or Anything Else) in Sizable Groups. Ethology and Sociobiology 13:171–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandon, R.N. (1988). Levels of Selection: A Hierarchy of Interactors. In H.C. Plotkin (Ed.), The Role of Behavior in Evolution (pp. 51–71). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandon, R.N. (1990). Adaptation and Environment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, D.P. (1990). Selection and Evolution in Nonhierarchical Organization. In S. Upham (Ed.), The Evolution of Political Systems: Sociopolitics is Small-Scale Sedentary Societies (pp. 62–86). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carneiro, R. (1970). A Theory of the Origin of the State. Science 169:733–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carneiro, R. (1998). What Happened at the Flashpoint: Conjectures on Chiefdom Formation at the Very Moment of Conception. In E.M. Redmond (Ed.), Chiefdoms and Chieftaincy in the Americas (pp. 18–42). Gainsville, FL: University Press of Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cashdan, E.A. (1980). Egalitarianism Among Hunters and Gatherers. American Anthropologist 82: 116–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatters, J.C. and Prentiss, W.C. (2005). A Darwinian Macroevolutionary Perspective on the Development of Hunter-Gatherer Systems in Northwestern North America. World Archaeology 37:46–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crumley, C.L. (1987). A Dialectical Critique of Hierarchy. In T. Patterson and C. Gailey (Eds.), Power Relations and State Formation (pp. 115–159). Washington, DC: American Anthropological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crumley, C.L. (1995). Heterarchy and the Analysis of Complex Societies. In R.M. Ehrenrich et al. (Eds.), Heterarchy and the Analysis of Complex Societies (pp. 1–6). Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association 6. Washington, DC: American Anthropological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damuth, J. (1985). Selection Among Species: A Formulation in Terms of Natural Functional Units. Evolution 39:1132–1146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damuth, J. and Heisler, J.L. (1988). Alternative Formulations of Multilevel Selection. Biology and Philosophy 3:407–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1871). The Descent of Man and Evolution in Relation to Sex. London: Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (1986). The Blind Watchmaker. Harlow: Longham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (1989). The Selfish Gene (new edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (1990). The Extended Phenotype: The Long Reach of the Gene (new edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J. (1997). Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugatkin L.A. and Reeve, H.K. (1994). Behavioral Ecology and Levels of Selection. Advances in the Study of Behavior 23:101–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunnell, R.C. (1980). Evolutionary Theory and Archaeology. In M.B. Schiffer (ed.), Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, vol.3 (pp. 35–99). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunnell, R.C. (1985). Methodological Issues in Americanist Artifact Classification. In M.B. Schiffer (Ed.), Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, vol.9 (pp. 149–207). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunnell, R.C. (1995). What is it That Actually Evolves? In P.A. Teltser (Ed.), Evolutionary Archaeology: Methodological Issues (pp. 33–50). Tucson: University of Arizona Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durham, W.H. (1991) Coevolution: Genes, Culture, and Human Diversity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W.D. (1971). Selection of Selfish and Altruistic Behavior in Some Extreme Models. In E. Eisenberg and W.S. Dillon (eds.), Man and Beast: Comparative Social Behavior (pp. 57–91). Washington, DC: Smithsonian Inst. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, N. (1985). Unfinished Synthesis: Biological Hierarchies and Modern Evolutionary Thought. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, N. (1989). Macroevolutionary Patterns and Evolutionary Dynamics: Species, Niches and Adaptive Peaks. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, N. (1999). The Pattern of Evolution. New York: W.H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, N. and Gould, S.J. (1972) Punctuated Equilibria: An Alternative to Phyletic Gradualism. In T.J.M. Schopf (Ed.), Models in Paleobiology (pp. 82–115). San Francisco: Freeman, Cooper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellen, R. (1982). Environment, Subsistence, and System: The Ecology of Small-Scale Social Formations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R.A. (1958). The Genetical Theory of Evolution (Second Edition). New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flannery, K.V. (1972). The Cultural Evolution of Civilization. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 3:399–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghirlanda, S., Enquist, M. and Nakamura, M. (2006). Cultural Evolution Develops Its Own Rules. Current Anthropology 47:1027–1034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodenough, W.H. (1981). Culture, Language, and Society (second edition). Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J. and Vrba, S. (1982). Exaptation – a Missing Term in the Science of Form. Paleobiology 8:4–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J. (1982). The Meaning of Punctuated Equilibrium and Its Role in Validating a Hierarchical Approach to Macroevolution. In R. Milkman (Ed.), Perspectives on Evolution (pp. 83–104). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J. (2002). The Structure of Evolutionary Theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J. and Eldredge, N. (1977). Punctuated Equilibria: The Tempo and Mode of Evolution Reconsidered. Paleobiology 3:115–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J. and Lewontin, R.C. (1979). The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationist Programme. Proceedings of Royal Society London Series B 205:581–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grantham, T.A. (1995) Hierarchical Approaches to Macroevolution: Recent Work on Species Selection and the “Effect Hypothesis.” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 26: 301–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W.D. (1987). Discriminating Nepotism: Expectable, Common, Overlooked. In D.S.C. Fletcher and C.D. Michener (Eds.), Kin Recognition in Animals (pp. 417–437). New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, K. (1993). Why Hunter-Gathers Work: An Ancient Version of the Problem of Public Goods. Current Anthropology 34:341–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, G.A. (1978). Information Sources and the Development of Decision-Making Organizations. In C. Redman et al. (Eds.), Social Archaeology: Beyond Subsistence and Dating (pp. 87–112). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, G.A. (1983). Decision-Making Organization and Pastoral Nomad Camp Size. Human Ecology 11:175–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G.T., Leonard, R.D. and Abbott, A.L. (1995). The Structure of Selectionist Explanations in Archaeology. In P.A. Teltser (Ed.), Evolutionary Archaeology: Methodological Issues (pp. 13–32). Tucson: University of Arizona Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan H.S. and Lancaster, J.B. (2000). The Evolutionary Economics and Psychology of the Demographic Transition to Low Fertility. In L. Cronk, et al. (Ed.) Adaptation and Human Behavior (pp. 283–322). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeley, L.H. (1996). War Before Civilization: The Myth of the Peaceful Savage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirch, P.V. (1984). The Evolution of Polynesian Chiefdoms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, J.R. (1978). Optimal Foraging: Decision Rules for Predators. In J.R. Krebs and N.B. Davies (Ed.), Behavioral ecology: An evolutionary Approach (pp. 23–63). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laland, K.N. and Brown, G.R. (2002). Sense and Nonsense: Evolutionary Perspectives on Human Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R.B. (1979). The!Kung San: Men, Women, and Work in a Foraging Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, R.D. and Jones G.T. (1987). Elements of an Inclusive Evolutionary Model for Archaeology. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 6:199–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, R. (1967). The Internalization of Political Values in Stateless Societies. In R. Hunt (Ed.), Personalities and Cultures: Readings in Psychological Anthropology (pp. 185–203). Garden City, NY: Natural History Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R.C. (1970). The Units of Selection. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1:1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, E.A. (1988). The Structure and Confirmation of Evolutionary Theory. New York: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Low, B.S. (2000). Sex, Wealth, and Fertility: Old Rules, New Environments. In L. Cronk, et al. (Eds.), Adaptation and Human Behavior (pp. 323–344). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowie, R. (1973). Political Organization among American Indians. In D. Black and M. Mileski (Eds.), Social Organization of Law (pp. 278–303). New York: Seminar Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mace, R. (2000). An Adaptive Model of Human Reproductive Rate Where Wealth Is Inherited: Why People Have Small Families. In L. Cronk, et al. (Eds.), Adaptation and Human Behavior (pp. 261–281). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maybury-Lewis, D. (1974). Akwe-Shavante Society. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, M.A., Page, K.M. and Sigmund, K. (2000). Fairness Versus Reason in the Ultimatum Game. Science 289:1773–1775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, M.J. and Lyman, R.L. (2000). Applying Evolutionary Archaeology: A Systemic Approach. New York: Kluwer/Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prentiss, A.M. (2010). Social Histories of Complex Hunter-Gatherers: Pacific Northwest Prehistory in a Macroevolutionary Framework. In K.E. Sassaman and D.H. Holly, Jr. (Eds.), Hunter-Gatherer Archaeology as Historical Process. Tucson: University of Arizona Press (in review).

    Google Scholar 

  • Prentiss, W.C. and Chatters, J.C. (2003). Cultural Diversification and Decimation in the Prehistoric Record. Current Anthropology 44:33–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, R. (1968). Pigs for the Ancestors. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richerson, P.J. and Boyd, R. (1992). Cultural Inheritance and Evolutionary Ecology. In E.A. Smith and B. Winterhalder (Eds.), Evolutionary Ecology and Human Behavior (pp. 61–92). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richerson, P.J. and Boyd, R. (1999). Complex Societies: The Evolutionary Origins of a Crude Superorganism. Human Nature 10:253–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridley, M. (1993). The Red Queen: Sex and the Evolution of Human Nature. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rindos, D. (1984). The Origin of Agricultural Systems: An Evolutionary Perspective. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rindos, D. (1985). Darwinian Selection, Symbolic Variation, and the Evolution of Culture. Current Anthropology 26:65–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M. (1990). The Mother of Invention: Evolutionary Theory, Territoriality, and the Origins of Agriculture. American Anthropologist 92:399–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M. (1994). Pattern, Process, and Hierarchy in the Evolution of Culture. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 13:307–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M. (1998). Cheating at Musical Chairs: Sedentism in an Evolutionary Context. Current Anthropology 39:653–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Service, E.R. (1975). Origins of the State and Civilization: The Process of Cultural Evolution. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E.A. (1985). Inuit Foraging Groups: Some Simple Models Incorporating Conflicts of Interest, Relatedness, and Central Place Sharing. Ethology and Sociobiology 6:27–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E.A. (2000). Three Styles in the Evolutionary Analysis of Human Behavior. In L. Cronk et al. (Eds.), Adaptation and Human Behavior (pp. 27–46). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E. and Wilson, D.S. (1998). Unto Others: The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, C.S. (1993). Human Agency, Biased Transmission, and the Cultural Evolution of Chiefly Authority. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 12:41–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, C.S (1997). Evolutionary Approaches in Archaeology. Journal of Archaeological Research 5:209–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, C.S (1998). A Mathematical Model of Primary State Formation. Cultural Dynamics 10: 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanish, C. (2004). The Evolution of Chiefdoms: An Economic Anthropological Model. In G.M. Feinman and L.M. Nicholas (Eds.), Archaeological Perspectives on Political Economies (pp. 7–24). Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanish, C. and Haley, K.J. (2005). Power, Fairness, and Architecture: Modeling Early Chiefdom Development in the Central Andes. In K.J. Vaughn et al. (Eds.), Foundations of Power in the Prehispanic Andes (pp. 53–70). Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association 14, Arlington, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, S.M. (1981). The New Evolutionary Timetable: Fossils, Genes, and the Origin of Species. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tainter, J.A. (1988). The Collapse of Complex Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Furer-Haimendorf, C. (1969). Morals and Merit: A Study of Values and Social Controls in South Asian Societies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrba, E.S. (1983) Macroevolutionary Trends: New Perspectives on the Roles of Adaptation and Incidental Effect. Science 221:387–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vrba, E.S. (1984). What is Species Selection? Systematic Zoology 33:318–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vrba, E.S. (1989). Levels of Selection and Sorting with Special Reference to the Species. Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology 6:111–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrba, E.S. and Eldredge, N. (1984). Individuals, Hierarchies and Processes: Towards a More Complete Evolutionary Theory. Paleobiology 10:146–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrba, E.S. and Gould, S.J. (1986). The Hierarchical Expansion of Sorting and Selection: Sorting and Selection Cannot be Equated. Paleobiology 12:217–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Waal, F.B.M. (1982) Chimpanzee Politics: Power and Sex among Apes. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Waal, F.B.M. (1996). Good Natured: The Origins of Right and Wrong in Humans and Other Animals. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, M. (1978). A Critical Review of the Models of Group Selection. Quarterly Review of Biology 53:101–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G.C. (1966) Adaptation and Natural Selection: A Critique of Some Current Evolutionary Thought. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E.O. (1975). Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D.S. (1997). Hunting, Sharing, and Multilevel Selection. Current Anthropology 39:73–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D.S. and Sober, E. (1994). Re-Introducing Group Selection to the Human Behavioral Sciences. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17:585–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittfogel, K.A. (1957). Oriental Despotism: A Comparative Study of Total Power. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoffee, N. (2005). Myths of the Archaic State: Evolution and the Earliest Cities, States, and Civilizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Guillermo Algaze, James Chatters, Niles Eldredge, Stuart Fidel, Ian Kuijt, Anna Prentiss, Robert Graber, and Charles Spencer for taking the time to comment on earlier drafts of this article, sharing their expertise and their constructive criticisms with me, and generally acting as sounding boards for me as the ideas contained herein took shape. I would also like to thank the three reviewers, whose constructive criticisms greatly improved the presentation of those ideas.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Rosenberg .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rosenberg, M. (2009). Proximate Causation, Group Selection, and the Evolution of Hierarchical Human Societies: System, Process, and Pattern. In: Prentiss, A., Kuijt, I., Chatters, J. (eds) Macroevolution in Human Prehistory. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0682-3_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics