Advertisement

Microstructure–Property–Design Relationships in the Simulation Era: An Introduction

  • Dennis M. Dimiduk
Chapter

Abstract

Computational methods are affecting a paradigm change for using microstructure–property relationships within materials and structures engineering. This chapter examines the emergent use of quantitative computational tools for microstructure–property–design relationships, primarily for structural alloys. Three major phases are described as a historical “serial paradigm,” current “integrated computational materials engineering” and, future “virtual materials systems” emerging from advances in multiscale materials modeling. The latter two phases bring unique demands for integrating microstructure representations, constitutive descriptions, numerical codes, and experimental methods. Importantly, these approaches are forcing a fundamental restructuring of materials data for structural engineering wherein data centers on a hierarchy of model parameterizations and validations, rather than the current application-specific design limits. Examining aspects of current research on microstructure-sensitive design tools for single-crystal turbine blades provides an accessible glimpse into future computational tools and their data requirements. Finally, brief descriptions set context and interrelationships for the remaining chapters of the book.

Keywords

Turbine Blade Representative Volume Element Property Relationship Material Development Engineering Discipline 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

There are many incremental contributors to the viewpoints expressed both in this introduction and the throughout remainder of the book. Among those contributors, the author gratefully acknowledges important and formulating discussions with Profs. H.L. Fraser, S. Ghosh and J.C. Williams; and with Drs. R.E. Dutton, J.P. Simmons, C. Woodward, Dr. C. Hartley, M.G. Mendiratta, T.A. Parthasarathy, J.M. Larsen, L. Christodoulou, S. Wax, D. Backman, H.A. Lipsitt, M.J. Blackburn and Mr. J. Schirra. We alsogratefully acknowledge financial support from the Air Force Office of Scientific Research, under the direction of Dr. C. Hartley, and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, especially during early periods of this effort.

References

  1. Allison J, Li M, Wolverton C and Su X (2006) Virtual aluminum castings: an industrial application of ICME. JOM 58(11):28–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arakere NK and Swanson G (2002) Effect of crystal orientation on fatigue failure of single crystal nickel base turbine blade superalloys. J Eng Gas Turb Power, ASME 124:161–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnold SM (2006) Paradigm shift in data content and informatics infrastructure required for generalized constitutive modeling of materials behavior. MRS Bull 31:1013–1021.Google Scholar
  4. Asaro RJ (1983) Crystal plasticity. J Appl Mech 50:921–934.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. ASTM Std E1181-02 (2002) Standard test methods for characterizing duplex grain sizes. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.Google Scholar
  6. Backman DG, Wei DY, Whitis DD, Buczek MB, Finnigan PM and Gao D (2006) ICME at GE: accelerating the insertion of new materials and processes. JOM 58(11):36–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bernholc J (1999) Computational materials science: the era of applied quantum mechanics. Phys Today 52:30–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cahn RW (2001) The coming of materials science. Elsevier Science, Ltd., Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  9. Cebon D and Ashby MF (2006) Engineering materials informatics. MRS Bull 31:1004–1012.Google Scholar
  10. Cedar G (2000) Materials science needs and is getting quantitative methods. Phys Today 53:75–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Choi Y-S, Wen Y-H, Parthasarathy TA, Woodward C and Dimiduk DM (2009) A new microstructure-sensitive crystallographic constitutive model for creep of Ni-base single-crystal blade alloys. TMS Annual Meeting.Google Scholar
  12. Christodoulou L and Larsen JM (2004) Using materials prognosis to maximize the utilization potential of complex mechanical systems. JOM 55:15–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Christodoulou L Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) DARPA-AIM. http://www.darpa.mil/dso/thrusts/matdev/aim/index.html.
  14. Daw M and Baskes M (1984) Embedded-atom method: derivation and application to impurities, surfaces, and other defects in metals. Phys Rev B 29:6443–6453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. DEFORM (2009) http://www.deform.com
  16. Devincre B, Kubin L, Lemarch C and Madec R (2001) Mesoscopic simulations of plastic deformation. Mater Sci Eng A 309–310:211–219.Google Scholar
  17. Dimiduk DM, Martin PL and Dutton R (2003) Accelerated insertion of materials: the challenges of gamma alloys are really not unique. In: Kim Y-W, Clemens H and Rosenberger, A (eds) Gamma titanium aluminides, TMS, Warrendale, PA, 15–22.Google Scholar
  18. Dimiduk DM, Parathasarathy TA, Rao SI, Choi Y-S and Uchic MD (2004a) Predicting the microstructure-dependent mechanical performance of materials for early-stage design. In:Ghosh S, Castro JM and Lee JK (eds) Materials processing and design: modeling, simulation, and applications, NUMIFORM 2004, AIP CP712, American Institute of Physics, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1705.Google Scholar
  19. Dimiduk DM, Parthasarathy TA, Rao SI, Choi Y-S, Uchic MD, Woodward C and Simmons JP (2004b) Structural alloy performance prediction for accelerated use: evolving computational materials science & multiscale modeling. In: Ghoniem NM (ed) Conference proceedings of the second international conference on multiscale materials modeling, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 9–11.Google Scholar
  20. Dimiduk DM (2001) Gamma titanium-aluminide technology within the advanced propulsion community. In: Waltrup PF (ed) 15th International Symposium on Air Breathing Engines, Bangalore, India, 3–7 September, 2001, International Society for Air Breathing Engines (ISOBE) and American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA), Kansas City, MO, paper #1026.Google Scholar
  21. Dimiduk DM (1998) Systems engineering of gamma titanium aluminides: impact of fundamentals on development strategy. Intermetallics 6:613–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Epishin A, Link T, Brückner U, Fedelich B and Portella P (2004) Effects of segregation in nickel-base superalloys: dendritic stresses. In: Green KA, Pollock TM, Harada H, Howson TE, Reed RC, Schirra JJ and Walston S (eds) Superalloys 2004, Tenth International Symposium, TMS, Warrendale, PA, 537–543.Google Scholar
  23. Fraser HL Center for Accelerated Maturation of Materials (CAMM). http://www.camm.ohio-state.edu/index.html
  24. Ghoniem NM, Tong SH and Sun LZ (2000) Parametric dislocation dynamics: a thermodynamics-based approach to investigations of mesoscopic plastic deformation. Phys Rev B 61:913–927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ghosh S, Lee K and Raghavan P (2001) A multi-level computational model for multi-scale damage analysis in composite and porous materials. Int J Solids Struct 38:2335–2385.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ghosh S, Bai J and Raghavan P (2007) Concurrent multi-level model for damage evolution in microstructurally debonding composites. Mech Mater 39:241–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ghosh S, Dakshinamurthy V, Hu C and Bai J (2008) Multi-scale characterization and modeling of ductile failure in cast aluminum alloys. Int J Comp Meth Eng Sci Mech 9:1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Groeber M, Dimiduk DM, Uchic MD and Woodward C (2009) Integration of 3D structure information for a Ni-base superalloy into computational models for behavior prediction. TMS Annual Meeting.Google Scholar
  29. Hafner J (2000) Atomic-scale computational materials science. Acta Mater 48:71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Harrison GF, Tranter PH, Shepherd DP and Ward T (2004) Application of multi-scale modeling aeroengine component life assessment. Mater Sci Eng A 365:247–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Head AK, Humble P, Clarebrough LM, Morton AJ and Forwood CT (1973) Computed electron micrographs and defect identification. North Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  32. Kaufman L and Bernstein H (1970) Computer calculation of phase diagrams with special reference to refractory metals. In: Margrave JL (ed) Refractory materials: a series of monographs, Academic, New York.Google Scholar
  33. Kocks UF (1987) Constitutive behavior based on crystal plasticity. In: Miller AK (ed) Unified constitutive equations for plastic deformation and creep of engineering alloys, Elsevier, London, 1–88.Google Scholar
  34. Lipsitt HA, Blackburn MJ and Dimiduk DM (2001) High–temperature structural applications. In:Westbrook JH and Fleischer RL (eds) Intermetallic compounds principles and practice, Vol. 3, Wiley, New York, 471–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Liu L, Husseine NS, Torbet CJ, Kumah DP, Clarke R, Pollock TM and Jones J W (2008) In situ imaging of high cycle fatigue crack growth in single crystal nickel-base superalloys by synchrotron X-radiation. J Eng Mater Technol 130:021008–1–6.Google Scholar
  36. Liu Z-K, Chen L-Q and Rajan K (2006) Linking length scales via materials informatics. JOM 58(11):42–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ma A, Dye D and Reed RC (2008) A model for the creep deformation behaviour of single-crystals superalloy CMSX-4. Acta Mater 56:1657–1670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. MacKay RA and Maier RD (1982) The influence of orientation on the stress rupture properties of nickel base superalloy single crystals. Metall Trans 13A:1747–1754.Google Scholar
  39. MacLachlan DW, Wright LW, Gunturi S and Knowles DM (2001) Constitutive modeling of anisotropic creep deformation in single crystal blade alloys SRR99 and CMSX-4. Int J Plast 17:441–467.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mandel J (1973) Equations constitutives et directeurs dans les milieux plastiques et viscoplastiques. Int J Sol Struct 9:725–740.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McClung RC et al. (2008) Turbine Rotor Material Design, Phase 2 Final Report, Southwest Research Institute, University of Texas at San Antonio, Mustard Seed Software, GE Aviation, Honeywell, Pratt & Whitney, Rolls-Royce Corporation, FAA Grant 99-G-016, Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  42. McDowell DL (2000) Modeling and experiments in plasticity. Int J Solid Struct 37:293–309.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  43. Meric L, Pourbanne P and Cailletaud G (1991) Single crystal modeling for structural calculations: part 1-model presentation. J Eng Mater Tech 113:162–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Millwater HR and Osborn RW (2006) Probabilistic sensitivities for fatigue analysis on turbine engine disks. Int J Rotat Mach 28487:1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. National Materials Advisory Board (NMAB) (2004) Committee on Accelerating Technology Transition: Accelerating technology transition: bridging the valley of death for materials and processes in defense systems. National Academies Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  46. National Materials Advisory Board (NMAB) (2008) Committee on Integrated Computational Materials Engineering: integrated computational materials engineering a transformational discipline for improved competitiveness and national security. National Academies Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  47. Olson GB (1997) Computational design of hierarchically structured materials. Science 277:1237–1242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pollock TM and Tin S (2006) Nickel-based superalloys for advanced turbine engines: chemistry, microstructure, and properties. J Prop Power 22:361–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Reed RC (2006) The superalloys: fundamentals and applications, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shade PA (2008) Small scale mechanical testing techniques and application to evaluate a single crystal nickel superalloy. Ph.D. Thesis, The Ohio State University, 68–109.Google Scholar
  51. Shercliff HR and Ashby MF (1990) A process model for age hardening of Al alloys—part I. the model. Acta Metall 38:1789–1802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Simonovski I, Kovac M and Cizelj L (2004) Estimating the correlation length of inhomogeneities in a polycrystalline material. Mater Sci Eng A 381:273–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Smith CS (1988) A history of metallography. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  54. Swaminathan S and Ghosh S (2006) Statistically equivalent representative volume elements for composite microstructures, part II: with damage. J Compos Mater 7:605–621.Google Scholar
  55. Swaminathan S, Ghosh S and Pagano NJ (2006) Statistically equivalent representative volume elements for composite microstructures, part I: without damage. J Compos Mater 7:583–604.Google Scholar
  56. Tschopp MA, Spearot DE and McDowell DL (2008) Influence of grain boundary structure on dislocation nucleation in FCC metals. In: Hirth JP (ed) Dislocations in solids, Vol 14, Elsevier, Oxford, UK, 42–139.Google Scholar
  57. Uchic MD, Dimiduk DM, Wheeler R, Shade PA and Fraser HL (2006) Application of micro-sample testing to study fundamental aspects of plastic flow. Scripta Mater 54:759–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Valiveti DM and Ghosh S (2007) Morphology based domain partitioning of multi-phase materials: a preprocessor for multi-scale modeling. Int J Num Meth Eng 69:1717–1754.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  59. van de Walle A, Asta M and Ceder G (2002) The alloy theoretic automated toolkit: a user guide. CALPHAD 26:539–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Vitek V (1985) Effect of dislocation core structure on the plastic properties of metallic materials. In: Dislocations and properties of real materials, The Institute of Metals, London.Google Scholar
  61. Wikipedia Virtual Human (2009) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_,Physiological_Human, 31 March 2006.
  62. Yi JZ, Torbet CJ, Feng Q, Pollock TM and Jones JW (2007) Ultrasonic fatigue of single crystal Ni-base superalloy at 1000C. Mater Sci Eng A 443:142–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Yip S (2005) Handbook of materials modeling, Springer, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  64. Zhao JC (2006) Combinatorial approaches as effective tools in the study of phase diagrams and composition–structure–property relationships. Prog Mater Sci 51:557–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Materials and Manufacturing Directorate, Air Force Research LaboratoryWright-Patterson Air Force BaseDaytonUSA

Personalised recommendations