Memory Enhancement Strategies: What Works Best for Obtaining Memory Goals?
Adults of all ages experience difficulties remembering important information at times, and these difficulties occur more often as we grow older. Fortunately, a variety of easy-to-use strategies can be used to help people improve their learning and retention of a wide array of to-be-learned materials. In this chapter, we describe (a) many of these strategies, (b) why they work, and (c) how to apply basic principles of memory to adapt strategies to effectively learn and remember in novel contexts. Given that these strategies are often best suited for a single task or context, we also briefly discuss techniques that show promise for helping adults’ memory (and cognition) function effectively across many contexts.
KeywordsProspective Memory Implementation Intention Text Material External Reminder Prospective Memory Performance
This research was supported by a grant from the National Institute on Aging, one of the National Institutes of Health (R37 AG13148).
- Brush, J. A., & Camp, C. J. (1998). Spaced retrieval during dysphagia therapy: A case study. Clinical Gerontologist: The Journal of Aging and Mental Health, 19, 96–99.Google Scholar
- Camp, C. J., & Stevens, A. G. (1990). Spaced-retrieval: A memory intervention for dementia of the Alzheimer’s type. Clinical Gerontologist, 10, 58–61.Google Scholar
- Dixon, R. A., & de Frias, C. M. (2007). Mild memory deficits differentially affect 6-year changes in compensatory strategy use. Psychology & Aging, 3, 632–638.Google Scholar
- Einstein, G., & McDaniel, M. (2004). Memory fitness: A guide for successful aging. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Herrmann, D. J. (1987). Task appropriateness of mnemonic techniques. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 64, 171–178.Google Scholar
- Hertzog, C., Kramer, A. F., Wilson, R. S., & Lindenberger, U. (2009a). Enrichment effects on adult cognitive development: Can the functional capacity of older adults be preserved and enhanced? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9, 1–65.Google Scholar
- Hertzog, C., Kramer, A. F., Wilson, R. S., & Lindenberger, U. (2009b). Fit body, fit mind? Your workout makes you smarter. Scientific American, 20, 24–31.Google Scholar
- Hill, R. D., Stigstdotter Neely, A., & Bäckman, L. (2000). Cognitive Rehabilitation in Old Age. New York: NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Lövdén, M., Bäckman, L., Lindenberger, U., Schaefer, S., & Schmiedek, F. (2010). A theoretical framework for adult plasticity. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 659–676.Google Scholar
- Meyer, B. J. F., Young, C. J., & Bartlett, B. J. (1989). Memory improved: Reading and memory enhancement across the life span through strategic text structure. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Thöne-Otto, A. I., & Walther, K. (2009). Assessment and treatment of prospective memory disorders in clinical practice. In M. Kliegel, M. A. McDaniel, & G. Einstein (Eds.), Prospective memory: Cognitive, neuroscience, developmental, and applied perspectives (pp. 321–345). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Wallheim, C., Jacoby, L. L., & Dunlosky, J. (in press) Spacing enhances the learning of natural concepts: An investigation of mechanisms, metacognition, and aging. Memory & Cognition.Google Scholar
- Yates, F. A. (1966). The art of memory. Routledge and Kegan Paul: UK.Google Scholar