Advertisement

Tests and Contests

  • Fiona Walls
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter examines the use of speed and competition in the children’s mathematics classrooms. It reconstructs four classroom scenes to describe the devices teachers used including quick-fire questions, formal timed pencil-and-paper tests, children’s timed performances in front of the class and games where speed of answering produced winners and losers. The chapter uses archival material to show that speed and competition in mathematical learning are endorsed by syllabus materials and teaching resources, and demonstrates that the practices of the classroom are replicated in the home. The chapter demonstrates how the children were made within these discursive practices as performers and contestants. The children’s subjectivities were shaped around these subject positions as they were produced as winners or losers.

Keywords

Mathematics Education Basic Fact Mathematics Classroom Speed Test Time Table 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Anthony G, Knight G (1999) Teaching for understanding and memory in Year 4–5 mathematics. Ministry of Education, Wellington, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  2. Appelbaum P (1995) Popular culture, educational discourse and mathematics. State University of New York Press, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
  3. Atkinson S (1996) Developing a scheme of work for primary mathematics. Hodder & Stoughton, KentGoogle Scholar
  4. Beesey C, Davie L (1991) Macmillan mathematics series. Macmillan, Melbourne, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  5. Bibby T (2002) Primary school mathematics: an inside view. In Valero P, Skovsmose O (eds) Proceedings of the Third International Mathematics Education and Society Conference, part 1, pp 165–172Google Scholar
  6. Bishop A (1991) Mathematical enculturation: a cultural perspective on mathematics education. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  7. Boaler J (1997b) Setting, social class and the survival of the quickest. Br Educ J 23(5):575–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burn M (1968) Numbers and shapes – quick book 1. Ginn & Co, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Carpenter T, Fennema E, Loef Framke M, Levi L, Empson S (1999) Children’s mathematics: cognitively guided instruction. Heinemann, Portsmouth, NHGoogle Scholar
  10. Cotton T, Hardy T (2004) Problematising culture and discourse for mathematics education research. In Valero P, Zevenbergen R (eds) Researching the socio-political dimensions of mathematics education: issues of power in theory and methodology. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 85–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davis B (1996) Teaching mathematics: toward a sound alternative. Garland, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Flockton L, Crooks T (1998) Mathematics: assessment results 1997. National education monitoring report 9. Educational Assessment Research Unit, University of Otago, Dunedin, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  13. McKay J (1991) No pain, no gain?: sport and Australian culture. Prentice Hall, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  14. Nuthall G (2000) How children remember what they learn in school. New Zealand Council for Educational Research, WellingtonGoogle Scholar
  15. Thorndike E (1922) The psychology of arithmetic. Macmillan, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wheat H (1937) The psychology and teaching of arithmetic. Heath & Company, Boston, DCGoogle Scholar
  17. Ministry of Education (1992) Mathematics in the New Zealand Curriculum. Learning Media, Wellington, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  18. Ministry of Education (1997) Developing mathematics programmes. Learning Media, Wellington, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  19. Ministry of Education (1999a) Figure it out (levels 2/3) Learning Media, Wellington, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  20. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000) Principles and standards for school mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VAGoogle Scholar
  21. National Mathematics Advisory Panel (2008) Foundations for success: the final report of the Mathematics Advisory Panel. U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.James Cook UniversityTownsvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations