Of Subjects, Subjectivity, and Subjectification: Subjects Made Visible



This chapter outlines the theoretical framework used in the book. It looks at the concept of “subject” used by Foucault as a way of describing an individual in society. Foucault talked of his academic work as centering around the idea of how subjects are made in interaction with others. The chapter provides examples of research that have used this idea in mathematics education and elsewhere. The chapter then explores the related idea of subjectivity as something that a subject does – explaining the difference between this and the more popularly recognized concept of identity which is seen as fixed – something one has. The chapter then describes Foucault’s concept of subjectification as a process of subjects making themselves accountable to discourses which recognise and make them visible. Finally, the chapter looks at Foucault’s view of discourse – the things we say and the practices such saying allows – as the means by which subjects, subjectivity, and subjectification are made.


Mathematics Education National Curriculum Subject Position Time Table Discursive Formation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Bergström O, Knights D (2006) Organizational discourse and subjectivity: subjectification during processes of recruitment. Hum Relat 59(3):351–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown T, Jones L, Bibby T (2004) Identifying with mathematics in initial teacher training. In Walshaw M (ed) Mathematics education within the postmodern. Information Age, Charlotte, NC, pp 161–180Google Scholar
  3. Côte JE, Levine CG (2002) Identity formation, agency and culture: a social psychological synthesis. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJGoogle Scholar
  4. Davies B (1993) Shards of glass: children reading and writing beyond gendered identities. Allen & Unwin, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  5. Ernest P (1998) Social constructivism as a philosophy of mathematics. State University of New York Press, Albany, NYGoogle Scholar
  6. Foucault M (1970) The order of things: an archaeology of the human sciences. Vintage, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Foucault M (1972) The archaeology of knowledge. Penguin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Foucault M (1977) Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. Penguin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Foucault M (1978) The will to knowledge: the history of sexuality, vol 1. Penguin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Foucault M (1980) Power/knowledge. Harvester, BrightonGoogle Scholar
  11. Grootenboer P, Lowrie T, & Smith T (2006) Researching identity in mathematics education: The lay of the land. In P. Grootenboer, R. Zevenbergen, & M. Chinnappan (Eds.) Identities, cultures and learning spaces (Proceedings of the 29th annual conference of Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Vol. 2, pp. 612–615). Canberra, Australia: MERGAGoogle Scholar
  12. Grootenboer P, Zevenbergen R (2008) Identity as a lens to understand learning mathematics: developing a model. In Goos M, Brown R, Makar K (eds) Navigating currents and charting directions. Proceedings of the Thirty-first Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, pp 243–249Google Scholar
  13. Hardy T (2004) “There’s no hiding place”: Foucault’s notion of normalization at work in a ­mathematics lesson. In: Walshaw M (ed.) Mathematics education within the postmodern. Information Age: Greenwich, CT, pp 103–120Google Scholar
  14. Holland D, Lachicotte W, Skinner D, Cain C (1998) Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  15. Kendall G, Wickham G (1999) Using Foucault’s methods. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. Lacan J (1977) The four fundamental concepts of psychoanalysis. The Hogarth Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Mendick H (2006) Masculinities in mathematics. Open University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. Miller Marsh M (2002) Examining the discourses that shape our teacher identities. Curriculum Inquiry 32(4):453–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Reay D, Wiliam D (1999) ‘I’ll be a nothing’: structure, agency and the construction of identity through assessment. Br Educ Res J 25(3):343–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Venn C (2002) Refiguring subjectivity after modernity. In: Walkerdine V (ed) Challenging subjects: critical psychology for a new millennium. Palgrave, New York, pp 5171Google Scholar
  21. Walkerdine V (1988) The mastery of reason. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Walkerdine V (2002) Introduction. In: Walkerdine V (ed) Challenging subjects: critical psychology for a new millennium. Palgrave, New York, pp 1–3Google Scholar
  23. Walshaw M (2007) Working with Foucault in education. Sense, RotterdamGoogle Scholar
  24. Winbourne P (1999) Mathematical Becoming: The place of mathematics in the unfolding stories of learners’ identities. In O. Zaslavsky (ed), Proceedings of the 23rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Vol 1, Haifa, IsraelGoogle Scholar
  25. Foucault M (1994a) The subject and power. In Faubion J (ed) Power: essential works of Foucault 1954–1982. Penguin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. Henriques J, Holloway W, Urwin C, Venn C, Walkerdine V (1998) Changing the subject: psychology, social regulation and subjectivity. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  27. Lacan J (2002) Ecrits: a selection. W.W Norton & Co, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.James Cook UniversityTownsvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations