Single Shoes and Individual Lives: The Mill Creek Shoe Project



Shoes are compelling symbols of individual lives and act metaphorically to suggest an intimacy with the person who wore them. In our modern world, celebrity affiliation with specific shoe designers – e.g., Sarah Jessica Parker and Manolo Blahnik – underscores the intimacy of this kind of artifact. In Anna Karenina, Tolstoy wrote, “Now she knew all of them as people know one another in a country town; she knew their habits and weaknesses, and where the shoe pinched each one of them.” The fit of a shoe is intimate information, and possessing knowledge of it suggests extraordinary familiarity. Maxims regarding the intimacy of shoes abound in modern parlance: “If the shoe fits, wear it,” “Walk a mile in someone else’s shoes.” As artifacts, shoes carry the marks of the individual who wore them in many different ways, physically as well as symbolically.


Individual Life Hallux Valgus Late Eighteenth Wear Pattern Individual People 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The Mill Creek Project was initially launched under the direction of The Center for Cultural and Environmental History and The Andrew Fiske Memorial Center for Archaeological Research, Anthropology Department, at the University of Massachusetts, Boston, MA. Thanks to David Landon, Dennis Peichota, and Leith Smith for inviting me to participate in the project and for permitting my ongoing access to these materials. Thank you to Rebecca Yamin for her comments on this paper as presented in the 2006 symposium at the Society for Historical Archaeology Conference, Sacramento, California.


  1. Anderson, A., 1968, The Archaeology of Mass-Produced Footwear. Historical Archaeology 2: 56–65.Google Scholar
  2. Butterworth, J. A., 1998, Forming the Past. Historical Archaeology 32(3): 91–98.Google Scholar
  3. Comaroff, J. and Comaroff, J., 1992, Ethnography and the Historical Imagination. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
  4. Copeland, P. F., 1977, Working Dress in Colonial and Revolutionary America. Greenwood Press, Westport, CT.Google Scholar
  5. Davis, H. B., 1940, Shoes: The Workers and the Industry. International Publishers, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Frank, G. 1995, Anthropology and Individual Lives: The Story of the Life History and the History of the Life Story. American Anthropologist 97(1): 145–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gannon, F. A. 1912, A Short History of American Shoemaking. Newcomb & Gauss, Salem, MA.Google Scholar
  8. Gilchrist, R., 2005, Introduction: Scales and Voices in World Historical Archaeology. World Archaeology 37(3): 329–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gosden, C. and Marshall, Y., 1999, The Cultural Biography of Objects. World Archaeology 31(2): 169–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goubitz, O. and Groenman-Van Waateringe. W., 2001, Stepping through Time: Archaeological Footwear from Prehistoric Times Until 1800. Stichting Promotie Archeologie, ZwoIIe Netherlands.Google Scholar
  11. Grew, F. and de Neergaard, M., 2001, Shoes and Pattens. Medieval Finds from Excavations in London: 2. Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, London.Google Scholar
  12. Grimm, J. L., 1970, Archaeological Investigation of Fort Ligonier 1960–1965. Annals of the Carnegie Museum 42. Carnegie Institute, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
  13. Harré, R. 1998, The Singular Self: An Introduction to the Psychology of Personhood. Sage, London.Google Scholar
  14. Hazard, B. E., 1921 [1969], The Organization of the Boot and Shoe Industry in Massachusetts Before 1875. Augustus M. Kelley, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Hoskins, J., 1998, Biographical Objects: How Things Tell the Stories of People’s Lives. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  16. Huddleson, J. E. and Watanabe, M. S. 1990. Pegged Footwear from San Francisco. Historical Archaeology Special Publication 7: 94–100.Google Scholar
  17. Ingold, T., 2004, Culture on the Ground: The World Perceived through the Feet. Journal of Material Culture 9(3): 315–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Joyce, R. and Claassen, C., 1997, Women in the Ancient Americas: Archaeologists, Gender, and the Making of Prehistory. In Women in Prehistory: North America and Mesoamerica, edited by C. Claassen & R. A. Joyce, pp. 1–14. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  19. Kopytoff, I., 1986, The Cultural Biography of Things: Commoditization as Process. In The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective, edited by A. Appadurai, pp. 64–91. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  20. Meskell, L. 1999. Archaeologies of Social Life: Age, Sex, Class et cetera in Ancient Egypt. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  21. Pratt, L. and Woolley, L., 1999, Shoes. V&A Publications, London.Google Scholar
  22. Rexford, N. E., 2000, Women’s Shoes in America, 1795–1930. Kent State University Press, OH.Google Scholar
  23. Seasholes, N., 2004. History of the Mill Creek. Manuscript on file at the The Andrew Fiske Memorial Center for Archaeological Research, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  24. Stevens, S. C. and Ordoñez, M. T., 2005, Shoes from a Nineteenth-Century Boston Privy. Historical Archaeology 39(4): 9–25.Google Scholar
  25. Swallow, A. W., 1975, Interpretation of Wear Marks Seen in Footwear. Trans Museum Assist Group (12): 28–32.Google Scholar
  26. Swann, J., 1982, Shoes. Drama Book Publishers, New York.Google Scholar
  27. Trinkhaus, E., 2005, Anatomical Evidence for the Antiquity of Human Footwear Use. Journal of Archaeological Science 32: 1515–1526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Vass, L. and Molnár, M., 1999, Handmade Shoes for Men. Konemann, Cologne.Google Scholar
  29. White, C. L., 2004a, The Mill Creek Shoe Project: Investigating Footwear of 18th- and 19th-Century Boston. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Council for Northeast Historical Archaeology, Kingston, Ontario.Google Scholar
  30. White, C. L., 2004b, The Mill Creek Leather Artifact Assemblage. Report submitted to the Center for Cultural and Environmental History and The Andrew Fiske Memorial Center for Archaeological Research, Anthropology Department at the University of Massachusetts, Boston, MA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of Nevada, RenoRenoUSA

Personalised recommendations