Introduction: Objects, Scale, and Identity Entangled

  • Carolyn L. White


Three elements – objects, scale, and identity – are entangled in the chapters in this collection. The authors have been tasked to center both material culture and the scale of the individual in their interpretations of the archaeological record. Archaeologists have always prioritized material things in the study of the past; the artifact is central to the archaeological endeavor. Nonetheless, as a number of scholars have recently pointed out (Meskell, 2005; Cochran and Beaudry, 2006; Loren and Beaudry, 2006), interpretive approaches to materiality – those that take an interdisciplinary perspective on material culture and also employ an approach developed in anthropological material studies – have been slow to percolate into the collective archaeological perspective. There are now a number of encouraging developments in this regard that indicate a new intensity of interest in material culture studies with a distinctly archaeological approach (Beaudry, 2006; White, 2005; Meskell, 2005), including a new series of guides published by Left Coast Press (White and Scarlett, 2009). One of the major aims of this volume is to demonstrate the potential of an approach to the archaeological record that takes materiality as its focus and uses substantive case studies to explore a common theme: individuality.


Archaeological Site Material Culture Archaeological Record Individual Life Historical Archaeology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Appadurai, A., 1986, Introduction: Commodities and the Politics of Value. In The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective, edited by A. Appadurai, pp. 3–63. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  2. Baxter, J.E., 2005, The Archaeology Of Childhood: Children, Gender, and Material Culture. AltaMira, Lanham, MD.Google Scholar
  3. Beaudry, M.C., 2006, Findings: The Material Culture of Needlework and Sewing. Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  4. Beaudry, M.C., Cook, L.J., and Mrozowski, S.A., 1991, Artifacts and Active Voices: Material Culture as Social Discourse. In The Archaeology of Inequality, edited by R.H. McGuire and R. Paynter, pp. 150–191. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  5. Brumfiel, E., 1992, Distinguished Lecture in Archeology: Breaking and Entering the Ecosystem – Gender, Class, and Faction Steal the Show. American Anthropologist 94(3):551–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Casella, E., 2000, “Doing Trade”: A Sexual Economy of 19th Century Australian Female Convict Prisons. World Archaeology 32(2):209–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Casella, E.C., and Fowler, C., 2005, The Archaeology of Plural and Changing Identities: Beyond Identification. Kluwer/Plenum, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cochran, M.D., and Beaudry, M.C., 2006, Material Culture Studies and Historical Archaeology, In The Cambridge Companion to Historical Archaeology, edited by D. Hicks and M.C. Beaudry, pp. 191–204. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  9. Dawdy, S., 2008, Building the Devil’s Empire: French Colonial New Orleans. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  10. DeCunzo, L.A., and Ernstein, J.H., 2006, Landscapes, Ideology and Experience. In The Cambridge Companion to Historical Archaeology, edited by D. Hicks and M.C. Beaudry, pp. 191–204. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  11. Deetz, J., 1977, In Small Things Forgotten: The Archaeology of Early American Life. Anchor, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Delle, J.A., Mrozowski, S.A., and Paynter, R., eds., 2000, Lines that Divide: Historical Archaeologies of Race, Class, and Gender. University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville.Google Scholar
  13. Ferguson, L., 1992, Uncommon Ground: Archaeology and Early African America, 1650–1800. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  14. Fisher, G., and Loren, D.D., 2003, Embodying Identity in Archaeology. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 13(2):225–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Frank, G., 1995, Anthropology and Individual Lives: The Story of the Life History and the History of the Life Story. American Anthropologist 97(1):145–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Galle, J.E., and Young, A.L., 2005, Engendering African American Archaeology: A Southern Perspective. University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville.Google Scholar
  17. Gell, A., 1998, Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  18. Gilchrist, R., 2005, Introduction: Scales and Voices in World Historical Archaeology. World Archaeology 37(3):329–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gosden, C., and Marshall Y., 1999, The Cultural Biography of Objects. World Archaeology 31(2):169–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hall, M., and Silliman, S.W., 2006, Historical Archaeology. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  21. Hamilakis, Y., Pluciennik, M., and Tarlow, S., eds., 1998, Thinking Through the Body: Archaeologies of Corporeality. Kluwer/Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Hardesty, D.H., 1994, Class, Gender Strategies, and Material Culture in the Mining West. In Those of Little Note: Gender, Race, and Class in Historical Archaeology, edited by E.M. Scott, pp. 129–138. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
  23. Hoskins, J., 1998, Biographical Objects: How Things Tell the Story of People’s Lives. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  24. Joyce, R., 2006, Writing Historical Archaeology. In The Cambridge Companion to Historical Archaeology, edited by D. Hicks and M.C. Beaudry, pp. 48–68. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  25. Joyce, R., and Claassen, C., 1997, Women in the Ancient Americas: Archaeologists, Gender, and the Making of Prehistory. In Women in Prehistory: North America and Mesoamerica, edited by C. Claassen and R.A. Joyce, pp. 1–14. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  26. King, J.A., 2006, Household Archaeology, Identities and Biographies. In The Cambridge Companion to Historical Archaeology, edited by D. Hicks and M.C. Beaudry, pp. 293–313. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  27. Leone, M., 1984, Interpreting Ideology in Historical Archaeology: Using the Rules of Perspective in the William Paca Garden in Annapolis, Maryland. In Ideology, Power and Prehistory, edited by D. Miller and C. Tilley, pp. 25–35. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  28. Leone, M., 2005, The Archaeology of Liberty in an American Capital: Excavations in Annapolis. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
  29. Lindman, J.M., and Tarter, M.L., eds., 2001, A Centre of Wonders: The Body in Early America. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
  30. Loren, D.D., and Beaudry, M.C., 2006, Becoming American: Small Things Remembered. In Historical Archaeology, edited by M. Hall and S.W. Silliman, pp. 251–271. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  31. McGuire, R.H., and Paynter, R., eds., 1991, The Archaeology of Inequality. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  32. Meskell, L., 1999, Archaeologies of Social Life: Age, Sex, Class et cetera in Ancient Egypt, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  33. Meskell, L., ed., 2005, Archaeologies of Materiality. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  34. Montserrat, D., ed., 1998, Changing Bodies, Changing Meanings: Studies of the Body in Antiquity. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  35. Muller, N.L., 1994, The House of the Black Burghardts: An Investigation of Race, Gender, and Class at the W.E.B. Du Bois Boyhood Homesite. In Those of Little Note: Gender, Race, and Class in Historical Archaeology, edited by E.M. Scott, pp. 81–96. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
  36. Noël Hume, I., 1982, Martin’s Hundred: The Discovery of a Lost Colonial Virginia Settlement. Knopf, New York.Google Scholar
  37. Orser, C.E., ed., 2001, Race and the Archaeology of Identity. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
  38. Paynter, R., 2000, Historical Archaeology and the Post-Columbian World of North America. Journal of Archaeological Research 8:169–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pluciennik, M., 1999, Archaeological Narratives and Other Ways of Telling. Current Anthropology 40(5):653–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Praetzellis, A., and Praetzellis, M., eds., 1998, Archaeologists as Storytellers (special issue). Historical Archaeology 32(1).Google Scholar
  41. Rautman, A.E., ed., 2000, Reading the Body: Representations and Remains in the Archaeological Record. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  42. Saitta, D., 2007, The Archaeology of Collective Action. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
  43. Samford, P., 1996, The Archaeology of African-American Slavery and Material Culture. The William and Mary Quarterly 53(1):87–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schmidt, R.A., and Voss, B.L., 2000, Archaeologies of Sexuality, Routledge, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  45. Scott, E.M., ed., 1994, Those of Little Note: Gender, Race, and Class in Historical Archaeology. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
  46. Seifert, D.J., ed., 1991a, Gender in Historical Archaeology (special issue). Historical Archaeology 25(4).Google Scholar
  47. Seifert, D.J., ed., 1991b, Within Sight of the White House: The Archaeology of Working Women. Historical Archaeology 25(4):82–107.Google Scholar
  48. Seifert, D.J., ed., 1994, Mrs. Starr’s Profession. In Those of Little Note: Gender, Race, and Class in Historical Archaeology, edited by E.M. Scott, pp. 149–173. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
  49. Silliman, S., 2006, Struggling with Labor, Working with Identities. In Historical Archaeology, edited by Martin Hall and Stephen Silliman, pp. 147–166. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  50. Strathern, M., 1988, The Gender of the Gift. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  51. Thomas, N., 1991, Entangled Objects: Exchange, Material Culture, and Colonialism in the Pacific. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  52. Voss, B., 2005, Sexual Subjects: Identity and Taxonomy in Archaeological Research. In The Archaeology of Plural and Changing Identities: Beyond Identification, edited by E.C. Casella and C. Fowler, pp. 55–78. Kluwer/Plenum, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Voss, B., 2006, Engendered Archaeology. In Historical Archaeology, edited by M. Hall and S.W. Silliman, pp. 107–127. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  54. Wall, D.DiZ. 1994, The Archaeology of Gender: Separating the Spheres in Urban America. Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
  55. White, C.L., 2005, American Artifacts of Personal Adornment, 1680–1820: A Guide to Identification and Interpretation. AltaMira, Lanham, MD.Google Scholar
  56. White, C.L., 2008, Personal Adornment and Interlaced Identities at the Sherburne Site, Portsmouth, New Hampshire. Historical Archaeology 42(2):17–37.Google Scholar
  57. White, C.L., 2009, Beholden to foreing countries: Trade and Clothing in Portsmouth, New Hampshire. In Trade and Exchange: Archaeological Studies from History and Prehistory. Springer Press, New York.Google Scholar
  58. White, C.L., and Beaudry, M.C., 2009, Artifacts and Personal Identity. In International Handbook of Historical Archaeology, edited by T. Majewski and D. Gaimster, Springer, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  59. White, C.L., and Scarlett, T., series eds., 2009, Guides to Historical Artifacts Series. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, CA. [Forthcoming.]Google Scholar
  60. Wilkie, L.A., 2003, The Archaeology of Mothering: An African-American Midwife’s Tale. Routledge, London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Nevada-RenoRenoUSA

Personalised recommendations