Skip to main content

Mobile Robotic Surveying Performance for Planetary Surface Site Characterization

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking of Intelligent Systems

Abstract

Robotic systems will perform mobile surveys for scientific and engineering purposes as part of future missions on lunar and planetary surfaces. With site characterization as a task objective various system configurations and surveying techniques are possible. This chapter describes several examples of mobile surveying approaches using local and remote sensing configurations. A geometric measure of area coverage performance is applied to each and relative performance in surveying a common area is characterized by expected performance trends. Performance metrics that solely express geometric aspects of the robotic task are limited in utility as decision aids to human mission operators. As such, the importance of enriching such metrics by incorporating additional attributes germane to surveying on planetary surfaces is highlighted. Examples of enriched metrics employed by recent NASA research work on human-supervised robotic surveying are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Garcia E, Gonzalez de Santos P (2004) Mobile-robot navigation with complete coverage of unstructured environments. Rob Auton Syst 46:195–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wong SC, Middleton L, MacDonald BA (2002) Performance metrics for robot coverage tasks. In: Proceedings of the Australasian Conference on Robot and Automation, Auckland, New Zealand, pp. 7–12.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mei Y, Lu Y-H, Hu YC, Lee CSG (2006) Deployment of mobile robots with energy and timing constraints. IEEE Trans Robot 22(3):507–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fong T, Bualat M, Edwards L, Fluckiger L et al. (2006) Human-robot site survey and sampling for space exploration. In: Proceedings of the AIAA Space Conference, San Jose, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carpin S, Pillonetto G (2003) Robot motion planning using adaptive random walks. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Taipei, Taiwan, pp. 3809–3814.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nakamura Y, Sekiguchi A (2001) The chaotic mobile robot. IEEE Trans Robot Autom 17(6):898–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tunstel E, Anderson G, Wilson E (2007) Autonomous mobile surveying for science rovers using in situ distributed remote sensing. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Montreal, pp. 2348–2353.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Anderson GT, Hashemi RR, Wilson E, Clark M (2000) Application of cooperative robots to search for water on Mars using distributed spectroscopy. In: Proceedings of International Symposium on Robotics and Applications WAC, Maui, HI.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Schmitt HH, Kulcinski GL, Sviatoslavsky IN, Carrier III WD (1992) Spiral mining for lunar volatiles. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Engineering, Construction and Operations in Space III, Denver, CO, pp. 1162–1170.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fong T, Allen M, Bouyssounouse X, Bualat MG et al. (2008) Robotic site survey at Haughton Crater. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and Automation in Space, Los Angeles, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Elfes A, Dolan J, Podnar G, Mau S, Bergerman M (2006) Safe and efficient robotic space exploration with tele-supervised autonomous robots. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium, Stanford, CA, pp. 104–113.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hashemi RR, Jin L, Anderson GT, Wilson E, Clark M (2001) A comparison of search patterns for cooperative robots operating in remote environments. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Information Technology: Computing and Coding, Las Vegas, NV, pp. 668–672.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wilson EW, Tunstel EW, Anderson GT (2007) BioGAS spectrometer for biogenic gas detection and location on the surface of Mars. In: Proceedings of the AIAA Infotech@Aerosp Conference and Exhibition, Rohnert Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hashmonay RA, Yost, MG (1999) Innovative approach for estimating fugitive gaseous fluxes using computed tomography and remote optical sensing techniques. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 49(8):966–972.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mei Y, Lu Y-H, Hu YC, Lee CSG (2004) Energy-efficient motion planning for mobile robots. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, New Orleans, LA, pp. 4344–4349.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shillcutt KJ (2000) Solar based navigation for robotic explorers. Doctoral Thesis, Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, CMU-RI-TR-00-25.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tunstel E (2007) Operational performance metrics for Mars Exploration Rovers. J Field Robot 24(8–9):651–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sukhatme GS, Bekey GA (1996) Multicriteria evaluation of a planetary rover. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Minneapolis, MN.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schreckenghost D, Fong T, Milam T (2008) Human supervision of robotic site surveys. In: Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Human/Robotic Technology and Vision for Space Exploration, STAIF, Albuquerque, NM.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schreckenghost D, Fong T, Milam T, Pacis E, Utz H (2009) Real-time assessment of robot performance during remote exploration operations. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, MT.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gernhardt M (2005) Work efficiency indices. Presentation at NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Arnold J (2006) Towards a framework for architecting heterogeneous teams of humans and robots for space exploration. MS Thesis, Department Aeronaut & Astronaut, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fong T, Bualat M, Deans M et al. (2008) Field testing of utility robots for lunar surface operations. In: Proceedings of the AIAA Space Conference, San Diego, CA, AIAA-2008-7886.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Hans Utz, Tod Milam, David Lees, and Matt Deans for assisting with the development and implementation of real-time robot performance monitoring.

This work was partially supported by the NASA Astrobiology Science and Technology Instrument Development program, the NASA Exploration Systems Technology Development Program under the “Human-Robotic Systems” project and the NASA Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR) program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward Tunstel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tunstel, E., Dolan, J.M., Fong, T., Schreckenghost, D. (2009). Mobile Robotic Surveying Performance for Planetary Surface Site Characterization. In: Madhavan, R., Tunstel, E., Messina, E. (eds) Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking of Intelligent Systems. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0492-8_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0492-8_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-0491-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-0492-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics