Advertisement

Topophilia: A Tool for the Demarcation of Cultural Microregions: The Case of the Huaxteca

  • Lorenzo Ochoa
Chapter

Abstract

It is a real shame that Boehm’s description is only a fictional recreation of an episode from Mexica’s conquest of Huaxteca. It gives us an account of the ample variety of food products that Huaxtec offered their conquerors and how this was recorded in some historical sources (Durán 1995 [1580]:Chap. XIX; Alvarado Tezozómoc 2001 [1598–1609]:Chap. XXI). If a narrative scene such as this is not found verbatim in the chronicles from the sixteenth century, Boehm’s recreation does not depart too radically from the actual food products that the Huaxtec offered the Mexicans as payment after their conquest. And although historic reality does not play out exactly as in Boehm’s imagination, her interpretation and the data recorded in the historical sources prompted me to propose this research paper. Further, two other reasons encouraged me to begin this project. The first was having found in Don Carlos de Tapia Zenteno’s (1767) linguistic analysis of Huaxtec vocabulary the first clues to begin considering the characteristics of some foods that he mentions; or, in any case, of ingredients used in Huaxtec cooking. Second, given the lack of information on the subject of foodstuffs in connection with this culture, I deemed it relevant to call attention to this particular issue. Due to these limitations, I tried to approach the subject with the utmost caution, given that the foods that Tapia Zenteno mentions, directly or indirectly, exist in a geographically restricted area. For the purposes of this work I have circumscribed the aforementioned area to a landscape of rivers, lagoons, and mangrove swamps (Fig. 1).1 This information is complemented by my ethnographical notes. In order to carry out this work, I attempt an approach borrowed from geography: topophilia. According to Yi-Fu Tuan “topophilia is the affective bond between people and place sentence or setting. Diffuse as concept, vivid and concrete as personal experience…” (Tuan, 1990 [1974]:4), I will address this concept later on. What is important is that I find it can be exemplified by south Huaxtec regional cooking; although it is also possible to use this approach in other cultural situations.

Keywords

Gulf Coast Historical Source Geographical Environment Mangrove Swamp Maize Flour 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The approach of this paper comes from the suggestions of Gonzalo Camacho who first spoke to me about Topophilia. The readings and comments made by Joyce Marcus, Ana Bella Pérez Castro, and Luis Vargas, as well as those of the members of the Permanent Seminar of Huaxtec Studies that I coordinate at the Institute of Anthropological Investigations of the UNAM in Mexico City, were of crucial importance to the development of this text. I would like to acknowledge the aid of Eladio Terreros who selected the images. Finally, I would like to extend my appreciation to Antonio Ochoa who carefully thought of the best way to translate my baroque writing style into English.

References

  1. Alcorn, J. B. (1984). Huastec Mayan Ethnobotany. University of Texas: Austin.Google Scholar
  2. Alcorn, Janis B., Edmonson, B. and Hernández Vidales, C. (2006). Thipaak and the Origins of maize in Northern Mesoamerica. In Histories of Maize: Multidisciplinary Approaches, to the Prehistory, Linguistics, Biogeography, Domestication, and Evolution of Maize edited by John E. Staller, Robert H. Tykot and Bruce Benz., pp. 599–609. Elsevier/Academic Press. Amsterdam; Boston. Google Scholar
  3. Alvarado Tezozómoc, H. de (2001). Crónica Mexicana, edited by Gonzalo Díaz Migoyo and Germán Vázquez Chamorro. Dastin, Madrid.Google Scholar
  4. Boehnm de Lameiras, B. (1996). ¡Ea michoacanos!. In Michoacán a la mesa., edited by Luis González, pp. 13–18. El Colegio de Michoacán, Instituto de Investigaciones Históricas, Gobierno del Estado de Michoacán.Google Scholar
  5. Códice Chimalpopoca (1992). Anales de Cuauhtitlán y Leyenda de los Soles, tr. De Primo Feliciano Velázquez. Instituto de Investigaciones Históricas, UNAM: Mexico.Google Scholar
  6. Durán, f. D. (1995). Historia de las Indias de Nueva España e Islas de Tierra Firme (2 vols.), preliminary study by Rosa Camelo and José Rubén Romero. Consejo Nacional para la Cultura y las Artes (Cien de méxico), Mexico.Google Scholar
  7. Giménez Montiel, G. (2005). Teoría y análisis de la cultura (vol. 1). Consejo Nacional para la Cultura y las Artes, Mexico.Google Scholar
  8. Grave Tirado, A. (2003). La región fundada en la tradición: El norte de Nayarit y el sur de Sinaloa, una región a lo largo del tiempo. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, UNAM (Tesis de Maestría en Estudios Mesoamericanos), Mexico.Google Scholar
  9. Hernández Ferrer, M. (2000). Ofrendas a Dhipak: Ritos agrícolas entre los teenek de San Luis Potosí. Escuela Nacional de Antropología e Historia (Tesis de licenciatura), México.Google Scholar
  10. Mintz, S. W. (2003). Sabor a comida, sabor a libertad. Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios Superiores en Antropología Social-Ediciones de la reina roja-Consejo Nacional para la Cultura y las Artes: Mexico.Google Scholar
  11. Ochoa, L. (2005). Reseña del volumen Tamtok. Sitio arqueológico huasteco. Volumen II, su vida cotidiana. Anales de Antropología, 39(3): 282–292. Mexico.Google Scholar
  12. Ochoa, L. (2007). Dioses de ayer y hoy entre los huaxtecos: notas para su estudio. In Equilibrio, intercambio y reciprocidad: principio de vida y sentidos de muerte en la Huasteca, coordinated by Ana Bella Pérez Castro, pp. 17–32. Consejo Veracruzano de Arte Popular: Xalapa, Mexico.Google Scholar
  13. Ochoa, L. and Gutiérrez, G. (1996-1999). Notas en torno a la cosmovisión y religión de los ­huaxtecos. Anales de Antropología, 33: 91–163. Mexico.Google Scholar
  14. Ochoa, L. and Jaime Riverón, O. (2000). Un paseo por el Parque-Museo de La Venta, Consejo Nacional para la Cultura y las Artes: Gobierno del Estado de Tabasco, Mexico.Google Scholar
  15. Ochoa, L. and Jaime Riverón, O. (2005). The Cultural Mosaic of the Gulf Coast during the Pre-Hispanic Period. In Native peoples of the Gulf Coast of Mexico, edited by Alan R. Sandstrom and Hugo García Valencia, pp. 22-44. The University of Arizona Press: Arizona.Google Scholar
  16. Pagán Jiménez, J. (2002). El concepto ‘paisaje’ como traslación de ‘landscape’ en arqueología. Diálogo Antropológico 1: 7-12. Mexico.Google Scholar
  17. Sahagún, F. B. de (2002). Historia general de las cosas de Nueva España, introductory study, paleography, glossary and notes by Alfredo López Austin and Josefina García Quintana, Consejo Nacional para la Cultura y las Artes, Mexico.Google Scholar
  18. Santamaría, F. J. (1974). Diccionario de mejicanismos. Editorial Porrúa: Mexico.Google Scholar
  19. Tapia Zenteno, C. (1767). Noticia de la lengua huasteca. Imprenta de la Bibliotheca Mexicana: Mexico.Google Scholar
  20. Torquemada, F. J. de (1976). Monarquía Indiana (vol. 3), edited by Miguel León Portilla (7 vols.). Instituto de Investigaciones Históricas, UNAM: Mexico.Google Scholar
  21. Tuan, Yi-Fu (1972: 534-540 [1961]). Topophilia: personal encounters with the landscape. In Man, Space and Environment, edited by Paul Ward English and Robert C. Mayfield, pp. 534-540. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  22. Tuan, Yi-Fu (1990 [1974]). Topophilia: A study of enviromental perception, attitudes, and values. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lorenzo Ochoa
    • 1
  1. 1.Instituto de Investigaciones AntropológicasUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoMéxico CityMéxico

Personalised recommendations