Abstract
The deformation and failure response of composite sandwich beams and panels under low velocity impact was reviewed and discussed. Sandwich facesheet materials discussed are unidirectional and woven carbon/epoxy, and woven glass/vinylester composite laminates; sandwich core materials investigated include four types of closed cell PVC foams of various densities, aluminum honeycomb, polyurethane foam, foam-filled honeycomb, and balsa wood. These materials were fully characterized under quasi-static loading and, in some cases, under high strain loading conditions as well. Sandwich beams were tested in an instrumented drop tower system under various energy levels, where load and strain histories and failure modes were recorded for the various types of beams. Peak loads predicted by spring-mass and energy balance models were in satisfactory agreement with experimental measurements. Failure patterns depend strongly on the impact energy levels and core properties. Failure modes observed include core indentation/cracking, facesheet buckling, delamination within the facesheet, and debonding between the facesheet and core. Sandwich beams with PVC cores tend to be more stable than beams with different cores. Although sandwich beams with balsa wood cores perform well under static loading, they fail catastrophically under impact loading due to the low fracture toughness along the grain direction. Sandwich beams with honeycomb cores show early catastrophic failure caused by the lack of continuity of the interface between the honeycomb core and the facesheet, resulting in debonding failure. In the case of sandwich panels, it was shown that static and impact loads of the same magnitude produce very similar far-field deformations. The induced damage is localized and is lower for impact loading than for an equivalent static loading. Static testing in general is more conservative regarding strain and damage levels. The load history, predicted by a model based on the sinusoidal shape of the impact load pulse, was in agreement with experimental results. A finite element model was implemented to capture the full response of the panel indentation. The investigation of post-impact behavior of sandwich structures shows that, although impact damage may not be readily visible, its effects on the residual mechanical properties of the structure can be quite detrimental.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abot JL (2000) Fabrication, testing and analysis of composite sandwich beams. Ph.D. Thesis, Northwestern University.
Abot JL, Daniel IM (2001a) Composite sandwich beams under low velocity impact. In: Proceedings of AIAA Conference. Seattle.
Abot JL, Daniel IM (2001b) Failure modes of composite sandwich beams under low velocity impact. ProcEedings of 16th Conference of the American Society for Composites, ASC16, Blacksburg.
Abot JL, Yasmin A, Daniel IM (2001) Impact behavior of sandwich beams with various composite facesheets and balsa wood core. Proceedings of ASME IMECE, AMD-25405.
Abot JL, Daniel IM, Gdoutos EE (2002) Contact law for composite sandwich beams. J Sandwich Struct Mater 4:157–173.
Abrate S (1997) Localized impact on sandwich structures with laminated facings. App Mech Rev 50(2):69–82.
Abrate S (1998) Impact on composite structures. Cambridge Press, Cambridge UK.
Abrate S (2001) Modeling of impacts on composite structures. Compos Struct 51:129–138.
Advanced composite compression tests, Boeing Spec Support Std, BSS 7260.
Ambur DR, Cruz J (1995) Low-speed impact response characteristics of composite sandwich panels. AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS Struct. Dyn Mater Conf Collect Tech Pap 4:2681–2689.
Anderson T, Madenci E (2000) Experimental investigation of low-velocity impact characteristics of sandwich composites. Compos Struct; 50:239–247.
Bull PH, Edgren F (2004) Compressive strength after impact of CFRP-foam core sandwich panels in marine applications. Compos Pt B, 35:535–541.
Cantwell WJ, Morton J (1991) The impact resistance of composite materials-a review. Composites 22:347–362.
Caprino G, Teti R (1994) Impact and post-impact behavior of foam core sandwich structures. Comps Struct 29:47–55.
Daniel IM (2008) The influence of core properties on failure of composite sandwich beams. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Sandwich Structures (ICSS8). Porto.
Daniel IM, Abot JL (2000) Fabrication, testing and analysis of composite sandwich beams. Comp Sci Tech 60:12–13, 2455–2463.
Daniel IM, Ishai O (2006) Engineering mechanics of composite materials, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York.
Daniel IM, Gdoutos EE, Wang K-A, Abot JL (2002) Failure modes of composite sandwich beams. Int J Damage Mech 11:309–334.
Davies GAO, Hitchings D, Besant T, Clarke A, Morgan C (2004) Compression after impact strength of composite sandwich panels. Compos Struct 63:1–9.
Determination of compression strength after impact, Airbus Industrie test method fibre reinforced plastics, AITM 1.0010.
Edgren F, Asp LE, Bull PH (2004) Compressive failure of impacted NCF composite sandwich panels – characterisation of the failure process. J Compos Mater 38(6):495–514.
Feraboli PJ, Ireland DR, Kedward KT (2003) On the role of force, energy and stiffness in low velocity impact events. Proceedings of ASC 18th Annual Tech Conference, Gainesville.
Foo CC, Chai GB, Seah LK (2008) A model to predict low-velocity impact response and damage in sandwich composites. Compos Sci Technol 68:1348–1356.
Gdoutos EE, Daniel IM, Wang KA (2002a) Failure of cellular foams under multiaxial loading. Compos Pt A 33:163–176.
Gdoutos EE, Daniel IM, Wang K-A (2002b) Indentation failure in composite sandwich structures. Exp Mech 42:426–431.
Gdoutos EE, Daniel IM, Wang K-A, Abot JL (2003) Compression facing wrinkling of composite sandwich structures. Mech Mater 35: 511–522.
Gibson LJ, Ashby MF (1999) Cellular solids, structure and properties. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Hawyes VJ, Curtis PT, Soutis C (2001) Effect of impact damage on the compressive response of composite laminates. Compos Pt A, 329:1263–1270.
Hazizan MA, Cantwell WJ (2002) The low velocity impact response of foam-based sandwich structures. Compos Pt B, 33:193–204.
Hogg PJ, Bibo GA (2000) Impact and damage tolerance. In: Hodgkinson JM (ed) Mechanical testing of advanced fibre composites. CRC, Boca Rato, FL, pp. 211–247.
Hoo Fatt MS, Park KS (2001) Dynamic models for low-velocity impact damage of composite sandwich panels-part B: damage initiation. Compos Struct 52:353–364.
Hsiao HM, Daniel IM (1998) Strain rate behavior of composite materials. Composites Pt B 29: 521–533.
Hsiao HM, Daniel IM, Cordes RD (1998) Dynamic compressive behavior of thick composite materials. Exp Mech 38:172–180.
Hsiao HM, Daniel IM, Cordes RD (1999) Strain rate effects on the transverse compressive and shear behavior of unidirectional composites. J Compos Mater 33:1629–1642.
Kärger L, Baaran J, Tessmer J (2008) Efficient simulation of low-velocity impacts on composite sandwich panels. Comp Struct 86:988–996.
Mahfuz H, Thomas T, Rangari V, Jeelani S (2006) On the dynamic response of sandwich composites and their core materials. Compos Sci Technol 66:2465–2472.
McGowan DM, Ambur DR (1999) Structural response of composite sandwich panels impacted with and without compression loading. J Aircraft 36(3):596–602.
Mines R, Worrall CM, Gibson AG (1994) The static and impact behaviour of polymer composite sandwich beams. Compos 25(2):95–110.
Nemat-Nasser S, Kang WJ, McGee JD, Guo WG, Isaacs JB (2007) Experimental investigation of energy-absorption characteristics of components of sandwich structures. Int J Impact Eng 34:1119–1146.
Nemes JA, Simmonds KE (1992) Low-velocity impact response of foam-core sandwich composites. J Compos Mater 26(4):500–519.
Olsson R (1998) Theory for small mass impact on sandwich panels. Mechanics of sandwich structures. Proceedings of EUROMECH 360, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 231–238.
Olsson R (2002) Engineering method for prediction of impact response and damage in sandwich panels. J Sandwich Struct Mater 4:3–27.
Olsson R, McManus HL (1996) Improved theory for contact indentation of sandwich panels. AIAA J, 34(6):1238–1244.
Rao S, Daniel IM (2000) Dynamic mechanical properties and failure mechanism of PVC foams. Proceedings of ASME IMECE.
SACMA recommended test method for compression after impact properties of oriented fiber-resin composites (1997) SACMA Recom Method, SRM 2–97.
Sburlati R (2002) The contact behavior between a foam core sandwich plate and a rigid indentor. Compos Pt, 33:325–332.
Scarponi C, Briotti, G, Barboni R, Marcone A, Iannone M (1996) Impact testing on composite laminates and sandwich panels. J Compos Mater 30(17):1873–1911.
Schubel PM, Luo JJ, Daniel IM (2005) Low velocity impact behavior of composite sandwich panels. Compos Part A, 36A(10):1389–96.
Schubel PM, Luo JJ, Daniel IM (2007) Impact and post impact behavior of composite sandwich panels. Compos Pt A 38:1051–1057.
Shipsha A, Zenkert D (2005) Compression-after-impact strength of sandwich panels with core crushing damage. Appl Compos Mater 12:149–164.
Shipsha A, Hallstrom S, Zenkert D (2003a) Failure mechanisms and modelling of impact damage in sandwich beams – a 2D approach: part I – experimental investigation. J Sandwich Struct Mater 5(1):7–31.
Shipsha A, Hallstrom S, Zenkert D (2003b) Failure mechanisms and modelling of impact damage in sandwich beams – a 2D approach: part II – analysis and modelling. J Sandwich Struct Mater 5(1):33–51.
Sierakowski RL, Chaturvedi SK (1997) Dynamic loading and characterization of fiber reinforced composites. John Wiley, New York.
Tsang P, Dugundji J (1992) Damage resistance of graphite/epoxy sandwich panels under low speed impacts. J Am Helicopter Soc 37:75–81.
Vaidya AS, Vaidya UK, Uddin N (2008) Impact response of three-dimensional multifunctional sandwich composite. Mater Sci Eng A 472:52–58.
Vinson JR (2001) Sandwich structures. App Mech Rev 54(3):201–214.
Vlasov VZ, Leont’ev UN (1996) Beams Plates and Shells on Elastic Foundations. Israel Prog for Sci Translation, Jerusalem, Ch. 4.
Zenkert D (1995) An introduction to sandwich construction. Engineering Materials Advisory Services, London.
Zenkert D, Shipsha A, Bull P, Hayman B (2005) Damage tolerance assessment of composite sandwich panels with localized damage. Compos Sci Technol 65:2597–2611.
Acknowledgments
This review is based on research sponsored by the Office of Naval Research (ONR) under the management of Dr. Y.D.S. Rajapakse. I am grateful to Dr. Rajapakse for his support and encouragement. I also wish to acknowledge the collaboration and significant contributions of my former students and associates including Professor J.L. Abot and Drs. J.J. Luo and P.M. Schubel.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Daniel, I.M. (2009). Impact Response and Damage Tolerance of Composite Sandwich Structures. In: Shukla, A., Ravichandran, G., Rajapakse, Y. (eds) Dynamic Failure of Materials and Structures. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0446-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0446-1_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-0445-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-0446-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)