Skip to main content

Impact Response and Damage Tolerance of Composite Sandwich Structures

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Dynamic Failure of Materials and Structures

Abstract

The deformation and failure response of composite sandwich beams and panels under low velocity impact was reviewed and discussed. Sandwich facesheet materials discussed are unidirectional and woven carbon/epoxy, and woven glass/vinylester composite laminates; sandwich core materials investigated include four types of closed cell PVC foams of various densities, aluminum honeycomb, polyurethane foam, foam-filled honeycomb, and balsa wood. These materials were fully characterized under quasi-static loading and, in some cases, under high strain loading conditions as well. Sandwich beams were tested in an instrumented drop tower system under various energy levels, where load and strain histories and failure modes were recorded for the various types of beams. Peak loads predicted by spring-mass and energy balance models were in satisfactory agreement with experimental measurements. Failure patterns depend strongly on the impact energy levels and core properties. Failure modes observed include core indentation/cracking, facesheet buckling, delamination within the facesheet, and debonding between the facesheet and core. Sandwich beams with PVC cores tend to be more stable than beams with different cores. Although sandwich beams with balsa wood cores perform well under static loading, they fail catastrophically under impact loading due to the low fracture toughness along the grain direction. Sandwich beams with honeycomb cores show early catastrophic failure caused by the lack of continuity of the interface between the honeycomb core and the facesheet, resulting in debonding failure. In the case of sandwich panels, it was shown that static and impact loads of the same magnitude produce very similar far-field deformations. The induced damage is localized and is lower for impact loading than for an equivalent static loading. Static testing in general is more conservative regarding strain and damage levels. The load history, predicted by a model based on the sinusoidal shape of the impact load pulse, was in agreement with experimental results. A finite element model was implemented to capture the full response of the panel indentation. The investigation of post-impact behavior of sandwich structures shows that, although impact damage may not be readily visible, its effects on the residual mechanical properties of the structure can be quite detrimental.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abot JL (2000) Fabrication, testing and analysis of composite sandwich beams. Ph.D. Thesis, Northwestern University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abot JL, Daniel IM (2001a) Composite sandwich beams under low velocity impact. In: Proceedings of AIAA Conference. Seattle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abot JL, Daniel IM (2001b) Failure modes of composite sandwich beams under low velocity impact. ProcEedings of 16th Conference of the American Society for Composites, ASC16, Blacksburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abot JL, Yasmin A, Daniel IM (2001) Impact behavior of sandwich beams with various composite facesheets and balsa wood core. Proceedings of ASME IMECE, AMD-25405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abot JL, Daniel IM, Gdoutos EE (2002) Contact law for composite sandwich beams. J Sandwich Struct Mater 4:157–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrate S (1997) Localized impact on sandwich structures with laminated facings. App Mech Rev 50(2):69–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrate S (1998) Impact on composite structures. Cambridge Press, Cambridge UK.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Abrate S (2001) Modeling of impacts on composite structures. Compos Struct 51:129–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Advanced composite compression tests, Boeing Spec Support Std, BSS 7260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambur DR, Cruz J (1995) Low-speed impact response characteristics of composite sandwich panels. AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS Struct. Dyn Mater Conf Collect Tech Pap 4:2681–2689.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson T, Madenci E (2000) Experimental investigation of low-velocity impact characteristics of sandwich composites. Compos Struct; 50:239–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bull PH, Edgren F (2004) Compressive strength after impact of CFRP-foam core sandwich panels in marine applications. Compos Pt B, 35:535–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell WJ, Morton J (1991) The impact resistance of composite materials-a review. Composites 22:347–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caprino G, Teti R (1994) Impact and post-impact behavior of foam core sandwich structures. Comps Struct 29:47–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel IM (2008) The influence of core properties on failure of composite sandwich beams. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Sandwich Structures (ICSS8). Porto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel IM, Abot JL (2000) Fabrication, testing and analysis of composite sandwich beams. Comp Sci Tech 60:12–13, 2455–2463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel IM, Ishai O (2006) Engineering mechanics of composite materials, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel IM, Gdoutos EE, Wang K-A, Abot JL (2002) Failure modes of composite sandwich beams. Int J Damage Mech 11:309–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies GAO, Hitchings D, Besant T, Clarke A, Morgan C (2004) Compression after impact strength of composite sandwich panels. Compos Struct 63:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Determination of compression strength after impact, Airbus Industrie test method fibre reinforced plastics, AITM 1.0010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgren F, Asp LE, Bull PH (2004) Compressive failure of impacted NCF composite sandwich panels – characterisation of the failure process. J Compos Mater 38(6):495–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feraboli PJ, Ireland DR, Kedward KT (2003) On the role of force, energy and stiffness in low velocity impact events. Proceedings of ASC 18th Annual Tech Conference, Gainesville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foo CC, Chai GB, Seah LK (2008) A model to predict low-velocity impact response and damage in sandwich composites. Compos Sci Technol 68:1348–1356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gdoutos EE, Daniel IM, Wang KA (2002a) Failure of cellular foams under multiaxial loading. Compos Pt A 33:163–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gdoutos EE, Daniel IM, Wang K-A (2002b) Indentation failure in composite sandwich structures. Exp Mech 42:426–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gdoutos EE, Daniel IM, Wang K-A, Abot JL (2003) Compression facing wrinkling of composite sandwich structures. Mech Mater 35: 511–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson LJ, Ashby MF (1999) Cellular solids, structure and properties. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawyes VJ, Curtis PT, Soutis C (2001) Effect of impact damage on the compressive response of composite laminates. Compos Pt A, 329:1263–1270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazizan MA, Cantwell WJ (2002) The low velocity impact response of foam-based sandwich structures. Compos Pt B, 33:193–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogg PJ, Bibo GA (2000) Impact and damage tolerance. In: Hodgkinson JM (ed) Mechanical testing of advanced fibre composites. CRC, Boca Rato, FL, pp. 211–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoo Fatt MS, Park KS (2001) Dynamic models for low-velocity impact damage of composite sandwich panels-part B: damage initiation. Compos Struct 52:353–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao HM, Daniel IM (1998) Strain rate behavior of composite materials. Composites Pt B 29: 521–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao HM, Daniel IM, Cordes RD (1998) Dynamic compressive behavior of thick composite materials. Exp Mech 38:172–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao HM, Daniel IM, Cordes RD (1999) Strain rate effects on the transverse compressive and shear behavior of unidirectional composites. J Compos Mater 33:1629–1642.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kärger L, Baaran J, Tessmer J (2008) Efficient simulation of low-velocity impacts on composite sandwich panels. Comp Struct 86:988–996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahfuz H, Thomas T, Rangari V, Jeelani S (2006) On the dynamic response of sandwich composites and their core materials. Compos Sci Technol 66:2465–2472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGowan DM, Ambur DR (1999) Structural response of composite sandwich panels impacted with and without compression loading. J Aircraft 36(3):596–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mines R, Worrall CM, Gibson AG (1994) The static and impact behaviour of polymer composite sandwich beams. Compos 25(2):95–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nemat-Nasser S, Kang WJ, McGee JD, Guo WG, Isaacs JB (2007) Experimental investigation of energy-absorption characteristics of components of sandwich structures. Int J Impact Eng 34:1119–1146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nemes JA, Simmonds KE (1992) Low-velocity impact response of foam-core sandwich composites. J Compos Mater 26(4):500–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsson R (1998) Theory for small mass impact on sandwich panels. Mechanics of sandwich structures. Proceedings of EUROMECH 360, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 231–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson R (2002) Engineering method for prediction of impact response and damage in sandwich panels. J Sandwich Struct Mater 4:3–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsson R, McManus HL (1996) Improved theory for contact indentation of sandwich panels. AIAA J, 34(6):1238–1244.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rao S, Daniel IM (2000) Dynamic mechanical properties and failure mechanism of PVC foams. Proceedings of ASME IMECE.

    Google Scholar 

  • SACMA recommended test method for compression after impact properties of oriented fiber-resin composites (1997) SACMA Recom Method, SRM 2–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sburlati R (2002) The contact behavior between a foam core sandwich plate and a rigid indentor. Compos Pt, 33:325–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarponi C, Briotti, G, Barboni R, Marcone A, Iannone M (1996) Impact testing on composite laminates and sandwich panels. J Compos Mater 30(17):1873–1911.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubel PM, Luo JJ, Daniel IM (2005) Low velocity impact behavior of composite sandwich panels. Compos Part A, 36A(10):1389–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schubel PM, Luo JJ, Daniel IM (2007) Impact and post impact behavior of composite sandwich panels. Compos Pt A 38:1051–1057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shipsha A, Zenkert D (2005) Compression-after-impact strength of sandwich panels with core crushing damage. Appl Compos Mater 12:149–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shipsha A, Hallstrom S, Zenkert D (2003a) Failure mechanisms and modelling of impact damage in sandwich beams – a 2D approach: part I – experimental investigation. J Sandwich Struct Mater 5(1):7–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shipsha A, Hallstrom S, Zenkert D (2003b) Failure mechanisms and modelling of impact damage in sandwich beams – a 2D approach: part II – analysis and modelling. J Sandwich Struct Mater 5(1):33–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sierakowski RL, Chaturvedi SK (1997) Dynamic loading and characterization of fiber reinforced composites. John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsang P, Dugundji J (1992) Damage resistance of graphite/epoxy sandwich panels under low speed impacts. J Am Helicopter Soc 37:75–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaidya AS, Vaidya UK, Uddin N (2008) Impact response of three-dimensional multifunctional sandwich composite. Mater Sci Eng A 472:52–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinson JR (2001) Sandwich structures. App Mech Rev 54(3):201–214.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Vlasov VZ, Leont’ev UN (1996) Beams Plates and Shells on Elastic Foundations. Israel Prog for Sci Translation, Jerusalem, Ch. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zenkert D (1995) An introduction to sandwich construction. Engineering Materials Advisory Services, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zenkert D, Shipsha A, Bull P, Hayman B (2005) Damage tolerance assessment of composite sandwich panels with localized damage. Compos Sci Technol 65:2597–2611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This review is based on research sponsored by the Office of Naval Research (ONR) under the management of Dr. Y.D.S. Rajapakse. I am grateful to Dr. Rajapakse for his support and encouragement. I also wish to acknowledge the collaboration and significant contributions of my former students and associates including Professor J.L. Abot and Drs. J.J. Luo and P.M. Schubel.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Daniel, I.M. (2009). Impact Response and Damage Tolerance of Composite Sandwich Structures. In: Shukla, A., Ravichandran, G., Rajapakse, Y. (eds) Dynamic Failure of Materials and Structures. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0446-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0446-1_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-0445-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-0446-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics