Advertisement

The Feed-Forward Chain as a Filter-Amplifier Motif

  • Martin Golubitsky
  • LieJune Shiau
  • Claire Postlethwaite
  • Yanyan Zhang
Chapter
Part of the Springer Series in Computational Neuroscience book series (NEUROSCI, volume 3)

Abstract

Hudspeth, Magnasco, and collaborators have suggested that the auditory system works by tuning a collection of hair cells near Hopf bifurcation, but each with a different frequency. An incoming sound signal to the cochlea then resonates most strongly with one of these hair cells, which then informs the auditory neuronal system of the frequency of the incoming signal. In this chapter, we discuss two mathematical issues. First, we describe how periodic forcing of systems near a point of Hopf bifurcation is generally more complicated than the description given in these auditory system models. Second, we discuss how the periodic forcing of coupling identical systems whose internal dynamics is each tuned near a point of Hopf bifurcation leads naturally to successive amplification of the incoming signal. We call this coupled system a feed-forward chain and suggest that it is a mathematical candidate for a motif.

Keywords

Periodic Solution Normal Form Hair Cell Hopf Bifurcation Bifurcation Diagram 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Gemunu Gunaratne, Krešimir Josić, Edgar Knobloch, Mary Silber, Jean-Jacques Slotine, and Ian Stewart for helpful conversations. This research was supported in part by NSF Grant DMS-0604429 and ARP Grant 003652-0009-2006.

References

  1. 1.
    U. Alon. An Introduction to Systems Biology: Design Principles of Biological Circuits. CRC, Boca Raton, 2006.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Bear, B. Connors, and M. Paradiso. Neuroscience: Exploring the Brain. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia PA, 2006.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    N.N. Bogoliubov and Y.A. Mitropolsky. Asymptotic Methods in the Theory of Non-linear Oscillations. Hindustan Publ. Corp., Delhi, 1961.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    H.W. Broer and G. Vector. Generic Hopf-Neimark-Sacker bifurcations in feed-forward systems. Nonlinearity 21 (2008) 1547–1578.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. Camalet, T. Duke, F. Jülicher, and J. Prost. Auditory sensitivity provided by self-tuned oscillations of hair cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 97 (2000) 3183–3188.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Y. Choe, M.O. Magnasco, and A.J. Hudspeth. A model for amplification of hair-bundle motion by cyclical binding of Ca 2 +to mechanoelectrical-transduction channels. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95 (1998) 15321–15326.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    V.M. Eguíluz, M. Ospeck, Y. Choe, A.J. Hudspeth, and M.O. Magnasco. Essential nonlinearities in hearing. Phys. Rev. Lett., 84 (2000) 5232–5235.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    T. Elmhirst and M. Golubitsky. Nilpotent Hopf bifurcations in coupled cell systems. J. Appl. Dynam. Sys. 5 (2006) 205–251.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    C. D. Geisler and C. Sang. A cochlear model using feed-forward outer-hair-cell forces. Hearing Res. 86 (1995) 132–146.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    D.W. Jordan and P. Smith. Nonlinear Ordinary Differential Equations, fourth ed. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2007.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Golubitsky and R. Lauterbach. Bifurcations from Synchrony in Homogeneous Networks: Linear Theory. SIAM J. Appl. Dynam. Sys. 8 (1) (2009) 40–75.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. Golubitsky, M. Nicol, and I. Stewart. Some curious phenomena in coupled cell networks. J. Nonlinear Sci. 14 (2) (2004) 207–236.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Golubitsky and D.G. Schaeffer. Singularities and Groups in Bifurcation Theory: Vol. I. Appl. Math. Sci. 51, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1984.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. Golubitsky and I. Stewart. The Symmetry Perspective: From Equilibrium to Chaos in Phase Space and Physical Space. Birkhäuser, Basel 2002.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. Golubitsky and I. Stewart. Nonlinear dynamics of networks: the groupoid formalism. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 43 No. 3 (2006) 305–364.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. Golubitsky, I. Stewart, and A. Török. Patterns of synchrony in coupled cell networks with multiple arrows. SIAM J. Appl. Dynam. Sys. 4 (1) (2005) 78–100.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    A.J. Hudspeth. Mechanical amplification of stimuli by hair cells, Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 7 (1997) 480–486.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    A.J. Hudspeth and R.S. Lewis. Kinetic-analysis of voltage-dependent and ion-dependent conductances in saccular hair-cells of the bull frog, rana catesbeiana. J. Physiol. 400 (1988) 237–274.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    A.J. Hudspeth and R.S. Lewis. A model for electrical resonance and frequency tuning in saccular hair cells of the bull frog, rana catesbeiana. J. Physiol. 400 (1988) 275–297.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    T.S.A. Jaffer, H. Kunov, and W. Wong. A model cochlear partition involving longitudinal elasticity. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112 No. 2 (2002) 576–589.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    F. Jülicher, D. Andor, and T. Duke. Physical basis of two-tone interference in hearing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 98 (2001) 9080–9085.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    J. Keener and J. Sneyd. Mathematical Physiology Interdisciplinary. Applied Mathematics 8, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1998.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    A. Kern and R. Stoop. Essential role of couplings between hearing nonlinearities. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 No. 12 (2003) 128101.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    M.C.A. Leite and M. Golubitsky. Homogeneous three-cell networks. Nonlinearity 19 (2006) 2313–2363. DOI: 10.1088/0951-7715/19/10/04Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    M. Magnasco. A wave traveling over a Hopf instability shapes the Cochlea tuning curve. Phys. Rev. E 90 No. 5 (2003) 058101-1.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    N.J. McCullen, T. Mullin, and M. Golubitsky. Sensitive signal detection using a feed-forward oscillator network. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 254101.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    K.A. Montgomery, M. Silber, and S.A. Solla. Amplification in the auditory periphery: The effect of coupled tuning mechanisms. Phys. Rev. E 75 (2007) 051924.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    M. Ospeck, V. M. Eguíluz, and M. O. Magnasco. Evidence of a Hopf bifurcation in frog hair cells. Biophys. J. 80 (2001) 2597–2607.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    L. Robles and M. A. Ruggero. Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea. Physiol. Rev. 81 (3) (2001) 1305–1352.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    L. Robles, M. A. Ruggero and N. C. Rich. Two-tone distortion in the basilar membrane of the cochlea. Nature 349 (1991) 413.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    I. Stewart, M. Golubitsky, and M. Pivato. Symmetry groupoids and patterns of synchrony in coupled cell networks. SIAM J. Appl. Dynam. Sys. 2 No. 4 (2003) 609–646.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    R. Stoop and A. Kern. Two-tone suppression and combination tone generation as computations performed by the Hopf cochlea. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 268103.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Q. Wang and L.S. Young. Strange attractors in periodically-kicked limit cycles and Hopf bifurcations. Commun. Math. Phys. 240 No. 3 (2003) 509–529.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Y. Zhang. PhD Thesis, Ohio State University.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Golubitsky
    • 1
  • LieJune Shiau
  • Claire Postlethwaite
  • Yanyan Zhang
  1. 1.Mathematical Biosciences InstituteOhio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations