• Alex A. T. Bui
  • Ricky K. Taira
  • Hooshang Kangarloo


Medical imaging informatics is the rapidly evolving field that combines biomedical informatics and imaging, developing and adapting core methods in informatics to improve the usage and application of imaging in healthcare; and to derive new knowledge from imaging studies. This chapter introduces the ideas and motivation behind medical imaging informatics. Starting with an illustration of the importance of imaging in today’s patient care, we demonstrate imaging informatics’ potential in enhancing clinical care and biomedical research. From this perspective, we provide an example of how different aspects of medical imaging informatics can impact the process of selecting an imaging protocol. To help readers appreciate this growing discipline, a brief history is given of different efforts that have contributed to its development over several decades, leading to its current challenges.


Knee Pain Chief Complaint Biomedical Informatics Imaging Informatics Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Aberegg SK, Terry PB (2004) Medical decision-making and healthcare disparities: The physician’s role. J Lab Clin Med, 144(1):11-17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    American College of Radiology (ACR) (2005) ACR chair tells House Committee unnecessary and inferior medical imaging lowers quality of care, costs taxpayers. American College of Radiology. . Accessed April 23, 2009.
  3. 3.
    Berbaum KS, Franken EA, Jr., Dorfman DD, Lueben KR (1994) Influence of clinical history on perception of abnormalities in pediatric radiographs. Acad Radiol, 1(3):217-223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bui AA, Taira RK, Goldman D, Dionisio JD, Aberle DR, El-Saden S, Sayre J, Rice T, Kangarloo H (2004) Effect of an imaging-based streamlined electronic healthcare process on quality and costs. Acad Radiol, 11(1):13-20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Clayman CB, Curry RH (1992) The American Medical Association Guide to Your Family’s Symptoms. 1st updated pbk. edition. Random House, New York.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Croskerry P (2002) Achieving quality in clinical decision making: Cognitive strategies and detection of bias. Acad Emerg Med, 9(11):1184-1204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    DeWalt DA, Rothrock N, Yount S, Stone AA (2007) Evaluation of item candidates: The PROMIS qualitative item review. Med Care, 45(5 Suppl 1):S12-21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dwyer III SJ (2000) A personalized view of the history of PACS in the USA. Medical Imaging 2000: PACS Design and Evaluation: Engineering and Clinical Issues, vol 3980. SPIE, San Diego, CA, USA, pp 2-9.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Edep ME, Shah NB, Tateo IM, Massie BM (1997) Differences between primary care physicians and cardiologists in management of congestive heart failure: Relation to practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol, 30(2):518-526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Greenes RA (2007) A brief history of clinical decision support: Technical, social, cultural, economic, and governmental perspectives. In: Greenes RA (ed) Clinical Decision Support: The Road Ahead. Elsevier Academic Press, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Huang HK (2004) PACS and Imaging Informatics: Basic Principles and Applications. 2nd edition. Wiley-Liss, Hoboken, NJ.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kangarloo H, Valdez JA, Yao L, Chen S, Curran J, Goldman D, Sinha U, Dionisio JD, Taira R, Sayre J, Seeger L, Johnson R, Barbaric Z, Steckel R (2000) Improving the quality of care through routine teleradiology consultation. Acad Radiol, 7(3):149-155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kansal AR, Torquato S, Harsh GI, Chiocca EA, Deisboeck TS (2000) Simulated brain tumor growth dynamics using a three-dimensional cellular automaton. J Theor Biol, 203(4):367-382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kulikowski C, Ammenwerth E, Bohne A, Ganser K, Haux R, Knaup P, Maier C, Michel A, Singer R, Wolff AC (2002) Medical imaging informatics and medical informatics: Opportunities and constraints. Findings from the IMIA Yearbook of Medical Informatics 2002. Methods Inf Med, 41(2):183-189.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kulikowski CA (1997) Medical imaging informatics: Challenges of definition and integration. J Am Med Inform Assoc, 4(3):252-253.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pantazi SV, Arocha JF, Moehr JR (2004) Case-based medical informatics. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak, 4:19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network (2008) Comprehensive genomic char¬acterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways. Nature, 455(7216):1061-1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Thrall JH (2007) Teleradiology: Part I. History and clinical applications. Radiology, 243(3):613-617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alex A. T. Bui
    • 1
  • Ricky K. Taira
    • 1
  • Hooshang Kangarloo
    • 2
  1. 1.Medical Imaging Informatics Group Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of MedicineUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Medical Imaging InformaticsUCLA David Geffen School of MedicineLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations