Reading Religious Violence in Terms of Theories of Social Action



Religious violence is a challenge to students of religions. Do we need categories like “cult,” “fundamentalism,” or “terrorism” in order to distinguish it from religion? Or do monotheistic religions claiming exclusiveness necessarily generate intolerance? The study of spectacular cases of religious violence in the United States shows that violence occurs at the end of a conflict rather than at the beginning. Reading religious violence in terms of theory of action, this contribution takes a closer look at the link between religion and violence. For a religious actor, like all others, every action is based on a definition of the situation: he selects from a stock of divergent traditions the particular norm or example that he regards as fitting the situation and justifying his action. Jews, Muslims, and American Protestants involved in the conflict over Jerusalem and Palestine select and revise transmitted religious scenarios in order to justify their use of violence. The paper presents the main religious metaphors, explains why and when religious actors have encouraged violent actions, and traces the ethical debates within these communities.


Jewish Community Religious Community Geneva Convention Faith Community Charitable Organization 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Abu-Amr, Z. (1994). Islamic Fundamentalism in the West Bank and Gaza. Muslim Brotherhood and Islamic Jihad. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ammerman, N. (1995). Waco, federal law enforcement, and scholars of religion. In S. A. Wright (Ed.), Armageddon in Waco: Critical Perspectives on the Branch Davidian Conflict (pp.282–296). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. Aran, G. (1991). Jewish zionist fundamentalism: the bloc of the faithful in Israel (Gush Emunim). In M. E. Marty and R. S. Appleby (Eds.), Fundamentalisms Observed. The Fundamentalism Project, Vol. 1 (pp.265–344). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. Aran, G. (1997). The father, the son, and the holy land. In R. S. Appleby (Ed.), Spokesmen for the Despised. Fundamentalist Leaders of the Middle East (pp.294–327). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. Assmann, J. (1998). Moses der Ägypter. Entzifferung einer Gedächtnisspur. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
  6. Assmann, J. (2003). Die mosaische Unterscheidung oder der Preis des Monotheismus. Munich: Hanser.Google Scholar
  7. Assmann, J. (2006). Monotheismus und die Sprache der Gewalt. Vienna: Picus.Google Scholar
  8. Berger, P. (1967). The Sacred Canopy. Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion. New York, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  9. Blumenberg, H. (1983). The Legitimacy of the Modern Age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bromley, D. G. (Ed.) (1998). The Politics of Religious Apostasy. The Role of Apostates in the Transformation of Religious Movements. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  11. Burr, J. M. and Collins, R. O. (2006). Alms for Jihad. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Chehab, Z. (2007). Inside Hamas. The Untold Story of Militants, Martyrs and Spies. London: Nations Book.Google Scholar
  13. Chidester, D. (1998). Salvation and Suicide: An Interpretation of Jim Jones, the People’s Temple, and Jonestown, 2nd Edition. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
  14. Cook, D. (2005). Contemporary Muslim Apocalyptic Literature. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Damir-Geilsdorf, S. (2003). Herrschaft und Gesellschaft. Der islamische Wegbereiter Sayyid Qutb und seine Rezeption. Würzburg: Ergon.Google Scholar
  16. Danner, M. (2004). Torture and Truth. America, Abu Ghraib, and the War on Terror. New York, NY: New York Review Books.Google Scholar
  17. Esser, H. (1999). Soziologie: Spezielle Grundlagen Vol. 1, Situationslogik und Handeln. Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar
  18. Esser, H. (2000). Soziologie: Spezielle Grundlagen, Vol. 5, Institutionen. Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar
  19. Esser, H. (2001). Soziologie: Spezielle Grundlagen, Vol. 6, Sinn und Kultur. Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar
  20. Fawzi, I. and Lübben, I. (2004). Die ägyptische Jama’a al-islamiya und die Revision der Gewaltstrategie. Deutsches Orient-Institut Hamburg DOI Focus 15.Google Scholar
  21. Forbes, B. D. and Kilde, J. H. (Eds.) (2004). Rapture, Revelation, and the End Times. Exploring the Left Behind Series. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  22. Gerth, H. H. and Wright, C. (Trans. and Eds.) (1946). From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, Oxford: University Press. Later reprints.Google Scholar
  23. Gorenberg, G. (2000). The End of Days: Fundamentalism and the Struggle for the Temple Mount. Oxford: Free Press.Google Scholar
  24. Gorenberg, G. (2006). The Accidental Empire: Israel and the Birth of the Settlements, 1967–1977. New York, NY: Times Books.Google Scholar
  25. Greeley, A. (2003). Religion in Europe at the End of the Second Millennium. New Brunswick, NJ/London: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  26. Hall, J. R. (1987). Gone from the Promised Land: Jonestown in American Cultural History. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
  27. Hall, J. R., Schuyler, P. D., and Trinh, S. (2000). Apocalypse observed: religious movements and violence in North America, Europe, and Japan. London/New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Henten, J. W. van (Ed.) (1989). Die Entstehung der jüdischen Martyrologie. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
  29. Hobbes, T. (1651). Leviathan, or the Matter, Forme, & Power of a Common-Wealth Ecclesiastical and Civill. London: Penguin 1968.Google Scholar
  30. Hroub, K. (2000). Hamas: Political Thought and Practice. Washington, DC: Institute for Palestine Studies.Google Scholar
  31. Joas, H. (1996). Die Kreativität des Handelns. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  32. Kapitan, T. (2003). The Terrorism of ‘Terrorism’. In J. Sterba (Ed.), Terrorism and International Justice (pp.47–66). New York, NY, and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Kennedy, R. (1999). Is one person’s terrorist another’s freedom fighter? Western and Islamic approaches to ‘just war’ compared. In Terrorism and Political Violence, 11(1), 1–21.Google Scholar
  34. Kippenberg, H. G. (1983). Die Entlassung aus Schuldknechtschaft im antiken Judäa: Eine Legitimitätsvorstellung von Verwandtschaftsgruppen. In G. Kehrer (Ed.), Vor Gott sind alle gleich. Soziale Gleichheit, soziale Ungleichheit und die Religionen (pp.74–104). Düsseldorf: Patmos.Google Scholar
  35. Kippenberg, H. G. and Seidensticker, T. (Eds.) (2006). The 9/11 Handbook. Annotated Translation and Interpretation of the Attackers’ Spiritual Manual. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
  36. Kippenberg, H. G. (2008). Vom Quietismus zum Aktivismus – Apokalyptische Pragmatik, überprüft anhand des Falles Hamas. In A. K. Nagel, B. U. Schipper, and A. Weymann (Eds.), Apokalypse. Zur Soziologie und Geschichte religiöser Krisenrhetorik (pp.262–288). Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar
  37. Krämer, G. (2002). Geschichte Palästinas. Von der osmanischen Eroberung bis zur Gründung des Staates Israel. München: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
  38. Lawrence, B. (Ed.) (2005). Messages to the World. The Statements of Osama bin Laden. Translated by James Howarth. London/New York, NY: Verso.Google Scholar
  39. Makropoulos, M. (2004). Kontingenz. Aspekte einer theoretischen Semantik der Moderne. Archive Européenne de Sociologie, 45, 369–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mearsheimer, J. J. and Watt, S. M. (2007). Die Israel Lobby. Wie die amerikanische Außenpolitik beeinflusst wird. Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar
  41. Moore, R. and McGehee III, F. (Eds.) (1989). New Religious Movements, Mass Suicide, and Peoples Temple. Scholarly Perspectives on a Tragedy. Lewiston, ME: Edwin Mellen.Google Scholar
  42. Netanyahu, B. (Ed.) (1986). Terrorism. How the West Can Win. New York, NY: Farrar Straus Giroux.Google Scholar
  43. Newport, K. (2006). The Branch Davidians of Waco: The History and Belief of an Apocalyptic Sect. New York, NY: Oxford UP.Google Scholar
  44. Pape, R. A. (2005). Dying to Win: The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism. New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
  45. Pufendorf, S. (1991). De officio hominis et civis iuxta legem naturalem libri duo (1673). English translation: On the Duty of Man and Citizen According to Natural Law. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Quigley, J. (2005). The Case for Palestine. An International Law Perspective. Revised and updated. Durham, NC: University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Qutb, S. (1981). Milestones. Delhi: Markazi Maktaba Islami.Google Scholar
  48. Ravitzky, A. (1996). Messianism, Zionism, and Jewish Radicalism. Translated from the Hebrew by M. Swirsky and J. Chipman. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Rousseau, J.-J. (1762). The Creed of a Priest of Savoy. New York, NY: Ungar 1965.Google Scholar
  50. Schäfer, P. (1983). Geschichte der Juden in der Antike. Die Juden Palästinas von Alexander dem Großen bis zur arabischen Eroberung. Stuttgart/Neukirchen-Vluyn: Katholisches Bibelwerk.Google Scholar
  51. Schluchter, W. (1988). Religion und Lebensführung, Band 1: Studien zu Max Webers Kultur- und Werttheorie. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  52. Schmidinger, H. (Ed.) (2003). Wege zur Toleranz. Geschichte einer europäischen Idee in Quellen. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
  53. Schmitt, C. (1979) [1932]. Der Begriff des Politischen. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
  54. Sivan, E. (2003). The enclave culture. In G. A. Almond, R. S. Appleby, and E. Sivan (Eds.), Strong Religion. The Rise of Fundamentalisms around the World (pp.23–89). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  55. Smith, J. Z. (1982). Imagining Religion: From Babylon to Jonestown. Chicago, IL, and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  56. Sprinzak, E. (1991). The Ascendance of Israel’s Radical Right. New York, NY: Oxford UP.Google Scholar
  57. Sprinzak, E. (1999). Brother Against Brother: Violence and Extremism in Israeli Politics from Altalena to the Rabin Assassination. New York, NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  58. Sullivan, L. E. (1996). ‘No longer the Messiah’: U.S. Federal Law Enforcement views of religion in connection with the 1993 siege of Mount Carmel near Waco, Texas. Numen, 43, 213–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Thomas, W. I. and Thomas, D. S. (1928). The Child in America: Behavior Problems and Programs. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  60. Weber, T. P. (2004). On the Road to Armageddon: How Evangelicals Became Israel’s Best Friends. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic.Google Scholar
  61. Wessinger, C. (2000). How the Millennium Comes Violently: From Jonestown to Heaven’s Gate. New York, NY: Seven Bridges.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Jacobs UniversityBremenGermany

Personalised recommendations