Prospects for Ethanol and Biodiesel, 2008 to 2017 and Impacts on Agriculture and Food

Part of the Natural Resource Management and Policy book series (NRMP, volume 33)


The impacts of increased biofuels production on key agricultural variables and consumer prices are analyzed using a multisector econometric model AGMOD. A “baseline” scenario and three alternative crude oil price scenarios are presented. Results indicate that conventional biofuels mandates of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 can be met with moderate increases in crop area and consumer prices. Biodiesel production will increasingly need to draw on non-soybean oil sources. However, except under the “high crude oil price” scenario, ethanol and biodiesel will require a premium over their energy equivalent prices. Production of cellulosic ethanol is likely to be minor through 2017.


Cellulosic Ethanol Conservation Reserve Program Cellulosic Biofuel Yellow Grease Renewable Fuel Standard 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Aden A, Ruth M, Ibsen K, et al. (2002) Lignocellulosic biomass to ethanol process design and economics utilizing co-current dilute acid prehydrolysis for corn stover. NREL/TP-510-32438. Golden, CO: US Department of Energy, National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Accessed 11 September 2007.
  2. Canakci M, Van Gerpen J (2001) A pilot plant to produce biodiesel from high free fatty acid feedstocks.Paper No. 016049. 2001 ASAE Annual International Meeting, Sacramento, CA, July 30-August 1, 2001. Accessed 11 September 2007
  3. Carolan J, Joshi S, Dale B (2007) Technical and financial feasibility analysis of distributed bioprocessing using regional biomass pre-processing centers. J Agric Food Industrial Org, 5 (2)
  4. Collins K (2007) Statement of Keith Collins, Chief Economist, U.S. Department of Agriculture before the U.S. Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry, January 10, 2007. Washington, DC: Office of the Chief Economist, US Department of Agriculture, Accessed 20 June 2008.
  5. Coskata (2008) 20 June 2008.
  6. Ferris J (2005) Agricultural prices and commodity market analysis. 2nd ed. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press: 136–137.Google Scholar
  7. Ferris J (2006) Modeling the US domestic livestock feed sector in a period of rapidly expanding by-product feed supplies from ethanol production. Staff Paper 2006-34. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural Economics.Google Scholar
  8. Haas M, McAloon A, Yee W, Foglia T (2006) A process model to estimate biodiesel production costs. Bioresource Technology 97 (4):671–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jacobsen Publishing Co (2009) Biodiesel Bulletin. Fats and Oils Bulletin. Grain & Food − The Feed Bulletin. Various issues and archives. 1123 West Washington, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  10. McAloon A, Taylor F, Yee W, Ibsen K, Wooley R (2000) Determining the cost of producing ethanol from corn starch and lignocellulosic feedstocks. NREL/TP-580-28893. Golden, CO: US Department of Agriculture and US Department of Energy, National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Accessed 20 June 2008.
  11. National Biodiesel Board (2008) Commercial Biodiesel Production Plants, Accessed 20 September 2008.
  12. Renewable Fuels Association (2009) 2009 Ethanol Industry Outlook.February 2009.Google Scholar
  13. Shapouri H, Gallagher P (2005) USDA’s 2002 Ethanol cost-of-production survey. Agricultural Economic Report Number 841. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Office of Energy Policy and New Uses. Accessed 20 June 2008.
  14. US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service (2009) Statistical Indicators. Table 8. January.
  15. US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service (2008) International macroeconomic data set., Accessed 20 December 2008.
  16. US Department of Agriculture, Foreign Agriculture Service (2008) Production, Supply and Distribution Online. Accessed 20 December 2008.
  17. US Department of Energy (2007) DOE selects six cellulosic ethanol plants for up to $385 million in federal funding. Press Release 4827. Washington, DC: US Department of Energy, February 28, 2007. Accessed 11 September 2007
  18. US Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration (2008) Annual energy outlook 2008 with projections to 2030. Report # DOE/EIA-0383(2008) Washington, DC: US Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration. Accessed 28 June 2008
  19. US Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration (2008) Annual energy outlook 2009. #DOE/EIA − 0383(2009) Early Release.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource EconomicsMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations