Optimizing the Biofuels Infrastructure: Transportation Networks and Biorefinery Locations in Illinois

  • Seungmo Kang
  • Hayri Önal
  • Yanfeng Ouyang
  • Jürgen Scheffran
  • Ü Deniz Tursun
Part of the Natural Resource Management and Policy book series (NRMP, volume 33)


Growing biofuel mandates pose considerable challenges to the infrastructure needed across all stages of the supply chain − from crop production, feedstock harvesting, storage, transportation, and processing to biofuel distribution and use. This chapter focuses on the biofuel transportation and distribution network infrastructure, using Illinois as a case study. Building on an optimal land use allocation model for feedstock production, a mathematical programming model is used to determine optimal locations and capacities of biorefineries, delivery of bioenergy crops to biorefineries, and processing and distribution of ethanol and co-products (DDGS). The model aims to minimize total system costs in a multiyear planning horizon for the period of 2007–2022. Certain locations may be more suitable for corn and corn stover-based ethanol plants, others more for producing ethanol using perennial grasses (miscanthus)


Corn Stover Planning Horizon Cellulosic Ethanol Bioenergy Crop Cellulosic Biomass 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. API (2008) “Shipping Ethanol Through Pipelines.” American Petroleum Institute. Available at http://www.api.org/aboutoilgas/sectors/pipeline/upload/pipelineethanolshipment-2.doc. Accessed on May 15, 2009.
  2. Babcock BA, Hayes DJ and Lawrence JD (eds) (2008) “Using Distillers Grains in the U.S. and International Livestock and Poultry Industries,” Midwest Agribusiness Trade Research and Information Center, Iowa State University, Ames, IAGoogle Scholar
  3. Brat I and Machalaba D (2007) “Can Ethanol Get a Ticket to Ride?,” The Wall Street Journal, Feb. 1, p. B1.Google Scholar
  4. Brown R, Orwig E, Nemeth J and Subietta Rocha C (2007) “Economic potential for ethanol expansion in Illinois”, Illinois Institute for Rural Affairs at Western Illinois University, Macomb, IL.Google Scholar
  5. CRS (2007) “Ethanol and Other Biofuels-Potential for U.S.-Brazil Energy Cooperation.” Congressional Research Service, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  6. Dantzig GB and Thapa MN (2003) Linear Programming: Theory and Extensions. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  7. Daskin MS (1995) Network and Discrete Location: Models, Algorithms, and Applications. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  8. De La Torre Ugarte DG and Ray DE (2000) “Biomass and bioenergy applications of the POLYSYS modeling framework.” Biomass and Bioenergy 18: 291–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dijkstra EW (1959) “A Note on Two Problems in Connexion with Graphs.” Numerische Mathematik 1: 269–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dooley FJ, Cox M and Cox L (2008) “Distillers Grain Handbook: A Guide for Indiana Producers to Using DDGS for Animal Feed”, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, http://incorn.org/images/stories/IndianaDDGSHandbook.pdf. Accessed on May 15, 2009.
  11. Drezner Z (1995) Facility Location. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Eathington L and Swenson DA (2007) “Dude, Where's My Corn? Constraints on the Location of Ethanol Production in the Corn Belt.” Department of Economics, Iowa State University.Google Scholar
  13. Ellinger P (2008) Ethanol Plant Simulator. Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL.Google Scholar
  14. English B, Short C and Heady EO (1981) “The Economic Feasibility of Crop Residues as Auxiliary Fuel in Coal-Fired Power Plants.” Am J Agri Econ 63(4): 636–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fuller SW, Randolph P and Klingman D (1976) “Optimizing Subindustry Marketing Organizations: A Network Analysis Approach.” Am J Agri Econ 58(3): 425–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. GAO (2007) “Biofuels: DOE Lacks a Strategic Approach to Coordinate Increasing Production with Infrastructure Development and Vehicle Needs”, U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-07-713, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  17. Hess JR, Wright CT and Kenney KLK (2007) “Cellulosic biomass feedstocks and logistics for ethanol production.” Biofuels, Bioproducts Biorefining 1(3): 181–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hilger DA, McCarl BA and Uhrig JW (1977) “Facilities Location: The Case of Grain Subterminals.” Am J Agri Econ 59(4): 674–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kamm B, Gruber PR and Kamm M, eds. (2005) Biorefineries. Biobased Industrial Processes and Products, Wiley-VCH Verlag, Weinheim.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kaylen M, Van Dyne DL, Choi YS and Blasé M (2000) “Economic feasibility of producing ethanol from lignocellulosic feedstocks.” Bioresource Tech 72: 19–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Khanna M, Dhungana B and Clifton-Brown J (2008) “Costs of producing Miscanthus and switchgrass for bioenergy in Illinois.” Biomass and Bioenergy 32(6): 482–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Khanna M, Önal H, Chen X and Huang H (2009) “Meeting Biofuels Targets: Implications for Land Use, Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Nitrogen Use in Illinois.” See  Chapter 17 in this book.
  23. Kim Y, Mosier NS, Hendrickson R, et al. (2008) “Composition of corn dry-grind ethanol by-products: DDGS, wet cake, and thin stillage”. Bioresource Tech 99(12):5165–5176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kumar A, Sokhansanj S and Flynn PC (2006) “Development of a Multicriteria Assessment Model for Ranking Biomass Feedstock Collection and Transportation Systems.” Proceedings of 27th Symposium on Biotechnology for Fuels and Chemicals, 71–87.Google Scholar
  25. Mahmudi H, Flynn PC and Checkel MD (2005) “Life Cycle Analysis of Biomass Transportation: Trains vs. Trucks.” SAE Technical Papers, http://www.sae.org/technical/papers/2005-01-1551. Accessed on May 15, 2009.
  26. Mahmudi H and Flynn P (2006) “Rail vs Truck Transport of Biomass.” Appl Biochem Biotechnol 129(1): 88–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mapemba LD (2005) “Cost to Deliver Lignocellulosic Biomass to a Biorefinery.” Ph.D Dissertation, Oklahoma State University.Google Scholar
  28. Mapemba LD, Epplin M, Taliaferro CM and Huhnke RL (2007) “Biorefinery Feedstock Production on Conservation Reserve Program Land.” Rev Agri Econ 29(2): 227–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Morrow WR, Griffin WM and Matthews HS (2006) “Modeling Switchgrass Derived Cellulosic Ethanol Distribution in the United States.” Environ Sci Technol 40(9): 2877–2886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nienow S, McNamara KT and Gillespie AR (2000) “Assessing plantation biomass for co-firing with coal in northern Indiana: A linear programming approach.“ Biomass Bioenergy 18: 125–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. NREL (2007) “A National Laboratory Market and Technology Assessment of the 30x30 Scenario”, National Renewable Energy Lab, Technical Report/TP-510-40942, January.Google Scholar
  32. Peluso T, Baker L and Thomassin PJ (1998) “The Siting of Ethanol Plants in Quebec.” Can J Region Sci 21(1): 73–86.Google Scholar
  33. RFA (2008) “Industry Statistics”, Renewable Fuel Association, accessed 28 November 2008, http://www.ethanolrfa.org/industry/locations. Accessed on May 15, 2009.
  34. Scheffran J and Bendor T (2009) “Bioenergy and Land Use – A Spatial-Agent Dynamic Model of Energy Crop Production in Illinois.” Int J Environ Pollution: in press.Google Scholar
  35. Singh V, Johnston D, Naidu K, Rausch KD, Belyea RL and Tumbleson ME (2004) Effect of modified dry grind corn processes on fermentation characteristics and ddgs composition. Proceedings of the Corn Utilization & Technology Conference, Indianapolis, IN. June 7–9.Google Scholar
  36. Sokhansanj S, Kumar A and Turhollow AF (2006) “Development and implementation of integrated biomass supply analysis and logistics model (IBSAL).” Biomass Bioenergy 30(10): 838–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. U.S.EPA (2007) “Renewable Fuel Standard Implementation.” Available at: http://www.epa.gov/OTAQ/renewablefuels/index.htm. Accessed on May 15, 2009.
  38. Tembo G, Epplin FM and Huhnke RL (2003) “Integrative investment appraisal of a lignocellulosic biomass-to-ethanol industry.” J Agri Res Econ 28(3): 611–633.Google Scholar
  39. Tursun D, Kang S, Onal H, Ouyang Y and Scheffran J (2009) “Optimum Biorefinery Locations and Transportation Network for the Future Biofuels Industry in Illinois.”: In: M. Khanna (ed.), Transition to a Bioeconomy: Environmental and Rural Development Impacts, Proceedings of Farm Foundation/USDA Conference, St. Louis, Missouri, October 15–16, 2008, Farm Foundation, Oak Brook.Google Scholar
  40. Wallace R, Ibsen K, McAloon A and Yee W (2005) “Feasibility Study for Co-Locating and Integrating Ethanol Production Plants from Corn Starch and Lignocellulosic Feedstocks.” NREL/TP-510-37092 Revised January Edition: USDA/USDOE/NREL.Google Scholar
  41. Worldwatch (2006) “Biofuels for Transportation, Global Potential and Implications for Sustainable Agriculture and Energy in the 21st Century”, Washington, D.C.: Worldwatch Institute.Google Scholar
  42. Wooley R, Ruth M, Sheehan J, Ibsen K, Majdeski H and Galvez A (1999) “Lignocellulosic biomass to ethanol – Process design and economics utilizing co-current dilute acid prehydrolysis and enzymatic hydrolysis – Current and futuristic scenarios”. Report No. TP-580-26157, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO.Google Scholar
  43. Wright M and Brown RC (2007) “Establishing the optimal sizes of different kinds of biorefineries.” Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining 1(3): 191–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Seungmo Kang
    • 1
  • Hayri Önal
    • 2
  • Yanfeng Ouyang
    • 3
  • Jürgen Scheffran
    • 4
    • 5
  • Ü Deniz Tursun
    • 3
  1. 1.Energy Biosciences InstituteUniversity of IllinoisUrbana-ChampaignUSA
  2. 2.Department of Agricultural and Consumer EconomicsUniversity of IllinoisUrbana-ChampaignUSA
  3. 3.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of IllinoisUrbana-ChampaignUSA
  4. 4.University of IllinoisUrbana-ChampaignUSA
  5. 5.Hamburg UniversityHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations