Survey of Recent Results on Weak Stability Boundaries and Applications

Conference paper


A region of transitional stability in the three-body problem has proved to have interesting mathematical properties and also important applications to several fields. This region, called the weak stability boundary, was first discovered for its use in providing a methodology for computing new types of low energy transfers. Up to recently, understanding it’s underlying structure has been elusive. Recent results on understanding the mathematical structure of this region are presented as well as associated dynamics. This includes both numerical and theoretical results indicating the underlying complicated structure of invariant hyperbolic manifolds. Associated resonance dynamics are described. Recent applications are described within the field of astronomy on a theory for the origin of the Moon and also on the minimal energy transfer of solid material between planetary systems.


Invariant Manifold Planetary System Jacobi Constant Weak Stability Boundary Ballistic Capture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



I would like to thank Telespazio and, in particular, Ettore Perozzi for the invitation to attend the workshop at Fucino in October 2007 on Novel Spaceways for Scientific and Exploration Missions. This work is partially supported by grants from NASA and the AISR program.


  1. 1.
    Arnold, V.: Mathematical Methods in Classical Mechanics, Springer-Verlag (1983)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Belbruno, E.: Random walk in the three-body problem and applications, DCDS-S, 1, n. 4, 519–540 (Dec. 2008)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Belbruno, E.: Fly Me to the Moon: An Insider’s Guide to the New Science of Space Travel, Princeton University Press (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Belbruno, E., Gott III, J.R.: Where did the moon come from? Astr. J., 129, 1724–1745 (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Belbruno, E.: Capture Dynamics and Chaotic Motions in Celestial Mechanics, Princeton University Press (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Belbruno, E.: The dynamical mechanism of ballistic lunar capture transfers in the four-body problem from the perspective of invariant manifolds and hill’s regions, Centre de Recerca Mathematica (CRM) Bellaterra(Barcelona) (, Preprint n. 270 (Dec. 1994)
  7. 7.
    Belbruno, E., Miller, J.: Sun-perturbed earth-to-moon transfers with ballistic capture, J. Guid. Control Dyn., 16, 770–775 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Belbruno, E., Topputo, F., Gidea, M.: Resonance transitions associated to weak capture in the restricted three-body problem, Advances in Space Research, 42, n. 2, 1330–1352 (2008)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Belbruno, E., Moro-Martin, A., Malhotra, R.: Minimal energy transfer of solid material between planetary systems, ArXiv:0808.3268v2(astro-ph), 1–30 (Sep. 3, 2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cameron, A.G.W., Ward, W.R.: The Origin of the Moon, Lunar and Planetary Science VII, Lunar Planetary Inst., 120–122 (1976)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Circi, C., Teofilatto, P.: On the dynamics of weak stability boundary lunar transfers, Cel. Mech. Dyn. Ast., 79, 41–72 (2001)MATHCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Conley, C.: Low energy transit orbits in the restricted three-body problem, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 16, 732–746 (1968)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Garcia, F., Gomez, G.: A note on the weak stability boundary, Cel. Mech. Dyn. Sys., 97, 87–100 (2007)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hartmann, W.K., Davis, D.R.: Satellite-sized planetesimals and lunar origin, Icarus, 24, 504–515 (1975)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Koon, W.S., Lo, M., Marsden, J.E., Ross, S.: Low energy transfer to the moon, Cel. Mech. Dyn. Astr., 81, 63–73 (2001)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Koon, W.S., Lo, M., Marsden, J.E., Ross, S.: Heteroclinic connections between periodic orbits and resonance transitions in celestial mechanics, Chaos, 10, 427–469 (2000)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Llibre, J., Olle, M.: Horseshoe periodic orbits in the restricted three-body problem, “New Advances in Celestial Mechanics: HAMYSYS 2001, (eds J. Delgado, E.A. Lacomba, J. Llibre and E. Perez-Chavela), Kluwer Academic Publishers, 137–152 (2004)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Siegel, C.L., Moser, J.K.: Lectures on Celestial Mechanics, Springer-Verlag (1971)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Topputo, F., Belbruno, E.: Computation of weak stabilities: Sun-Jupiter case, Cel. Mech. Dyn. Astr., 105(1–3) (2009) yet to be publishedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Xia, Z.: Melnikov method and transversal homoclinic points in the restricted three-body problem, J. Differ. Equ., 96, 170–184 (1992)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Astrophysical SciencesPrinceton UniversityPrincetonUSA

Personalised recommendations