Experimental Design and Data Analysis for fMRI

  • Geoffrey K. Aguirre


Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) methods continue to evolve rapidly. Subtle experimental designs have been joined by more powerful data analysis methods to detect and interpret evoked changes in neural activity. Despite constant development, there are several core principles of fMRI methodology that can be used as a guide to understand both the current state of the field and whatever advance awaits tomorrow. This chapter concerns itself primarily with this core understanding, but considers several specific aspects of fMRI experiments. Along the way, the chapter also notes some of the specific challenges that exist in the fMRI studies of clinical populations, although a detailed consideration of these issues is contained in Chap. 22.


Neural Activity Statistical Parametric Mapping Mental Operation Hemodynamic Response Function fMRI Experiment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Atlas SW, Howard 2nd RS, Maldjian J, Alsop D, Detre JA, Listerud J, et al. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of regional brain activity in patients with intracerebral gliomas: findings and implications for clinical management. Neurosurgery. 1996;38(2):329–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Detre JA, Alsop DC, Aguirre GK, Sperling MR. Coupling of cortical and thalamic ictal activity in human partial epilepsy: demonstration by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Epilepsia. 1996;37(7):657–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Esteller R, Echauz J, D’Alessandro M, et al. Continuous energy variation during the seizure cycle: towards an on-line accumulated energy. Clin Neurophysiol. 2005;116:517–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schiff ND, Rodriguez-Moreno D, Kamal A, et al. fMRI reveals large-scale network activation in minimally conscious patients. Neurology. 2005;64(3):514–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Haxby JV, Gobbini MI, Furey ML, Ishai A, Schouten JL, Pietrini P. Distributed and overlapping representations of faces and objects in ventral temporal cortex. Science. 2001;293:2425–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fox MD, Raichle ME. Spontaneous fluctuations in brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007;8:700–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Buchel C, Friston KJ. Assessing interactions among neuronal systems using functional neuroimaging. Neural Netw. 2000;13:871–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Price CJ, Friston KJ. Cognitive conjunctions: a new experimental design for fMRI. Neuroimage. 1997;5:261–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sternberg S. Separate modifiability, mental modules, and the use of pure and composite measures to reveal them. Acta Psycholoia. 2001;106:147–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Aguirre GK, Mattar MG, Magis-Weinberg L. de Bruijn cycles for neural decoding. Neuroimage. 2011;56:1293–300.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grill-Spector K, Malach R. fMR-adaptation: a tool for studying the functional properties of human cortical neurons. Acta Psychol. 2001;107:293–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Aguirre GK, Zarahn E, et al. The variability of human BOLD hemodynamic responses. Neuroimage. 1998;8:360–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    D’Esposito M, Zarahn E, et al. The effect of normal aging on coupling of neural activity to the BOLD hemodynamic response. Neuroimage. 1999;10(1):6–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Worsley KJ, Friston KJ. The analysis of fMRI time-series revisted-again. Neuroimage. 1995;2:173–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Detre JA, Alsop DC. Perfusion fMRI with arterial spin labeling. Functional MRI. In: Bandettini PA, Moonen C. Berlin: Springer Verlag. 1999. p. 47–62.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Aguirre GK, Detre JA, Zarahn E, Alsop DC. Experimental design and the relative sensitivity of BOLD and perfusion fMRI. Neuroimage. 2002;15:488–500.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Friston KJ, Zarahn E, et al. Stochastic designs in event-related fMRI. Neuroimage. 1999;10:607–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Liu T. Efficiency, power, and entropy in event-related fMRI with multiple trial types. Part II: design of experiments. Neuroimage. 2004;21:401–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zarahn E, Aguirre GK, et al. A trial-based experimental design for fMRI. Neuroimage. 1997;6(2):122–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Menon RS, Luknowsky DC, et al. Mental chronometry using latency-resolved functional MRI. Proc Nat Acad science, USA. 1998;95:10902–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Henson RNA, Price CJ, et al. Detecting latency differences in event-related BOLD responses: application to words versus nonwords and initial versus repeated face presentations. Neuroimage. 2002;15:83–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Engel SA, Rumelhart DE, et al. fMRI of human visual cortex [letter] [published erratum appears in Nature 1994 Jul 14;370(6485):106]. Nature. 1994;369(6481):525.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sereno MI, Dale AM, et al. Borders of multiple visual areas in humans revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging [see comments]. Science. 1995;268(5212):889–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    McIntosh AR, Bookstein FL, et al. Spatial pattern analysis of functional brain images using partial least squares. Neuroimage. 1996;3: 143–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Glover GH, Li TQ, Ress D. Image-based method for retrospective correction of physiological motion effects in fMRI: RETROICOR. Magn Reson Med. 2000;44:162–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Aguirre GK, Zarahn E, et al. The inferential impact of global signal covariates in functional neuroimaging analyses. Neuroimage. 1998;8(3):302–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nichols TE, Holmes AP. Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: a primer with examples. Hum Brain Mapp. 2002;15:1–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nichols T, Hayasaka K. Controlling the familywise error rate in functional neuroimaging: a comparative review. Stat Meth Med Res. 2003;12(5):419–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of NeurologyHospital of the University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations