Advertisement

A Theoretical Information Processing-Based Approach to Basal Ganglia Function

  • Mandar Jog
  • Dorian Aur
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Behavioral Biology book series (ABBI, volume 58)

Abstract

This chapter presents an information processing approach to basal ganglia function. Concepts that build the understanding of information processing utilize published experimental work that shows how information within a network can be represented even as far down as the ionic flux. Ionic flux that results in and from action potentials is shown to be a carrier of information flow within a neuronal network. This flux can organize during behavior and can represent behavioral changes that occur within a striatal network during the acquisition of a learning task. The present chapter further develops the idea of this adaptation to the abrupt behavioral learning seen in striatal neurons. A hypothesis that then attempts to synthesize these ideas into a more system level understanding of basal ganglia function and dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease is put forward.

Keywords

Basal Ganglion Action Plan Ionic Flux Charge Flow Electrical Flow 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abbruzzese G and Berardelli A (2003) Sensorimotor integration in movement disorders. Mov Disord 18: 231–240.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander GE and Crutcher MD (1990) Functional architecture of basal ganglia circuits: neural substrates of parallel processing. Trends Neurosci 13: 266–271.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Almeida QJ, Wishart LR and Lee TD (2003) Disruptive influences of a cued voluntary shift on coordinated movement in Parkinson’s disease. Neuropsychologia 41: 442–452.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Aur D and Jog MS (2006) Building spike representation in tetrodes. J Neurosci Methods 157: 364–373.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Aur D and Jog MS (2007a) Neuronal spatial learning, Neural Process Lett 25: 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Aur D and Jog MS (2007b) Reading the neural code: What do spikes mean for behavior? Nat Precedings. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/npre.2007.61.1
  7. Aur D, Connolly CI and Jog MS (2005) Computing spike directivity with tetrodes. J Neurosci Methods 149: 57–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bar-Gad I and Bergman H (2001) Stepping out of the box: Information processing in the neural networks of the basal ganglia. Curr Opin Neurobiol 11: 689–695.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Barnes TD, Kubota Y, Hu D, Jin DZ and Graybiel AM (2005) Activity of striatal neurons reflects dynamic encoding and recoding of procedural memories. Nature 437: 1158–1161.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Berardelli A, Rothwell JC, Thompson PD, Hallett M (2001) Pathophysiology of bradykinesia in Parkinson’s disease. Brain 124: 2131–2146.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Helmchen F, Svoboda K and Tank DW (1999) In vivo dendritic calcium dynamics in deep-layer cortical pyramidal neurons. Nat Neurosci 2: 989–996.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Jenkins IH, Brooks DJ, Nixon PD, Frackowiak RSJ and Passingham RE (1994) Motor sequence learning: A study with positron emission tomography. J Neurosci 14: 3775–3790.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Jog MS, Kubota YK, Connolly CI, Hillegaart V and Graybiel AM (1999) Building neural representations of habits. Science 286: 1745–1749.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Jog MS, Connolly CI, Kubota Y, Iyengar DR, Garrido L, Harlan R and Graybiel AM (2002) Tetrode technology: Advances in implantable hardware, neuroimaging, and data analysis techniques. J Neurosci Methods 117: 141–152.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Jog MS, Aur D, Connolly C (2007) Is there a tipping point in neuronal ensemble during learning? Neurosci Lett 412: 39–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Johnson AM, Vernon PA, Almeida QJ, Grantier LL and Jog MS (2003) A role of the basal ganglia in movement: The effect of precues on discrete bi-directional movements in Parkinson’s disease. Motor Control 7: 71–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Mink JW (1996) The basal ganglia: Focused selection and inhibition of competing motor programs. Prog Neurobiol 50: 318–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mirenowicz J and Schultz W (1996) Preferential activation of midbrain dopamine neurons by appetitive rather than aversive stimuli. Nature 379: 449–451.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Schultz W, Apicella P and Ljungberg T (1993) Responses of monkey dopamine neurons to reward and conditioned stimuli during successive steps of learning a delayed response task. J Neurosci 13: 900–913.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Schultz W, Romo R, Ljungberg T, Mirenowicz J, Hollerman JR and Dickinson A (1995) Reward-related signals carried by dopamine neurons. In: Houk JC, Davis JL and Beiser DG (Eds) Models of Information Processing in the Basal Ganglia. MIT, Cambridge, MA, pp. 233–248.Google Scholar
  21. Shannon CE and Weaver W (1949) The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press, Champaign, IL.Google Scholar
  22. Spencer L, Smith JW and Otis TS (2004) An ultra small array of electrodes for stimulating multiple inputs into a single neuron. J Neurosci Methods 133: 109–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Stewart GW 1993) On the early history of the singular value decomposition. SIAM Rev 35: 551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Takahashi S, Anzai Y and Sakurai Y (2003) A new approach to spike sorting for multi-neuronal activities recorded with a tetrode /how ICA can be practical. Neurosci Res 46: 265–272.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Toth TI and Crunelli V (1999) Solution of the nerve cable equation using Chebyshev approximations. J Neurosci Methods 87: 119–136.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Clinical Neurological SciencesUniversity of Western OntarioLondonCanada

Personalised recommendations