Learning dynamics within the solutions network

  • Stefano Miraglia
  • Andrew Davies


The shift towards the provision of integrated solutions, rather than standalone products or services, is increasingly important to the competitive success of leading companies worldwide. This model of industrial organization involves a customer-centric approach to business. Getting closer to the customer, deeply understanding its needs, and fulfilling them with “allinclusive” offers are essential capabilities of a solutions provider. Such a strategic trend entails a number of organizational changes affecting all the stakeholders involved, both internally and externally with suppliers and customers. As firms develop a new value proposition around, often beyond, their own traditional products or services, new capabilities are generated which reveal fundamental for establishing enduring and far more profitable relationships with customers. These changes offer opportunities of organizational learning, which firms can iteratively explore and exploit in order to gain sustainable competitive advantages.


Organizational Learning Integrate Solution Solution Network Learn Dynamic Core Capability 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Auramo J, Ala-Risku T (2004) Challenges for going downstream. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 8 (4):333–345Google Scholar
  2. Ballantyne D, Varey RJ (2006) Creating value-in-use through marketing interaction: the exchange logic of relating, communicating and knowing. Marketing Theory, 6 (3):335–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bessant J, Tidd J (2007) Innovation and entrepreneurship. John Wiley and Sons, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  4. Ceci F, Prencipe A (2008) Configuring capabilities for integrated solutions: evidence from the IT sector. Industry and Innovation, 15 (3):227–296Google Scholar
  5. Chesbrough H (2004) A failing grade for the innovation academy. Financial Times, September 24thGoogle Scholar
  6. Cova B, Salle R (2000) Rituals in managing extrabusiness relationships in international project marketing: a conceptual framework. International Business Review, 9 (6):669–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davies A, Brady T (2000) Organisational capabilities and learning in complex product systems: toward repeatable solutions. Research Policy, 29:931–953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davies A, Brady T, Hobday M (2006) Charting a path toward integrated solutions. MIT Sloan Management Review, 47 (3):39–48Google Scholar
  9. Davies A, Brady T, Tang P (2003) Delivering integrated solution. Brighton: SPRU-CENTRIM, 1–34Google Scholar
  10. Davies A, Brady T, Hobday M (2007) Organizing for solutions: systems seller vs. systems integrator. Industrial Marketing Management, 36:183–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davies A (2004) Moving base into high-value integrated solutions: a value stream approach. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13 (5):727–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davies A, Hobday M (2005) The business of projects: managing innovation in complex products and systems. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  13. Galbraith JR (2002) Organizing to deliver solutions. Organizational Dynamics, 31 (2):194–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gummesson E (2006) Implementing the marketing concept: from service and value to lean consumption. In: “Invited commentaries on the service-dominant logic by participants in the Otago Forum”. Marketing Theory, 6 (3):289–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hobday M, Davies A, Prencipe A (2005) Systems integration: a core capability of the modern corporation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14(6):1109–1143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kalwani MU, Narayandas N (1995) Long-term manufacturer–supplier relationships: do they pay off for supplier firms? Journal of Marketing, 59:10–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Middleton CJ (1967) How to set up a project organization. Harvard Business Review, March-April, 73–82Google Scholar
  18. Miller D, Hope Q, Eisenstat R, Foote N, Galbraith J (2002) The problem of solutions: balancing clients and capabilities. Business Horizons, March-April, 3–12Google Scholar
  19. Nonaka I, Takeuchi H (1995) The knowledge-creating company. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Pinto JK, Kharbanda OP (1995) Lessons for an accidental profession. Business Horizons, March/April, 41–50Google Scholar
  21. Prencipe A (2003) The business of systems integration. Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rust R (2004) If everything is service, why is this happening now, and what difference does it make? In “Invited commentaries on evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing”. Journal of Marketing, 68:23–24Google Scholar
  23. Rust R (2006) Does the service-dominant logic need to go further? In “Invited commentaries on the service-dominant logic by participants in the Otago forum,” Marketing Theory, 6(3):289–98CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  24. Sandberg R, Werr A (2003) The three challenges of corporate consulting. MIT Sloan Management Review, Spring, 59–66Google Scholar
  25. Tuli KR, Kohli AK, Bharadwaj SG (2007) Rethinking customer solutions: from product bundles to relational processes. Journal of Marketing 71:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Vargo SL, Lusch RF (2004) Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wise R, Baumgartner P (1999) Go downstream: the new profit imperative in manufacturing. Harvard Business Review, 77, September-October, 133–141.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag US 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.PhD Student eBMS, Scuola Superiore ISUFIUniversity of Salento, Campus EcotekneLecceIT
  2. 2.Reader in Innovation ManagementImperial College Business SchoolLondonUK

Personalised recommendations