Advertisement

Support Programs for Entrepreneurship in Spain

A Multiple Case Study
  • David Urbano
  • Nuria Toledano
Chapter
Part of the International Studies in Entrepreneurship book series (ISEN, volume 22)

Abstract

Today there is no doubt about the importance of new firms when it comes to generating wealth, employment, and social welfare (Birch 1979; Storey 1994; Wennekers and Thurik 1999; Reynolds et al. 2002; Carree and Thurik 2003; Parker 2004, among others). Consequently, both governments and researchers have increased their interests in new and small businesses. Currently, in many nations and regions, policymakers are designing support programs to foster entrepreneurship. Additionally, in Europe, increasing attention has been given to the role and nature of SMEs support services (European Commission 2002). At the same time, several authors are analyzing EU and US entrepreneurship policy ( North et al. 2001; Lundström and Stevenson 2001; Audretsch and Thurik 2001; Stevenson and Lundström 2002; Storey 2003; Lambrecht and Pirnay 2005, among others).

In this context, Spain is not an exception. On the one hand, the government is improving regional and local conditions fostering dynamic and innovative new firms. On the other, the increased competences endowed by its autonomous regions in the last few decades have allowed them to develop new support programs for entrepreneurship. Furthermore, intrinsic to the development of support programs for new and small businesses is the growing academic interest to identify the best practices and issues involving the support programs, such as the nature of activities, services, and immediate outcomes.

Keywords

Entrepreneurial Activity Support Program Support Policy Informal Institution Entrepreneurial Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Audretsch, D.B., Thurik, A.R. (2001). What is new about the new economy? Sources of growth in the managed and entrepreneurial economy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(1), 267–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Birch, D.L. (1979). The Job Generation Process. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
  3. Carrasco, M., Toledano, N. (2004). La promoción de nuevas empresas en el medio rural. Análisis de la incidencia del LEADER II en la provincia de Huelva. Revista Española de Estudios Agrosociales y Pesqueros, 202, 199–221.Google Scholar
  4. Carree, M.A., Thurik, A.R. (2003). The impact of entrepreneurship on economic growth. In D.B. Audretsch and Z.J. Acs (Eds.), Handbook of EntrepreneurshipEntrepreneurship Research (pp. 437–471). Boston: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  5. Corbett, A.C., Neck, H.M., DeTienne, D.R. (2007). How corporate entrepreneurs learn from fledgling innovation initiatives: cognition and the development of a termination script. Entrepreneurship , Theory and Practice, 31(6), 829–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Díaz, C., Urbano, D., Hernández, R. (2005). Teoría económica institucional y creación de empresas. Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 11(3), 209–230.Google Scholar
  7. Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.Google Scholar
  8. European Commission. (2002). Good practice in business support measures, Enterprise division, http://forum.europa.eu.int/irc/sme. Accessed 15 June 2007.
  9. Fonfria, A. (2001). Instrumentos y objetivos de las políticas de apoyo a las PYMEs en España. Madrid: Instituto de Estudios Fiscales.Google Scholar
  10. Glaser, B., Strauss, A. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Strategies of Qualitative Research. London: Wiedenfeld and Nicholson.Google Scholar
  11. Godel, S. (2000). Klaus B: the success story of an entrepreneur: a case study. European Journal of Work and Organization Psychology, 9(1), 89–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lambrecht, J., Pirnay, F. (2005). An evaluation of public support measures for private external consultancies to SMEs in the Wallon Region of Belgium. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 17, 89–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Leung, A., Zhang, J., Wong, P.K., Foo, M.D. (2006). The use of networks in human resource acquisition for entrepreneurial firms: multiple “fit” considerations. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(5), 664–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lundström, A., Stevenson, L. (2001). Entrepreneurship Policy for the Future, Vol. 1 of the entrepreneurship for the future series. Sweden: Swedish Foundation for Small Business Research, Swedish Ministry of Industry, Employment and Communications, NUTEK, and the Örebro University.Google Scholar
  15. Neergard, H., Ulhøi, J.P. (2006). Government agency and trust in the formation and transformation of interorganizational entrepreneurial networks. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(4), 519–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. North, D.C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. North, D.C. (2005). Understanding the Process of Economic Change. Princeton: Princenton University Press.Google Scholar
  18. North, D., Smallbone, D., Vickers, I. (2001). Public sector support for innovating SMEs. Small Business Economics, 4, 303–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Parker, S.C. (2004). The Economics of Self-Employment and Entrepreneurship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. Reynolds, P., Bygrave, W., Erkko, A.L., Hay, M. (2002). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2002 Summary Report. Babson Park, MA: Babson College, Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation and the London Business School.Google Scholar
  22. Rialp, A., Rialp, J., Urbano, D., Vaillant, Y. (2005). The born-global phenomenon: a comparative case study research. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 3, 133–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Stake, R.E. (1994). Case studies. In N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 236–247). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Stevenson, L., Lundström, A. (2002). Beyond the Rhetoric: Defining Entrepreneurship Policy and Its Best Practice Components. Sweden: Swedish Foundation for Small Business Research. Swedish Ministry of Industry, Employment and Communications, NUTEK, and the Örebro University.Google Scholar
  25. Storey, D.J. (1994). Employment. In D.J. Storey (Ed.). Understanding the Small Business Sector (pp.160–203). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Storey, D.J. (2003). Entrepreneurship, small and medium sized enterprises and public policy. In Z.J. Acs and D.B. Audretsch (Eds.). International Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  27. Toledano, N. (2003). Análisis de las políticas de desarrollo rural en la provincia de Huelva. Un estudio comparado de la iniciativa Leader II, el programa Proder y el programa Escuela de Empresas. Málaga: Analistas Económicos de Andalucía & Fundación Unicaja.Google Scholar
  28. Toledano, N., Urbano, D. (2007). Políticas de apoyo a la creación de empresas en España: un estudio de casos. Boletín Económico del ICE, 2905, 33–46.Google Scholar
  29. Urbano, D. (2003). Marco institucional forma de la creación de empresas en Cataluña: oferta y demanda de servicios de apoyo. In E. Generesca, D. Urbano, J.L. Capelleras, C. Guallarte, J. Verges (Eds.) Creación de Empresas – Entrepreneurship. Barcelona: Servicio de publicaciones de la Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona.Google Scholar
  30. Urbano, D. (2006). New Business Creation in Catalonia: Support Measures and Attitudes Towards Entrepreneurship. Barcelona: Generalitat de Catalunya.Google Scholar
  31. Urbano, D., Toledano, N. (2007). El estudio de casos como estrategia de investigación en creación de empresas: cuestiones preliminares. Revista OIKOS, 24, 135–160.Google Scholar
  32. Urbano, D., Vaillant Y.Vaillant, Toledano, N. (2007). Nuevas empresas e instituciones de apoyo: el caso de la promoción empresarial en los ámbitos rurales y urbanos de Cataluña. Revista Española de Estudios Agrosociales y Pesqueros, 214, 103–126.Google Scholar
  33. Wennekers, S., Thurik, R. (1999). Linking entrepreneurship and economic Growth. Small Business Economics, 13, 27–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yin, R.K. (1994). Case Study Research. Design and Methods. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Business Economics DepartmentAutonomous University of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations