Situational Crime Prevention: Theoretical Background and Current Practice

  • Ronald V. Clarke
Part of the Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research book series (HSSR)

Situational crime prevention is quite different from most other criminological approaches to crime control. Proceeding from an analysis of the settings giving rise to specific kinds of crime or disorder, it seeks to introduce discrete managerial and environmental changes that will reduce the opportunities or incentives for crime. Thus, it is focused on the settings in which crimes occur, rather than on those committing criminal acts. It does not try to eliminate criminal tendencies by arresting and sanctioning offenders or by improving society or its institutions. Rather, it seeks to make crime less attractive and it operates, not through the criminal justice system, but through a host of public and private organizations and agencies – schools, hospitals, transit systems, shops and malls, manufacturing businesses and phone companies, local parks and entertainment facilities, pubs and parking lots – whose products, services, and operations spawn opportunities and incentives for a vast range of different crimes.


Crime Prevention Crime Control Routine Activity Theory Situational Crime Prevention Anticipatory Benefit 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Armitage, R., & Smithson, H. (2007). Alley-gating revisited: The sustainability of residents’ satisfaction. Internet Journal of Criminology, 1–38.Google Scholar
  2. Ayres, I., & Levitt, S.D. (1998). Measuring positive externalities from unobservable victim precaution: An empirical analysis. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, February, 43–77.Google Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (1976). Social learning analysis of aggression. In E. Ribes-Inesta & A. Bandura (Eds.), Analysis of delinquency and aggression (pp. 203–232). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.Google Scholar
  4. Blais, E., & Bacher, J-L. (2007). Situational deterrence and claim padding: Results from a randomized field experiment. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 3(4), 337–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blumstein, A., & Wallman, J. (2000). The crime drop in America. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Boruch, R., May, H., Turner, H., Lavenberg, J., Petrosino, A., De Moya, D., et al. (2004). Estimating the effects of interventions that are deployed in many places: Place-randomized trials. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(5), 608–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bowers, K., & Johnson, S. (2003). Measuring the geographical displacement and diffusion of benefit effects of crime prevention activity. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 19(3), 275–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bowers, K., Johnson, S., & Hirschfield, A. (2004). Closing off opportunities for crime: An evaluation of alley-gating. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 10, 285–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brantingham, P. L., & Brantingham, P. J. (1993). Environment, routine and situation: Toward a pattern theory of crime. In R. V. Clarke & M. Felson (Eds.), Routine activity and rational choice (pp. 259–294). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press.Google Scholar
  10. Chaiken, J. M., Lawless, M. W., & Stevenson, K. A. (1974). The impact of police activity on crime: Robberies on the New York City subway system (Report No. R-1424-N.Y.C.) Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.Google Scholar
  11. Clarke, R. V. (1980). Situational crime prevention: Theory and practice. British Journal of Criminology, 20, 136–147.Google Scholar
  12. Clarke, R. V. (1999). Hot products: Understanding, anticipating and reducing the demand for stolen goods (Police Research Series, Paper 98). London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  13. Clarke, R. V. (2008). Situational prevention. In R. Wortley, & L. Mazerolle (Eds.), Environmental criminology and crime analysis. Cullompton, UK: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  14. Clarke, R. V., & Cornish, D. B. (1982). Crime control in Britain. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  15. Clarke, R. V., & Cornish, D. B. (1985). Modeling offenders’ decisions: A framework for research and policy. In M. Tonry & N. Morris (Eds.), Crime and justice (Vol. 6, pp. 147–185). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  16. Clarke, R. V., Kemper, R., & Wyckoff, L. (2001). Controlling cell phone fraud in the US: Lessons for the UK ‘Foresight’ prevention initiative. Security Journal, 14, 7–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Clarke, R. V., & Newman, G. R. (2005). Modifying criminogenic products: What role for government? In R. V. Clarke & G. R. Newman (Eds.), Crime prevention studies: Vol. 18. Designing out crime from products and systems (pp. 7–84). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
  18. Clarke, R. V., & Newman, G. R. (2006). Outsmarting the terrorists. Westport, CT: Preager Security International.Google Scholar
  19. Clarke, R. V., & Weisburd, D. (1994). Diffusion of crime control benefits: Observations on the reverse of displacement. In R. V. Clarke (Ed.), Crime prevention studies (Vol. 2, pp. 165–183). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
  20. Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cornish, D. B. (1994). The procedural analysis of offending, and its relevance for situational prevention. In R. V. Clarke (Ed.), Crime prevention studies (Vol. 3, pp. 151–196). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
  22. Cornish, D. B., & Clarke R. V. (Eds.). (1986). The reasoning criminal: Rational choice perspectives on offending. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  23. Cornish, D. B., & Clarke, R. V. (2003). Opportunities, precipitators and criminal decisions. In M. J. Smith & D. B. Cornish (Eds.), Crime prevention studies (Vol. 16, pp. 41–96). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press. (accessible at Scholar
  24. Decker, S. H. (2005). Using offender interviews to inform police problem solving. Problem-oriented guides for police (Problem Solving Tools Series, No. 3). Office of Community Oriented Policing Services. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Justice. (accessible at
  25. Eck, J., Clarke, R. V., & Guerette, R. (2007). Risky facilities: Crime concentrations in homogeneous sets of establishments and facilities. In Graham Farrell et al. (Eds.), Crime prevention studies: Vol. 21. Imagination for crime prevention (pp. 225–264). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press. (accessible at Scholar
  26. Ekblom, P. (1988). Preventing post office robberies in London: Effects and side effects. Journal of Security Administration, 11, 36–43.Google Scholar
  27. Ekblom, P. (1995). Less crime, by design. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 539, 114–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ekblom, P. (1997). Gearing up against crime: A dynamic framework to help designers keep up with the adaptive criminal in a changing world. International Journal of Risk, Security and Crime Prevention, 2/4, 249–265.Google Scholar
  29. Ekblom, P., & Tilley, N. (2000). Going equipped: Criminology, situational crime prevention and the resourceful offender. British Journal of Criminology, 40, 376–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Farrell, G., & Pease, K. (1993). Once bitten, twice bitten: Repeat victimisation and its implications for crime prevention (Crime Prevention Unit Series, Paper 46, Police Research Group). London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  31. Farrell, G., Tilley, N., Tseloni, A., & Mailley, J. (2008). The crime drop and the security hypothesis. British society of criminology Newsletter, 62, 17–21.Google Scholar
  32. Farrington, D. P., Langan, P. A., & Tonry, M. (Eds.). (2004). Cross national studies in crime and justice.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar
  33. Felson, M. (2002). Crime and everyday life (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar
  34. Felson, M., & Clarke, R. V. (1998). Opportunity makes the thief: Practical theory for crime prevention (Police Research Series, Paper 98). London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  35. Hakim, S., Gaffney, M. A., Rengert, G., & Shachmurove, J. (1995). Costs and benefits of alarms to the community: Burglary patterns and security measures in Tredyffrin township, Pennsylvania. Security Journal, 6, 197–204.Google Scholar
  36. Hesseling, R. B. P. (1994). Displacement: A review of the empirical literature. In R. V. Clarke (Ed.), Crime prevention studies: Vol. 3 (pp. 197–230). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
  37. Jeffery, C. R. (1971). Crime prevention through environmental design. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  38. Levi, M. (2008). Combating identity and other forms of payment fraud in the UK: An analytical history. In M. M. McNally & G. R. Newman (Eds.), Crime prevention studies: Vol. 23. Perspectives on identity theft (pp. 111–132). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
  39. Martinson, R. (1974). What works? – Questions and answers about prison reform. The Public Interest, 35(Spring), 22–54.Google Scholar
  40. Masuda, B. (1992). Displacement vs. diffusion of benefits and the reduction of inventory losses in a retail environment. Security Journal, 3, 131–136.Google Scholar
  41. Mayhew, P. M., Clarke, R. V. G., Sturman, A., & Hough, J. M. (1976). Crime as opportunity (Home Office Research Study, No. 34). London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
  42. McNally, M., & Newman, G. R. (Eds.). (2008). Crime prevention studies: Vol. 23. Perspectives on identity theft. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
  43. Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  44. Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  45. Morgan, R., & Clarke, R. V. (2006). Legislation and unintended consequences for crime. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 12, 189–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Newman, G. R., & Clarke, R. V. (2003). Superhighway robbery: Preventing E-commerce crime. Cullompton, UK: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  47. Newman, O. (1972). Defensible space: Crime prevention through urban design. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  48. Painter, K., & Farrington, D. P. (1997). The crime reducing effect of improved street lighting: The Dudley project. In R. V. Clarke (Ed.), Situational crime prevention: Successful case studies (2nd ed., pp. 209–226). Albany, NY: Harrow and Heston.Google Scholar
  49. Pease, K. (1991). The Kirkholt project: Preventing burglary on a British public housing estate. Security Journal, 2, 73–77.Google Scholar
  50. Poyner, B. (1991). Situational prevention in two car parks. Security Journal, 2, 96–101.Google Scholar
  51. Poyner, B., & Webb, B. (1991). Crime free housing. Oxford, UK: Butterworth Architect.Google Scholar
  52. Scherdin, M. J. (1986). The halo effect: Psychological deterrence of electronic security systems. Information Technology and Libraries, September, 232–235.Google Scholar
  53. Scottish Central Research Unit. (1995). Running the red: An evaluation of the Strathclyde police red light camera initiative. Edinburgh: The Scottish Office.Google Scholar
  54. Sherman, L., Gartin, P., & Buerger, M. (1989). Hot spots of predatory crime: Routine activities and the criminology of place. Criminology, 27, 27–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Simon, H. (1978). Rationality as process and product of thought. American Economic Review, 8(21), 1–11.Google Scholar
  56. Sinclair, I. A. C., & Clarke, R. V. G. (1982). Predicting, treating and explaining delinquency: The lessons from research on institutions. In P. Feldman (Ed.), Developments in the study of criminal behavior: Vol. 1. The prevention and control of offending (pp. 51–78). London and New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  57. Smith, M. J., Clarke, R. V., & Pease, K. (2002). Anticipatory benefits in crime prevention. In N. Tilley (Ed.), Crime prevention studies: Vol. 13. Analysis for crime prevention (pp. 71–88). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
  58. Stanford Research Institute. (1970). Reduction of robbery and assault of bus drivers: Vol III. Technological and operational methods. Stanford, CA: Stanford Research Institute.Google Scholar
  59. Sykes, G., & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22, 664–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Taylor, I., Walton, P., & Young, J. (1973). The new criminology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tilley, N. (2005). Crime prevention and system design. In N. Tilley (Ed.), Handbook of crime prevention and community safety (pp. 266–293). Cullompton, UK: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  62. Tilley, N., Robinson, A., & Burrows, J. (2007). The investigation of high volume crime. In T. Newburn, T. Williamson, & A. Wright (Eds.), Handbook of criminal investigation (pp. 226–254). Cullompton, UK: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  63. Van de Bunt, H., & van der Schoot, C. (2003). Prevention of organised crime: A situational approach (WODC Report 215). The Hague: Dutch Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
  64. von Hirsch, A., Garland, D., & Wakefield, A. (Eds.). (2000). Ethical and social issues in situational crime prevention. Oxford: Hart Publications.Google Scholar
  65. Webb, B. (1994). Steering column locks and motor vehicle theft: evaluations from three countries. In R. V. Clarke (Ed.), Crime prevention studies: Vol. 2 (pp. 71–90). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
  66. Wilkinson, P. (1986). Terrorism and the liberal state (2nd ed.). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Wortley, R. (2001). A classification of techniques for controlling situational precipitators of crime. Security Journal, 14, 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wortley, R. (2002). Situational prison control: Crime prevention in correctional institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wortley, R., & Smallbone, S. (2006). Crime prevention studies: Vol. 19. Situational prevention of child sexual abuse. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press. (accessible at Scholar
  70. Zimbardo, P. G. (1973). A field experiment in auto-shaping. In C. Ward (Ed.), Vandalism (pp. 85–90). London: Architectural Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ronald V. Clarke
    • 1
  1. 1.Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyNewarkUSA

Personalised recommendations