Optimizing Resilience in the 21st Century

  • Mary Hamil Parker


An individual’s capacity to achieve, retain or regain a level of physical or emotional health after illness or loss may find support from new technologies for health care communication. Twenty-first century technologies also may fulfill additional components of resilience related to social functioning, morale, and bodily health – providing pleasurable activities and maintenance of contact with the world outside for those home or bed bound by illness or disability. Willingness to use technology may involve psychological factors such as receptivity, self-efficacy, and motivation, expressed in planning or acquisition of technologies for future needs or for future frailty.


Personal Health Record Assisted Living Senior Center Defense Advance Research Project Agency Small Business Innovation Research 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Alwan, M., Dalal, S., Mack, D., Kell, S., Turner, B., Leachtenauer, J., Felder, R. (2006), Impact of monitoring technology in assisted living: Outcome Pilot, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, 10(1), 192–198.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Astell, A. (2005) Developing technology for people with dementia, Psychiatric Times, XXII, 13. Available at
  3. Barrett, L.L. (2008) ‘Healthy @ Home’, AARP Knowledge Management. Available at (Retrieved January 15, 2010).
  4. Beach, S., Schultz, R., Downs, J., Matthews, J., Barron, B., Seelman, K. (2009). Disability, age, and informational privacy attitudes in quality of life technology applications: results from a national Web survey, ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (TACCESS), 2, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blaschke, C.M., Freddolino, P., Mullen, E. (2009) Ageing and technology: a review of the research literature, British Journal of Social Work, 39(4), 641–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Charness, N., Boot, W.R. (2009) Aging and information technology use: potential and barriers, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(5), 253–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Churchill, R. (2009) Stevie wonder speaks at the annual consumer electronics show in Las Vegas, MSNBC News, 1/9/09.Google Scholar
  8. Dibner, A.S. (1985). Effect of personal emergency response system on hospital use. Watertown, MA: Lifeline Systems, Inc.Google Scholar
  9. Dishman, E., Carrillo, M.C. (2007) Perspective on everyday technologies for Alzheimer’s care: research findings, directions, and challenges. Alzheimer’s & Dementia, 3, 227–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Edlich, R., Haines, M. (2009) Scientific Basis for Selection of Personal Emergency Response Systems. Available at (Retrieved January 27, 2010).
  11. Fallis, W., Silverthorne, D., Franklin, J., McClement, S. (2007) Client and responder perceptions of a personalized emergency response system: lifeline, Home Health Care Services Quarterly, 26(3), 1–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Glascock, A.P., Kutzik, D.M. (2009) The impact of behavioral monitoring technology on the provision of health care in the home, Journal of Universal Computer Science, 12(1), 59–79.Google Scholar
  13. Hoenig, H., Sanford, J., et al. (2006) Development of a tele-technology protocol for in-home rehabilitation, Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, 43(2), 287–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hollinger-Smith, L. (2009) It’s Never 2 Late Program Evaluation for The Green House® Project Available at Scholar
  15. Hyer, K., Rudnick, L. (1994) The effectiveness of personal emergency response systems in meeting the safety monitoring needs of home care clients, Journal of Nursing Administration, 24(6), 39–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Internet User Profiles Reloaded: Updated Demographics for Internet, Broadband and Wireless Users, January 5, 2010, Pew Research Center Publications. Available at (Retrieved January 15, 2010).
  17. Lade, D. (2009) Officials issue alert on personal emergency response systems, AARP Bulletin Today. October 30, 2009,…/2009 (Retrieved January 28, 2010).Google Scholar
  18. Meade, C. (2008) eNeighbor technology and its effect on Senior Living – a primary research study, 11th Annual Zieglar Senior Living Finance + Strategy Conference. Available at
  19. Melenhorst, A., Rogers, W.A., Bouwhuis, D.G. (2006). Older adults’ motivated choice for technological innovation: Evidence for benefit-driven selectivity. Psychology and Aging, 21, 190–195.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Neilsen Six Million More Seniors Using the Web than Five Years Ago December 10, 2009. Available at (Retrieved January 28, 2010).
  21. Parker, M. (2009) Interviews with Leo M. Asen and Selfhelp Services Staff and Residents, July 27, 2009. Telephone interview with Amy Iacch, RN, LNHA, Corporate Clinical Specialist, Lutheran Life Communities, August 4, 2009.Google Scholar
  22. Porter, E.J. (2003) Moments of apprehension in the midst of a certainty: Some frail older widow’s lives with a personal emergency response system, Qual Health Res, 13, 1311–1323.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Raine, L. “Internet,Broadband, and Cell Phone Statistics,” Jan. 5, 2010, Pew Internet and American Life Project. (Retrieved January 28, 2010).Google Scholar
  24. Reily, S. (2009) tech Survey: Boomer Women Are Early Adopters of New Consumer Electronics, Posted on Wednesday, February 25, 2009 (Retrieved January 25, 2010).Google Scholar
  25. Taub, E. (2009) Helping Grandpa Get His Tech On, The New York Times, October 29, 2009, B8. Available at (Retrieved January 28, 2010).
  26. Vance, A. (2009) Insurers Fight Speech-Impairment Remedy, The New York Times, September 15, 2009, 1-A. Available at (Retrieved January 28, 2010).

Copyright information

© Springer New York 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Palliative & Hospice Training, IncOak ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations