• Xingfa Huang
  • Guangyong Li
  • Miao Wang
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 294)


Venturi injector is widely used in fertigation system due to its obvious advantages such as cheap and robust system without mobile pieces, simple structure, convenient to operation, stable performance, needless of external energy for operation etc. At present, the hydraulic parameters such as suction capacity (injection rate) for the most of the Venturi injectors produced domestically are not very desirable. In this paper, CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) method was used to simulate the inner flow field of the Venturi injectors, and the relationships among the structure parameters (i.e., throat length L, throat diameter D, slot diameter Da) and suction capacity q, and the optimal structure sizes of the Venturi injector were analyzed. The results show that when the inlet pressure and the slot position are kept unchanged as the sample one, the suction capacity of Venturi injector increases with the decrease of throat diameter D and throat length L, and the increase of slot diameter Da; while keeping the slot diameter Da, throat diameter D and throat length L unchanged, the suction capacity of Venturi injector q increases with the increase of inlet pressure P. The optimal combination of the structural parameters in this size was selected as follows: throat diameter D=8mm, slot diameter Da=18.5mm, and throat length L=14mm. In this case, the suction capacity of the Venturi injector q=1.203m3/h. The results can provide theoretic support for domestic Venturi injector research, design and manufacturing.


Computational Fluid Dynamics Drip Irrigation Inlet Pressure Drip Irrigation System Throat Diameter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Bhattarai S P, Huber S, Midmore D J. Aerated subsurface irrigation water gives growth and yield benefits to Zucchini, vegetable soybean and cotton in heavy clay soils. Annals of Applied Biology, 2004, 144 (3): 285–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bracy R P, Parish R L, Rosendale RM. Fertigation uniformity affected by injector type. Hort Technology, 2003, 13 (1): 103–105Google Scholar
  3. Chen Zuobing, Dou Haijian, Chen Siwei, et al. Numerical research on flow field of Venturi Tube. China Cement, 2005, (4): 61–63 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  4. Harris G A. Sub-surface drip irrigation – Advantages and Limitations, DPI&F Note, Brisbane, 2005Google Scholar
  5. He Shaohua, Wen Zhuqing, Lou Tao. Experiment Design and Data Process. Beijing: National Defence Scientech University Press, 2002: 67–69 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  6. Jiusheng Li, R.E. Yoder, J. Zhang. Simulation of nitrate distribution under drip irrigation using artificial neural networks. Irrigation Science, 2004, 23: 29–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Johnson A W, Young J R, Thereadgill E D, . Chemigation for crop production management. Plant Disease. 1986, 70(11): 998–1004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Li Baijun, Mao Hanping, Li Kai. Study on the parallel connected Venturi injectors and their parameters selection. Drainage and Irrigation Machinery. 2001, 19(1): 42–45 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  9. Li jiusheng, Zhang jianjun, Xue Kezong. Drip Irrigation Principals for Fertigation and Its Applications. Beijing: Beijing Agricultural Scientech Press, 2003: 10–24 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  10. Li Yongxin, Li Guangyong, Qiu Xiangyu, et al. Numerical Simulation to the inner flow field of labyrinth type drip with CFD models. 6th National Micro Irrigation Congress. 2004: 275–282 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  11. Manzano Juárez J, Palau Salvador G. Hydraulic Modeling of Venturi Injector by Means of CFD. 2005 ASAE Annual International Meeting, paper No. 052070, Tampa Convention Center, Tampa, Florida, U.S.A., 17 – 20 July 2005Google Scholar
  12. Sha Yi, Hou Sujuan. Experimental study on parallel connected Venturi injectors. Irrigation and Drainage Machinery, 1995, (2): 37–39 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  13. Shen Xuemin, Feng Jun, Zhang Xuejun. Performance research on Venturi injector in sprinkler irrigation system. Water Saving Irrigation, 2001, (1): 20–21 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  14. Shen Xuemin. Introduction to the 100PS-1 Venturi Injector in Sprinkler Irrigation System. Water Saving Irrigation, 2000, (11): 14–15 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  15. Wang Fujun. Analyze to CFD(Computational Fluid Dynamics). Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2004: 1–259 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  16. Yuan Z, Choi C Y, Waller P M, Colaizzi P. Effects of liquid temperature and viscosity on Venturi injectors. Transactions of the ASAE, 2000, 43 (6): 1441–1447Google Scholar
  17. Yuan Zhifa, Zhou Jingyu. Experiment Design and Analyze. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2000: 292–296 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  18. Zhao Jingcheng, Ren Xiaoli. Sprinkler Engineering Technology. Beijing: China Water Conservation and Hydraulic Electricity Power Publish Press, 1999(in Chinese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.China Agricultural UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations