Skip to main content

The Application of Structurally Dynamic Models in Ecology and Ecotoxicology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ecotoxicology Modeling

Part of the book series: Emerging Topics in Ecotoxicology ((ETEP,volume 2))

Abstract

Structurally dynamic models (SDMs) are models that account for the changes in the model parameters due to the adaptation or the shift in species composition resulting from current changes in the forcing functions. The parameter changes are found by introduction of eco-exergy as goal function in the model. The set of parameters that give the highest eco-exergy by the prevailing conditions are currently selected. The theory behind the use of eco-exergy as goal function in ecological models is presented as a translation of Darwin’s theory to thermodynamics. Two examples of SDMs are presented to illustrative the advantages and disadvantages of this model type.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Straskraba M (1979) Natural control mechanisms in models of aquatic ecosystems. Ecol Model 6: 305–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Straskraba M (1980) The effects of physical variables on freshwater production: Analyses based on models. In: Le Cren ED, McConnell RH (eds) The Functioning of freshwater ecosystems (International Biological Programme 22), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jørgensen SE (2002) Integration of ecosystem theories: A pattern, 3rd edition. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  4. Stenseth NC (1986) Darwinian evolution in ecosystems: A survey of some ideas and difficulties together with some possible solutions. In: Casti JL, Karlquist A (eds) Complexity, language and life: Mathematical approaches, Springer Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  5. Patten BC (1997) Synthesis of chaos and sustainability in a nonstationary linear dynamic model of the American black bear (Ursus americanus Pallas) in the Adirondack Mountains of New York. Ecol Model 100: 11–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jørgensen SE, Svirezhev YM (2005) Towards a thermodynamic theory for ecological systems, Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jørgensen SE, Fath B (2007) A new ecology: A systems approach, Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jørgensen SE, Patten BC, Straskraba M (2000) Ecosystems emerging. IV. Growth. Ecol Model 126: 249–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jørgensen SE, Fath BD (2004) Application of thermodynamic principles in ecology. Ecol Complexity 1: 267–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fath B, Jørgensen SE, Patten BC, Straskraba M (2004) Ecosystem growth and development. Biol Syst 77: 213–228

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jørgensen SE, Meyer HF (1977) Ecological buffer capacity. Ecol Model 3: 39–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jørgensen SE, Mejer HF (1979) A holistic approach to ecological modelling. Ecol Model 7: 169–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jørgensen SE (1992) Development of models able to account for changes in species composition. Ecol Model 62: 195–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Coffaro G, Bocci M, Bendoricchio G (1997) Structural dynamic application to space variability of primary producers in shallow marine water. Ecol Model 102: 97–114

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Grant PR (1986) Ecology and evolution of Darwin’s finches. Reprinted in 1999. Princeton University Press, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kallqvist T, Meadows BS (1978) The toxic effects of copper on algae and rotifers from a soda lake. Water Res 12: 771–775

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hedtke SF (1984) Structure and function of copper-stressed aquatic microcosms. Aquat Toxicol 5: 227–244

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Havens KE (1994) Structural and functional responses of a freshwater community to acute copper stress. Environ Pollut 86: 259–266

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Fu-Liu X, Jørgensen SE, Tao S (1999) Ecological indicators for assessing the freshwater ecosystem health. Ecol Model 116: 77–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Peters RH (1983) The ecological implications of body size, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sven E. Jørgensen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jørgensen, S.E. (2009). The Application of Structurally Dynamic Models in Ecology and Ecotoxicology. In: Devillers, J. (eds) Ecotoxicology Modeling. Emerging Topics in Ecotoxicology, vol 2. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0197-2_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics