How Asia Can Contribute to World Peace Psychology: Creating a Dignified and Peaceful World by Employing Unity in Diversity

  • Evelin Lindner
Part of the Peace Psychology Book Series book series (PPBS)

Kaku (2005), a renowned physicist born in California of Asian background, writes: “The generation now alive is perhaps the most important generation of humans ever to walk the Earth. Unlike previous generations, we hold in our hands the future destiny of our species, whether we soar into fulfilling our promise as a type I civilization (meaning a civilization that succeeds in building a socially and ecologically sustainable world) or fall into the abyss of chaos, pollution, and war” (p. 361).

Peace psychology stands at the very center of the formidable task that Kaku describes for humankind, and it carries an enormous responsibility at this crucial historical moment. What makes peace psychology so important is that it bridges all levels, from the innermost psyche of each individual at the micro-level to the large-scale processes at the highest global macro-level. Christie (2006) explains how peace psychology is distinguished from neighboring fields (e.g., social psychology) through its...


Wild Food Harmonious Society Community Game Global Interdependence Global Terrorism 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Beakley, B., & Ludlow, P. (Eds.) (2006). The philosophy of mind: Classical problems / contemporary issues (5th ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bender, F. L. (2003). The culture of extinction: Toward a philosophy of deep ecology. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books.Google Scholar
  3. Bond, M. H. (1998). Unity in diversity: Orientations and strategies for building a harmonious, multicultural society. Trames, A Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 3, Issue 2234–263.Google Scholar
  4. Bradley, F. H. (1893). Appearance and reality: A metaphysical essay. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, M. A. (2002). Human rights and the borders of suffering: The promotion of human rights in international politics. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Buber, M. (1944). I and Thou. Edinburgh: Clark. (Ich und Du trans.). Leipzig: Infelverlag (Original work published 1923).Google Scholar
  7. Christie, D. J. (2006). What is Peace Psychology the psychology of? Journal of Social Issues, 62, 1–17. Retrieved August 14, 2007, from
  8. Coser, L. A. (1977). Masters of sociological thought: Ideas in historical and social context. (2nd ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  9. Eisler, R. (1987). The chalice and the blade: our history, our future. London: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
  10. Engerman, S. L. & Genovese, E. D. (Eds.). (1975). Race and slavery in the Western hemisphere: Quantitative studies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Friedman, T. L. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  12. Fromm, E. (1976). To have or to be? New York, NY: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  13. Fung, H., & Chen, E. C.-H. (2001). Across time and beyond skin: Self and transgression in the everyday socialization of shame among Taiwanese preschool children. Social Development, 10, 420–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Galtung, J., Jacobsen, C. G., Brand-Jacobsen, K. F., & Tschudi, F. (2000). Searching for peace: The road to TRANSCEND. London: Pluto Press In association with TRANSCEND.Google Scholar
  15. Genovese, E. D. (1975). Roll, Jordan, roll: The world the slaves made. London: Deutsch.Google Scholar
  16. Herz, J. H. (1950). Idealist Internationalism and the security dilemma. World Politics, 2, 157–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ho, D. Y. F. (1976). On the concept of face. American Journal of Sociology, 81, 867–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ide, S. (1989). Formal forms and discernment: Two neglected aspects of universals of linguistic politeness. Multilingua – Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication, 8, 223–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kaku, M. (2005). Parallel worlds: A journey through creation, higher dimensions, and the future of the cosmos. New York, London, Toronto, Sydney, Auckland: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  20. Lambert, R. (2008). Empowering Salafis and Islamists against Al-Qaeda: A London counterterrorism case study. Political Science & Politics, January, 31–35,Google Scholar
  21. Levine, P. A. (1997). Waking the tiger: Healing trauma. Berkeley, CA: North Atlantic Books.Google Scholar
  22. Li, J., & Fischer, K. W. (2004). Thought and affect in American and Chinese learners’ beliefs about learning. In D. Y. Dai & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development. (pp. 385–418) Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  23. Liberman, V., Samuels, S. M., & Ross, L. D. (2004). The name of the game: Predictive power of reputations versus situational labels in determining prisoner’s dilemma game moves. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lindner, E. G. (2002). Healing the cycles of humiliation: How to attend to the emotional aspects of "unsolvable" conflicts and the use of "humiliation entrepreneurship". Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 8, 125–138, available at
  25. Lindner, E. G. (2006). Making enemies: Humiliation and international conflict. Westport, CT, London: Greenwood/Praeger Security International.Google Scholar
  26. Lindner, E. G. (2007a). Avoiding humiliation – From intercultural communication to global interhuman communication. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 10, 21–38.Google Scholar
  27. Lindner, E. G. (2007b). How multicultural discourses can help construct new meaning. Hangzhou, China: Paper prepared for the Second International Conference on Multicultural Discourses, 13–15th April 2007, Institute of Discourse and Cultural Studies, & Department of Applied Psychology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.Google Scholar
  28. Marshall, M. G. (1999). Third world war: System, process, and conflict dynamics. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  29. Matsumoto, D. R. (1988). Reexamination of the universality of Face: Politeness phenomena in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics, 12, 403–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Miller, W. I. (1993). Humiliation and other essays on honor, social discomfort, and violence. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Montiel, C. J. (2003). Peace psychology in Asia. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 9, 195–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Montiel, C. J. (2006). Political psychology of nonviolent democratic transitions in Southeast Asia. Journal of Social Issues, 62, 173–190. Retrieved August 14, 2007, from
  33. Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ross, L. D. & Nisbett, R. E. (1991). The person and the situation: Perspectives of social psychology. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Sharma, C. (2007). The Advaita Tradition in Indian philosophy: A study of Advaita in Buddhism, Vedanta and Kashmir Shaivism. New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers.Google Scholar
  36. Smith, M. M. (1998). Debating slavery: Economy and society in the Antebellum American South. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Ury, W. (1999). Getting to peace. Transforming conflict at home, at work, and in the world. New York, NY: Viking.Google Scholar
  38. Volf, M. (1996). Exclusion and embrace: a theological exploration and identity, otherness, and reconciliation. Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press.Google Scholar
  39. Webb, T. (2005). Working with shame and other strong emotions: Experiential workshop script from ‘personal and political tools for social change’ course. Sidney: Centre for Popular Education, University of Technology.Google Scholar
  40. Wendt, A. (2005). Social theory as cartesian science: An auto-critique from a quantum perspective. In S. Guzzini & A. Leander (Eds.), Constructivism and international relations. New York and London: Routledge, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  41. Wilber, K. (1979). No boundary. Boston, MA: Shambhala.Google Scholar
  42. Wilber, K. (1996). A brief history of everything. Boston, MA: Shambhala.Google Scholar
  43. Winter, D. D. N. (1996). Ecological psychology: Healing the split between planet and self. New York, NY: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  44. Yoshikawa, M. (1980). The "double swing" model of Eastern-Western intercultural communication. Honolulu, Hawaii: Paper prepared for the Seminar on Communication Theory from Eastern and Western Perspectives, East-West Communication Institute.Google Scholar
  45. Yoshikawa, M. (1987). The "double swing" model of intercultural communication between the East and West. In D. L. Kincaid (Ed.), Communication theory: Eastern and Western perspectives. (pp. 319–329) San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Evelin Lindner
    • 1
  1. 1.University of OsloNorway

Personalised recommendations