Advertisement

Human-Technology Interface in Philippine People Power

  • Ma. Regina E. Estuar
  • Cristina J. Montiel
Chapter
Part of the Peace Psychology Book Series book series (PPBS)

Social psychologist Albert Bandura (2001) suggests that new technologies play a major role in changing the very nature of human influence. Bandura further claims that human functioning and technology form a duality in that “the very technologies they create to control their life environment, paradoxically, can become a constraining force that, in turn, controls how they think and behave” (Bandura, 2001, p. 17). Human agency in the form of nonviolent civic engagement has arisen alongside rapid developments in new technologies. In this age of pervasive and ubiquitous computing, peace scholars as well as technology researchers have delved into the relationship between information and communication technologies (ICTs) and their potential role in active nonviolence (Ackerman & Duvall, 2000; Downey & Fenton, 2003; Eng, 1998; Foss & Larkin, 1986; Martin, 2001; Rheingold, 2002; Wilhelm, 2000). Pool (1984) recognized that technologies are not neutral. Weapons of mass destruction and mass...

Keywords

Mobile Phone Social Movement Civic Engagement Open Code Collective Efficacy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abbott, J. (2001). Democracydinternet.asia? The challenges to the emancipatory potential of the net: Lessons from China and Malaysia. Third World Quarterly, 22(1), 99–114.Google Scholar
  2. Ackerman, P., & Duvall, J. (2000). A force more powerful: A century of nonviolent conflict. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  3. Arillo, C. (1986). Breakaway : The inside story of the four-day revolution in the Philippines, February 22–25, 1986. Metro Manila: CTA Research and Publishing.Google Scholar
  4. Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26.Google Scholar
  5. Downey, J., & Fenton, N. (2003). New media, counter publicity and the public sphere. New Media & Society, 15(2), 185–202.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Downing, J. D. (2001). Radical media: Rebellious communication and social movements. California: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  7. Eng, P. (1998). Online activists step up fight: Dissidence is no longer a rag-tag endeavour. Bangkok Post. Retrieved February 1, 2004 from http://www.bangkokpost.net/today/290498News19.html.
  8. Foss, D., & Larkin, R. (1986). Beyond revolution: A new theory of social movements. Massachusetts: Bergin & Garvey Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
  9. Klandermans, B. (1997). The social psychology of protest. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. Lumicao-Santos, A., & Domingo-Robles, L. (1987). Power politics in the Philippines. Quezon City: Center for Social Research.Google Scholar
  11. Martin B Social defense strategy: The role of technology Journal of Peace ResearchCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Martin, B. (2001). Technology for nonviolent struggle. London: War Resisters’ International. Retrieved December 18, 2003 from http://www.gn.apc.org/warresisters/
  13. Pool, I. (1984). Technologies of freedom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Rheingold, H. (2002). Smart mobs: The next social revolution. Cambridge, MA: Persus Publishing.Google Scholar
  15. Simons, L. M. (1987). Worth dying for. New York: William Morrow & Company, Inc.Google Scholar
  16. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1997). Grounded theory in practice. California: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  17. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research. California: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  18. Stuart-Santiago, A. (2000). Walang himala! Himagsikan sa edsa. Quezon City: Foundation for World Wide People Power, Inc.Google Scholar
  19. Tanner, E. (2001). Chilean conversations: Internet forum participants debate Augusto Pinochet’s detention. Journal of Communication, 51, 383–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tarrazona, H. M. (1989). After EDSA: Vol. I. Pasay: Hector M. Tarrazona.Google Scholar
  21. Willhelm, A. G. (2000). Democracy in the digital age: Challenges to political life in cyberspace. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Zhou, S., & Gregory, S. (2003). Jiang Zemin’s personal crusade: Why the Chinese communist party leader moved against Falun Gong and how his anti- Falun Gong campaign has come to dominate his agenda. Retrieved December 18, 2004 from http://faluninfo.net/specialreports/jiangspersonalcrusade.
  23. Zunes, S. (1999). The origins of people power in the Philippines. In E. Zunes, L. R. Kurtz, and S. B. Ascher (Eds.). Nonviolent social movements: A geographical perspective (pp. 129–157). Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ma. Regina E. Estuar
    • 1
  • Cristina J. Montiel
    • 2
  1. 1.Ateneo de Manila UniversityManila
  2. 2.Technical University of ChemnitzGeorgetown UniversityGermany

Personalised recommendations