Increasing IQ in the United States

Part of the The Springer Series on Human Exceptionality book series (SSHE)


Americans tend to feel smug about the health benefits of living in a developed nation, yet a great many people in the United States are too poor to benefit from the advances in medical care that tend to grab the headlines. If tens of millions of people lack medical insurance, then tens of millions will be denied necessary medical treatment. We evaluated 30 medical problems that potentially impair language ability in the United States (Table 9.1), and we concluded that those conditions together may cost the average American child up to 5 IQ points. The problem most likely to result in impaired verbal ability in the United States is rampant poverty that subsumes – and may aggravate – a great many of the other problems that can result from language impairment. Poverty in the United States is associated with an increased risk of virtually all of the other risk factors for language impairment. Children in poverty are at an increased risk of low birth weight, attention deficit disorder, childhood smoking, lead exposure, asthma, PTSD, childhood neglect, iron deficiency anemia, PCB exposure, diabetes, air pollution, childhood abuse, mercury pollution, epilepsy, and so on [1]. This is a disquieting consideration, given that poverty is far more prevalent in the United States than we would like to admit.


Head Start Control Child School Readiness Bell Curve Head Start Program 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Steen, R. G., & Campbell, F. A. (2008). The cognitive impact of systemic illness in childhood and adolescence. In L. Weiss & A. Prifitera (Eds.), WISC-IV: Clinical use and interpretation (pp. 365–407). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    New York Times (2007). Editorial, Counting the poor, New York.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Office of Head Start. (2007). Head Start Program Fact Sheet. Washington, DC: Administration for Children & Families.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Puma, M., et al. (2005). Head Start Impact Study: First Year Findings. In Administration for Children & Families (ed.). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Washington, DC. p. 333.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wasik, B. A., Bond, M. A., & Hindman, A. (2006). The effects of a language and literacy intervention on Head Start children and teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Malofeeva, E., et al. (2004). Construction and evaluation of a number sense test with head Start children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 648–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mantzicopoulos, P. (2003). Flunking kindergarten after Head Start: An inquiry into the contribution of contextual and individual variables. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 268–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gunn, B., et al. (2006). Promoting school success: Developing social skills and early literacy in Head Start classrooms. NHSA Dialog, 9, 1–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (1993). The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment: Confirmation from meta-analysis. American Psychologist, 48, 1181–1209.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Love, J. M., et al. (2005). The effectiveness of Early Head Start for 3-year-old children and their parents: Lessons for policy and programs. Developmental Psychology, 41, 885–901.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    St. Pierre, R. G., Ricciuti, A. E., & Rimdzius, T. A. (2005). Effects of a family literacy program on low-literate children and their parents: Findings from an evaluation of the Even Start Family Literacy Program. Developmental Psychology, 41, 953–970.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Olds, D. L., Sadler, L., & Kitzman, H. (2007). Programs for parents of infants and toddlers: Recent evidence from randomized trials. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48, 355–391.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Martin, S. L., Ramey, C. T., & Ramey, S. (1990). The prevention of intellectual impairment in children of impoverished families: Findings of a randomized trial of educational day care. American Journal of Public Health, 80, 844–847.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Campbell, F. A. (2009). Early childhood interventions: The Abecedarian Project. (in prep.).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Campbell, F. A., et al. (2001). The development of cognitive and academic abilities: Growth curves from an early childhood educational experiment. Developmental Psychology, 37, 231–242.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sattler, J. M. (1992). Assessment of ethnic minority children. In Assessment of Children (pp. 563–596). Jerome M. Sattler, Publisher, Inc.: San Diego.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Campbell, F. A., & Ramey, C. T. (1994). Effects of early intervention on intellectual and academic achievement: A follow-up study of children from low-income families. Child Development, 65, 684–698.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Burchinal, M. R., et al. (1997). Early intervention and mediating processes in cognitive performance of children of low-income African-American families. Child Development, 68, 935–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ramey, C. T., et al. (2000). Persistent effects of early childhood education on high-risk children and their mothers. Applied Developmental Science, 4, 2–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    McLaughlin, A. E., et al. (2007). Depressive symptoms in young adults: The influences of the early home environment and early educational child care. Child Development, 78, 746–756.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Campbell, F. A., et al. (2002). Early childhood education: Young adult outcomes from the Abecedarian Project. Applied Developmental Science, 6, 42–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Behrman, R. E. (ed). (1995). Long-term outcomes of early childhood programs. The future of children, vol. 5(3). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University – The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Waldfogel, J. (1999). Early childhood interventions and outcomes. London: Center for Analysis of Social Exclusion, London School of Economics.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Feder, L. & Clay J.A. (2002) Investing in the future of our children: Building a model community prevention program. Memphis.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Donovan, M. S. & Cross C. T. (2002). Minority Students in Special and Gifted Education. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Committee on Minority Representation in Special Education (ed.) Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wise, S., et al. (2005) The efficacy of early childhood interventions. Australian Government Department of Family and Community Services (ed.) Melbourne, Australia: Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Anderson, M. L. (2005) Uncovering gender differences in the effects of early intervention: A reevaluation of the Abecedarian, Perry Preschool, and Early Training Projects. Social Science Research Network.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hamm, K. & Ewen D. (2006) From the beginning: Early Head Start children, families, staff, and programs in 2004. In Brief C. P. (ed.) Center for Law and Social Policy.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Johnson, D. L. (2006). Parent–Child Development Center follow-up project: Child behavior problem results. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 27, 391.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Garber, H.L., The Milwaukee Project: Preventing Mental Retardation in Children at Risk. (1988). Washington. DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Weikart, D. P., Bond J. T., & McNeil J. T. (1978). The Ypsilanti Perry Preschool Project: Preschool years and longitudinal results through fourth grade. In Monographs of the High Scope Educational Research Foundation. High Scope Press: Ypsilant, MI.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Reynolds, A. J., et al. (2001). Long-term effects of an early childhood intervention on educational achievement and juvenile arrest: a 15-year follow-up of low-income children in public schools. JAMA, 285, 2339–2346.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Palfrey, J. S., et al. (2005). The Brookline Early Education Project: A 25-year follow-up study of a family-centered early health and development intervention. Pediatrics, 116, 144–152.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zigler, E., & Styfco, S. J. (2001). Extended childhood intervention prepares children for school and beyond. JAMA, 285, 2378–2380.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Medical Communications Consultants, LLCChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations