Nanomaterial-Based Piezoelectric Actuators and Sensors

  • Nader Jalili


Due to the unique structure of nanomaterials, improved material properties can be achieved in addition to the added multifunctionality of these materials. Such unique feature is a key factor in the design and development of sensors and actuators comprised of functional nanomaterials. Along this line of reasoning, this chapter presents an overview of advances in nanomaterial-based actuators and sensors utilizing either piezoelectric materials or possessing piezoelectric properties. More specifically, piezoelectric properties of nanotubes are disclosed and detailed, with a natural extension to nanotube-based piezoelectric sensors and actuators. As a byproduct of this arrangement, structural damping becomes possible using nanotube-based composites. As a future pathway toward the development of next-generation sensors and actuators comprised of nanomaterials, piezoelectric nanocomposites with tunable properties, as well as electronic textiles consisting of functional nanomaterials, are also briefly introduced and discussed.


Piezoelectric Property Composite Beam Nonwoven Fabric Beam Length Interatomic Force 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Ajayan PM, Schadler LS, Giannaris C, A Rubio (2000) Single-walled nanotubes – polymer composites: Strength and weakness. Adv Mater 12(10):750–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anand SV, Mahapatra DR (2009) The dynamics of polymerized carbon nanotubes in semiconductor polymer electronics and electro-mechanical sensing. Nanotechnology 20(14):145707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anand SV, Roy D (2009) Quasi-static and dynamic strain sensing using carbon nanotube/epoxy nanocomposite thin films. Smart Mater Struct 18(4):045013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baughman RH (2000) Putting a new spin on carbon nanotubes. Science 290:1310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baz A, Ro J (1996) Vibration control of plates with active constrained layer damping. Smart Mater Struct 5:272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chopra NG, Zettl A (1998) Measurement of the elastic modulus of a multi-wall boron nitride nanotube. Solid State Commun 105(5):297–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Collins PG, Bradley K, Ishigami M, Zeatl A (2000) Extreme oxygen sensitivity of electronic properties of carbon nanotubes. Science 287:1801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Courty S, Mine J, Tajbakhsh AR, Terentjev EM (2003) Nematic elastomers with aligned carbon nanotubes: New electromechanical actuators Condens Matter 1:234–237Google Scholar
  9. Cummings J, Zettl A (2000) Mass-production of boron nitride double-wall nanotubes and nanococoons. Chem Phys Lett 316:211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dai H, Hafner JH, Rinzler AG, Ccbert DT, Smalley RE (1996) Nanotubes as nanoprobes in scanning probe microscopy. Nature 384:147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Feldman Y, Wasserman E, Srolovitz DJ, Tenne R (1995) High-rate gas-phase growth of MoS2 nested inorganic fullerenes and nanotubes. Science 267(5195):222–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fukada E (2000) History and recent progress in piezoelectric polymers. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 47:1277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Han W, Bando Y, Kurashima K, Sato T (1998) Synthesis of boron nitride nanotubes from carbon nanotubes by a substitution reaction. Appl Phys Lett 73(21):3085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hiremath S, Jalili N (2006) Optimal control of electrospinning for fabrication of nonwoven textile-based sensors and actuators. Proceedings of 3rd international conference of textile research, Cairo, Egypt, Apr 2006Google Scholar
  15. Iijima S (1991) Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. Nature 354:56Google Scholar
  16. Iyer PN (2001) An investigation of physical properties of fluoropolymer carbon nanotube composite matrix materials. Master’s Thesis, Department of Material Science and Engineering, Clemson UniversityGoogle Scholar
  17. Jalili N (2003) Nanotube-based actuator and sensor paradigm: conceptual design and challenges. Proceedings of 2003 ASME international mechanical engineering congress and exposition, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  18. Jalili N, Wagener EH, Ballato JM, Smith DW (2005) Electroactive polymeric composite materials incorporating nanostructures, US Provisional Application Serial No. 60/685,789 (filed May 31, 2005)Google Scholar
  19. Jin L, Bower C, Zhou O (1998) Alignment of carbon nanotubes in a polymer matrix by mechanical stretching. Appl Phys Lett 73(9):1197–1199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kim P, Lieber CM (1999) Nanotube nanotweezers. Science 286:2148Google Scholar
  21. Ko F, Gogotsi Y, Ali A, Naguib N, Ye H, Yang G, Li C, Willis P (2003) Electrospinning of continuous nanotube-filled nanofiber yarns. Adv Mater 15(14):1161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kunstler W, Wegener M, Seib M, Gerhard-Multhaupt R (2001) Preparation and assessment of piezo- and pyroelectric poly(vinylidene fluoride-hexafluoropropylene) copolymer films. Appl Cond Matter Phys A73:641–645Google Scholar
  23. Laxminarayana K, Jalili N (2005) Functional nanotube-based textiles: pathway to next generation fabrics with enhanced sensing capabilities. Textile Res J 75(9):670–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lu KL, Lago RM, Chen YK, Green MLH, Harris PF, Tsang SC (1996) Mechanical damage of carbon nanotubes by ultrasound. Carbon, 34:814–816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mele EJ, Kral P (2002) Electric polarization of heteropolar nanotubes as a geometric phase. Phys Rev Lett 88:568031–568034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mele EJ, Kral P (2001) Quantum geometric phases in molecular nanotubes, abstracts of third international conference on nanotechnology in carbon and related materials, Sussex, UK, AugGoogle Scholar
  27. Millar AJ, Howell LL, Leonard JN (1996) Design and evaluation of complaint constant-force mechanisms. Proceedings of the 1996 ASME design engineering technical conference, 96-DETC/MECH, pp 1209Google Scholar
  28. Pancharal P, Wang ZL, Ugarte D, Heer WD (1999) Electrostatic deflections and electromechanical resonances of carbon nanotubes. Science 283:1513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rajoria H, Jalili N (2005) Passive vibration damping enhancement using carbon nanotube-epoxy reinforced composites. Comp Sci Technol 65(14):2079–2093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ramaratnam A (2004) Semi-active vibration control using piezoelectric-based switched stiffness. Master’s Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Clemson UniversityGoogle Scholar
  31. Ramaratnam A, Jalili N (2006a) A switched stiffness approach for structural vibration control: Theory and real-time implementation. J Sound Vib 291(1–2):258–274MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Salehi-Khojin A, Jalili N (2008a) A comprehensive model for load transfer in nanotube reinforced piezoelectric polymeric composites subjected to electro-thermo-mechanical loadings. J Composites Part B Eng 39(6):986–998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Salehi-Khojin A, Zhong WH (2007a) Enthalpy relaxation of reactive graphitic nanofibers reinforced epoxy. J Mater Sci 42:6093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Salehi-Khojin A, Bashash S, Jalili N (2008) Modeling and experimental vibration analysis of nanomechanical cantilever active probes. J Micromech Microeng 18, 085008:1–11Google Scholar
  35. Salehi-Khojin A, Hosseini MR and Jalili N (2009a) Underlying mechanics of active nanocomposites with tunable properties. Composites Sci Technol 69:545–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sennett M, Welsh E, Wright JB, Li WZ, Wen JG, Ren ZF (2003) Dispersion and alignment of carbon nanotubes in polycarbonate. Appl Phys A76:111–113Google Scholar
  37. Seoul C, Kim Y, Baek C (2003) Electrospinning of poly(vinylidene fluoride)/dimethylformamide solutions with carbon nanotubes. J Polymer Sci Part B: Polymer Phys 41:1572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shimizu Y, Moriyoshi Y, Tanaka H (1999) Boron nitride nanotubes, webs, and coexisting amorphous phase formed by plasma jet method. Appl Phys Lett 76:929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tans SJ, Verschueren RM, Dekker C (1998) Room-temperature transistor based on a single carbon nanotube. Nature 393:40Google Scholar
  40. Vaccarini L, Goze C, Henrard L, Hernandez E, Bernier P, Rubio A (2000) Mechanical and electronic properties of carbon and boron nitride nanotubes. Carbon 38:1681–1690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Xing S (2002) Novel piezoelectric and pyroelectric materials: PVDF copolymer-carbon nanotube composites, Master’s Thesis, Department of Material Science and Engineering, Clemson UniversityGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering373 Snell Engineering Center Northeastern UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations