Advertisement

Canada: New Ideology and Social Assistance in Post-industrial Society

  • Patricia M. Daenzer
Chapter

Contemporary analyses of the Canadian post-industrial welfare state frequently focus on globalization, the creeping market demon sniffing out social programs, as the cause of current welfare state regressions (Mishra, 1999; Fligstein, 1998; Barlow, 1996). Critiques infer that social programs are no longer structured to adequately assist workers made jobless by the global market machinery. State aid now has to be earned following great suffering and loss of dignity (National Council of Welfare, 1997). Social programs put in place between the 1940s and the 1960s, such as employment insurance, retraining assistance, and social assistance, which fall short of adequate, are now seen as too generous (Tzembelicos, 1996). The neoliberal culture of individual responsibility and competitive market accumulation is now in tension with the more old-fashioned values of the just society. In this free and competitive market climate, generous social programs became the antithesis to the labor exploitation so essential for maximum accumulation at the lowest possible cost (Gindin, 2004).

Keywords

Welfare State Policy Language Social Assistance Social Program Universal Health Care 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bales, K. (1999). Disposable people: New slavery in the global economy. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  2. Banting, K. G. Parts 1−5. (1995). Queens forum on social policy. Video. Canadian Broadcasting Corporation Production, Ottawa, CBC International Sales.Google Scholar
  3. Barlow, M. (1996). Globalization and the dismantling of Canadian democracy, values and society. PCDForum Article #17 Release Date March 10, 1996. http://www.pcdf.org/1996/17barlow.htm
  4. Barlow, M., & Bruce C. (1995). How the liberals abandoned the just society. Toronto: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  5. Brock, K. L. (2008). The Politics of asymmetrical federalism: Reconsidering the role and responsibilities of Ottawa. Canadian Public Policy, 34(2), 143–161. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  6. Burgmann, V. (2002). Labour/LeTravail and Canadian working class history: A view from Afar. Labour/LeTravail No. 50. Fall 2002. http://www.historycooperative.org/journals/llt/50/burgmann.html
  7. Canada, Department of Finance: Minister of Finance. (2007). The budget plan 2007. Department of Finance, Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar
  8. Canada, Department of Finance: Minister of Finance. (2006). The budget plan 2006. Department of Finance, Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar
  9. Canada, Department of Justice. (1985). Canada Health Act (R.S.,1985,c,C-6). Google Scholar
  10. Curtis, K. A. (Downloaded 2008). The impact of welfare restructuring on the nonprofit and voluntary sector in Canada and the US. http://www.aspect.bc.ca/pdf/curtisCanadian.pdf
  11. Elwood, W. (2001). The no-nonsense guide to globalization. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  12. Finkel, A. (1995). Origins of the welfare state in Canada. In R. B. Blake & Jeff Keshen (eds.) Social welfare policy in Canada. Historical readings (pp. 221–243). Toronto: Copp Clark.Google Scholar
  13. Fligstein, N. (1998). Is globalization the cause of the crises of welfare states? Paper Prepared for the Annual Meetings of the American Sociological Association held in Toronto, Canada, August 1997.Google Scholar
  14. Franks, C. E. S. (1987). The Parliament of Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  15. Freiler, C. C. F., Felicite S., Brigitte K., & Judy C. (2001). Mothers as earners: Mothers as carers. Responsibility for Children. Social Policy and the tax system. Research Report prepared for the Status of Women Canada, Ottawa.Google Scholar
  16. George, V., & Paul W., (1985). Ideology and social welfare, 2nd. ed. Routledge & Kegan Paul: London.Google Scholar
  17. Gindin, S. (2004). Globalization and labour: Defining the problem. Work in a Global Society. Working Paper Series. 2004-1. Labour Studies Programme, McMaster University, Hamilton.Google Scholar
  18. Godard, J. (2003). Labour unions, workplace rights and Canadian public policy. Canadian Public Policy, 29(4), 449–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Goldfield, M., & Bryan D. P. (2007). Canada’s worker’s movement: Uneven developments. Labour/LeTravail No. 59, Spring 2007Google Scholar
  20. Hibbert, N. (2008). Citizenship and the welfare state: A critique of David Miller's Theory of Nationality Citizenship and the Welfare State. Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique, 41(1), 169–186. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Jiwani, I. (2000). Globalization at the Level of the nation-state: The Case of Canada’s Third Sector. http://www.ucalgary.ca/∼innovative/issues/Inv2000-4.pdf
  22. Laugesen, M., & Susan A. B. (2000). Support for Healthcare in the Western Welfare State: Australia, Canada, Britain, New Zealand and the United States. Paper prepared for the Western Political Science Association Annual Meeting, March 25−27. San Jose, California.Google Scholar
  23. Leo, C. (2006). Deep federalism: Respecting community: Difference in national policy. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 39(3), 481–506.Google Scholar
  24. Leonard, P. (1997). Postmodern welfare: Reconstructing an emancipatory project. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  25. Lightman, E. (2003). Social policy in Canada. Toronto: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Lister, R. (1997). Citizenship: Feminist perspectives. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  27. MacKay, K. (2002, Full). Solidarity and symbolic protest: Lessons for labour from the Québec City Summit of the Americas. Labour/Le Travail #50.Google Scholar
  28. Mamuji, A. (2007, September). Canada’s official development assistance: Policy shortfalls and possible improvements. Major Graduate Research paper for Globalization and the Human Condition, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
  29. McKay, I. (2005). Rebels, reds, radicals: Rethinking Canada’s left history. Toronto: Between the Lines.Google Scholar
  30. Midgley, J. (2000, July). Globalization, capitalism and social welfare. Social Work and Globalization, Special Issue, 13−28.Google Scholar
  31. Mishra, R. (1999). Globalization and the welfare state. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  32. Mishra, R. (1990). The welfare state in capitalist society: Policies of Retrenchment and Maintenance in Europe, North America, and Australia. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  33. Mosher, J., & Joe H. (2005). Welfare Fraud: The constitution of social assistance as crime. Paper prepared for the Law Commission of Canada. See at: http://osgode.yorku.ca/osgmedia.nsf/O/27IAE
  34. Mullaly, B. (2002). Challenging oppression: A critical social work approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. National Council of Welfare. (1997). Another look at welfare reform. Report #99. http://www.ncwcnbes.ne.net/document/researchpublications/Otherpublications/1997Report-AnotherLookAtWelfareReform/Reports
  36. Olsson, S. E. (1993). Social policy and welfare state in Sweden. Lund: Arkiv.Google Scholar
  37. Owram, D. (1986). The government generation: Canadian intellectuals and the state 1900−1945. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  38. Palmer, B. (1992). Working class experience: Rethinking the history of Canadian labour 1800−1991. Toronto: McClelland & Stewart Inc.Google Scholar
  39. Prince, M. J. (1998). Holes in the safety net, leaks in the roof: Changes in Canadian welfare policy and their implications for social housing programs. Housing Policy Debate, 9(4).Google Scholar
  40. Rice, J., & Michael P. (2000a). A double movement: Implications of globalization and Pluralization for the Canadian welfare state. S. McBride & J. Wisemen (Eds.), In Globalization and its Discontents. Basingstoke, England: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  41. Rice, J. R., & Michael J. (2000b). Changing politics of Canadian social policy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  42. Richer, K. (2007). The federal spending power. (PRB 07 36E) Library of Parliament. Parliamentary information and research Service. Law and Government Division. http://www.parl.gc.ca/information/library/PRBpubs/prb0736-e.html
  43. Scott, K. (2003). Funding matters: The impact of Canada’s new funding regime on nonprofit and voluntary organizations. Report prepared for the Canadian Council on Social Development. Ottawa.Google Scholar
  44. Seguin, G. (2008). Canada assistance plan: Canadian Health and Social Transfer; Canada Health Transfer, Canada Social Transfer. Canadian Social Research Links. http://www.canadiansocialresearch.net/cap.html
  45. Smiley, D. V. (1987). The federal condition in Canada. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.Google Scholar
  46. Statistics Canada. (2005). Diverging trends in unionization. Perspectives, 6(4). http://www.statcan.ca/english/freepub/75-001.XIE/1040575-001-XIE.pdf
  47. Struthers, J. (1983). No fault of their own: Unemployment and the Canadian welfare state 1914−1941. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  48. Torczner, J. (2000, July). Globalization, inequality and peace building: What social work can do. Social Work and Globalization. Special Issue, 123−146.Google Scholar
  49. Tzembelicos, A. C. (1996). Canada: State of the Federation. The Series. Social Programs. Chronology of Events July 1995−June 1996. Queens University, School of Policy Studies, Institute of Intergovernmental Relations. http://www.queensu.ca/iigr/pub/SOTF.html Downloaded August 17th, 2008.
  50. Vayda, E., & Raisa B. D. (1995). The Canadian health care system: A developmental Overview. In R. Blake & J. Keshen (Eds.), Social welfare policy in Canada (pp. 313−325). Mississauga: Copp Clark.Google Scholar
  51. Wolfe, R., & Mendhelsohn, M. (2005). Values and interests in attitudes toward trade and globalization: The continuing compromise of embedded liberalism. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 38(1), 1−24.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social WorkMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations