Skip to main content

Collaborating with Multiple Distributed Perspectives and Memories

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Social Computing and Behavioral Modeling

Experience-based reasoning is a powerful tool for decision-support systems which attempt to leverage human memories as examples to solve problems. However, there is also a requirement to leverage recorded experiences that are created by a set of diverse users from a variety of work positions, with varied goals, cultural backgrounds, and perspectives across time. New computing methods need to be specified and defined in order to resolve some of the problems introduced by these requirements. The research discussed in this paper focuses on the ongoing issue of how to reconcile the different personal and cultural perspectives of agents in order to make group decisions. We discuss how individual agent history and culture can influence experience-based reasoning. We compare our approaches to traditional experiencebased reasoning techniques in order to highlight important issues and future directions in social decision making. Results from an experiment are presented that describe how shared problem solving presents issues of consensus and buy-in for various stakeholders and how a constraint based coherence mechanism can be used to ensure coherence in joint action among a group of agents and improve performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baliga S. and Vohra R. (2003) Market Research and Market Design. The B.E. Journal in Theoretical Economics 3.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bergemann D., Schlag K. (2007) Robust Monopoly Pricing. Discussion Paper 1527R, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bergemann D., Schlag K. (2008) Pricing without Priors, Journal of the European Economic Association (April–May 2008), 6(2–3)560–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Goldberg A., Hartline J., Karlin A., Saks M., Wright A. (2005) Competitive Auctions. Mimeo Mcrosoft

    Google Scholar 

  5. Immorlica N., Mahdian M., Mirrokni W. (2005) Limitations of cross-monotonic cost sharing schemes, Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Juarez R. (2007) Group strategyproof cost sharing: The role of indifferences. Mimeo University of Hawaii

    Google Scholar 

  7. Juarez R. (2008a) The worst absolute surplus loss in the problem of commons: Random Priority vs. Average Cost. Economic Theory 34.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Juarez R. (2008b) Optimal group strategyproof cost sharing: budget balance vs. efficiency. Mimeo University of Hawaii

    Google Scholar 

  9. Juarez R. (2008c) Collusion-proof cost sharing. Mimeo University of Hawaii

    Google Scholar 

  10. Moulin H. (1999) Incremental Cost Sharing: characterization by coalitional strategy-proofness. Social Choice and Welfare 16.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Moulin H. (2008) The price of anarchy of serial cost sharing and other methods. Econ. Theory 36.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Moulin H., Shenker S. (2001) Strategyproof sharing of submodular costs: budget balance versus efficiency. Economic Theory 18.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Myerson R. (1981) Optimal Auction Design. Mathematics of Operation Research 6.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. P'al, E. Tardos (2003) Group strategyproof mechanisms via primal-dual algorithms, In Proceedings of 44th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Roughgarden T. Sundararajan M. (2006a) Approximately efficient cost-sharing mechanisms. Mimeo Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  16. Roughgarden T., Sundararajan M. (2006b) New TradeOffs in Cost Sharing Mechanisms, STOC.

    Google Scholar 

  17. T. Roughgarden, Mehta A., Sundararajan M. (2008a) Beyond Moulin Mechanisms, Forthcoming Games and Economic Behavior.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Roughgarden T., Dobzinski S., Mehta A., and Sundararajan M.(2008b) Is Shapley Cost Sharing Optimal? Symposium on Algorithmic Game Theory.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anthony J. Ford .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag US

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ford, A.J., Mulvehill, A.M. (2009). Collaborating with Multiple Distributed Perspectives and Memories. In: Social Computing and Behavioral Modeling. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0056-2_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0056-2_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-0055-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-0056-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics